Kissin 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.67	38	0.00	34	0.07	27	0.25	34	0.15	39	0.19
Anderszewski 2003		73	0.39	51	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.64	4	0.06	7	0.12	15	0.45	26	0.28	19	0.35
Bacha 2000		48	0.56	76	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	25	0.31	43	0.11
Badura 1965		49	0.55	80	0.00	44	0.07	42	0.14	25	0.31	38	0.21
Barbosa 1983		60	0.47	50	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	50	0.05	57	0.05
Biret 1990		51	0.55	42	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	54	0.04	68	0.04
Blet 2003		39	0.61	69	0.00	57	0.04	61	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Block 1995		17	0.70	55	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.20	14	0.33	30	0.26
Blumental 1952		77	0.33	17	0.01	66	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.03	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.70	20	0.01	24	0.07	24	0.30	10	0.38	21	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		22	0.68	33	0.00	39	0.06	28	0.25	15	0.39	23	0.31
Bunin 1987		67	0.45	39	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	68	0.04	67	0.04
Bunin 1987b		66	0.45	66	0.00	77	0.02	88	0.02	67	0.04	72	0.03
Chiu 1999		45	0.57	48	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.24	19	0.36	24	0.29
Cohen 1997		74	0.38	45	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	35	0.16	54	0.07
Cortot 1951		62	0.47	72	0.00	75	0.02	86	0.02	70	0.03	88	0.02
Csalog 1996		53	0.51	9	0.02	27	0.07	43	0.13	9	0.52	29	0.26
Czerny 1949		56	0.49	77	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	76	0.03	80	0.03
Czerny 1990		21	0.68	30	0.00	38	0.08	33	0.23	48	0.05	45	0.11
Duchoud 2007		57	0.49	53	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.13	66	0.04	53	0.07
Ezaki 2006		10	0.76	60	0.00	17	0.08	11	0.48	23	0.28	16	0.37
Falvay 1989		1	0.84	3	0.08	3	0.19	5	0.57	6	0.54	5	0.55
Farrell 1958		61	0.47	46	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.02	83	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		72	0.41	84	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	88	0.02	85	0.02
Fliere 1977		6	0.78	8	0.02	6	0.13	4	0.60	4	0.47	6	0.53
Fou 1978		2	0.83	1	0.30	1	0.30	1	0.71	1	0.60	2	0.65
Francois 1956		34	0.62	29	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.32	30	0.19	33	0.25
Friedman 1923		88	-0.11	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		89	-0.11	67	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	81	0.03	87	0.02
Friedman 1930		84	0.11	58	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	57	0.05	65	0.04
Garcia 2007		78	0.28	85	0.00	84	0.03	72	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.03
Garcia 2007b		85	0.03	86	0.00	86	0.02	81	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Gierzod 1998		46	0.57	6	0.03	13	0.08	35	0.22	41	0.12	40	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		20	0.68	61	0.00	15	0.07	18	0.38	20	0.31	22	0.34
Groot 1988		12	0.74	27	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.41	16	0.39	15	0.40
Harasiewicz 1955		47	0.57	10	0.02	30	0.07	26	0.25	30	0.22	36	0.23
Hatto 1993		81	0.24	54	0.00	61	0.08	45	0.08	66	0.03	60	0.05
Hatto 1997		79	0.28	73	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	83	0.02	78	0.03
Horowitz 1949		43	0.58	21	0.01	26	0.06	34	0.23	12	0.36	25	0.29
Indjic 1988		80	0.26	70	0.00	60	0.06	47	0.06	70	0.03	63	0.04
Kapell 1951		64	0.46	28	0.00	74	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	84	0.02
Kissin 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1989		11	0.75	13	0.01	8	0.10	6	0.56	5	0.48	7	0.52
Luisada 1991		33	0.63	25	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.35	20	0.33	20	0.34
Lushtak 2004		36	0.62	26	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.17	64	0.04	49	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.78	7	0.02	10	0.13	7	0.54	13	0.43	10	0.48
Magaloff 1978		8	0.78	11	0.02	9	0.10	10	0.48	5	0.47	11	0.47
Magin 1975		29	0.66	12	0.01	16	0.08	19	0.36	7	0.37	17	0.36
Michalowski 1933		83	0.18	68	0.00	83	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.03	74	0.03
Milkina 1970		4	0.80	5	0.04	4	0.19	3	0.62	5	0.58	3	0.60
Mohovich 1999		13	0.73	59	0.00	31	0.08	25	0.27	24	0.28	27	0.27
Moravec 1969		37	0.62	62	0.00	28	0.06	38	0.18	19	0.35	31	0.25
Morozova 2008		40	0.60	31	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	58	0.04	58	0.05
Neighaus 1950		27	0.67	47	0.00	25	0.07	23	0.31	37	0.17	35	0.23
Niedzielski 1931		76	0.37	65	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	53	0.04	70	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		41	0.59	14	0.01	22	0.11	29	0.25	25	0.24	34	0.24
Osinska 1989		15	0.70	44	0.00	33	0.06	32	0.23	23	0.29	28	0.26
Pachmann 1927		52	0.53	24	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	23	0.33	41	0.14
Paderewski 1930		38	0.61	16	0.01	48	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.11	52	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.65	23	0.00	41	0.09	36	0.21	28	0.22	37	0.21
Pierdomenico 2008		14	0.71	35	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.46	2	0.51	9	0.48
Poblocka 1999		35	0.62	40	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	69	0.03	61	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.45	74	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	65	0.03	71	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.43	79	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	46	0.05	56	0.05
Rangell 2001		23	0.68	41	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.43	5	0.46	13	0.44
Richter 1976		28	0.66	32	0.00	40	0.08	30	0.24	18	0.26	32	0.25
Rosen 1989		19	0.69	87	0.00	29	0.07	21	0.32	20	0.40	18	0.36
Rosenthal 1930		55	0.50	71	0.00	64	0.04	56	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		54	0.50	37	0.00	49	0.04	63	0.04	28	0.31	44	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.48	52	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	22	0.29	42	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c		42	0.58	63	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.23	47	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		50	0.55	88	0.00	50	0.04	64	0.04	22	0.32	46	0.11
Rossi 2007		71	0.42	89	0.00	46	0.04	59	0.04	21	0.21	48	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.22	56	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	37	0.18	51	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.76	18	0.01	11	0.12	9	0.50	1	0.63	4	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		31	0.64	81	0.00	43	0.07	39	0.17	9	0.51	26	0.29
Schilhawsky 1960		63	0.46	82	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03
Shebanova 2002		3	0.81	2	0.21	2	0.21	2	0.70	1	0.67	1	0.68
Smith 1975		24	0.67	34	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.17	66	0.03	50	0.07
Sokolov 2002		44	0.57	43	0.00	63	0.06	49	0.06	72	0.03	62	0.04
Sztompka 1959		68	0.45	22	0.01	76	0.02	82	0.02	66	0.04	73	0.03
Tomsic 1995		5	0.80	19	0.01	5	0.17	14	0.45	13	0.42	14	0.43
Uninsky 1932		75	0.38	36	0.00	80	0.02	80	0.02	61	0.04	79	0.03
Uninsky 1971		70	0.43	49	0.00	81	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.02	75	0.03
Wasowski 1980		59	0.48	75	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	69	0.04	69	0.03
Zak 1937		26	0.67	64	0.00	20	0.10	13	0.45	11	0.43	12	0.44
Zak 1951		18	0.70	15	0.01	14	0.07	8	0.52	11	0.46	8	0.49
Random 1		87	-0.04	57	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	29	0.19	55	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.12	90	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	57	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		86	0.01	83	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	37	0.14	59	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).