Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.74	22	0.01	11	0.08	15	0.37	15	0.34	17	0.35
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.62	30	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	26	0.26	48	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.70	2	0.14	2	0.14	1	0.60	10	0.46	2	0.53
Bacha 2000		60	0.58	36	0.00	72	0.03	66	0.03	42	0.11	59	0.06
Badura 1965		55	0.60	6	0.04	29	0.05	16	0.36	2	0.60	9	0.46
Barbosa 1983		72	0.49	88	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	46	0.06	67	0.05
Biret 1990		14	0.73	43	0.00	36	0.05	35	0.22	35	0.16	40	0.19
Blet 2003		39	0.67	39	0.00	50	0.04	52	0.04	51	0.05	74	0.04
Block 1995		23	0.71	16	0.01	28	0.06	28	0.28	6	0.40	20	0.33
Blumental 1952		76	0.42	24	0.01	47	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.04	77	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.69	46	0.00	27	0.07	36	0.21	15	0.33	33	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.66	89	0.00	58	0.04	54	0.04	32	0.22	51	0.09
Bunin 1987		67	0.54	84	0.00	79	0.04	57	0.04	48	0.05	79	0.04
Bunin 1987b		66	0.54	85	0.00	78	0.04	63	0.04	49	0.05	71	0.04
Chiu 1999		69	0.51	55	0.00	48	0.04	58	0.04	38	0.13	56	0.07
Cohen 1997		81	0.34	21	0.01	81	0.02	83	0.02	40	0.12	69	0.05
Cortot 1951		38	0.67	20	0.01	39	0.06	42	0.15	25	0.31	37	0.22
Csalog 1996		73	0.49	37	0.00	63	0.03	73	0.03	51	0.06	73	0.04
Czerny 1949		36	0.68	41	0.00	10	0.08	23	0.32	27	0.27	25	0.29
Czerny 1990		3	0.82	1	0.15	1	0.15	4	0.49	7	0.47	5	0.48
Duchoud 2007		19	0.72	28	0.00	30	0.06	20	0.33	27	0.31	22	0.32
Ezaki 2006		10	0.74	32	0.00	26	0.09	13	0.37	32	0.18	31	0.26
Falvay 1989		21	0.71	56	0.00	41	0.08	34	0.22	37	0.14	42	0.18
Farrell 1958		51	0.61	44	0.00	76	0.03	72	0.03	61	0.04	82	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.50	77	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	54	0.04	85	0.03
Fliere 1977		4	0.82	9	0.03	4	0.10	3	0.52	5	0.45	4	0.48
Fou 1978		45	0.63	31	0.00	34	0.07	30	0.24	19	0.39	23	0.31
Francois 1956		37	0.67	51	0.00	15	0.07	25	0.30	23	0.27	27	0.28
Friedman 1923		86	0.17	81	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	52	0.06	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		87	0.17	80	0.00	87	0.02	82	0.02	72	0.04	86	0.03
Friedman 1930		83	0.32	74	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	45	0.06	75	0.04
Garcia 2007		75	0.43	58	0.00	77	0.03	68	0.03	32	0.21	54	0.08
Garcia 2007b		85	0.25	60	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	24	0.20	62	0.06
Gierzod 1998		13	0.73	57	0.00	32	0.05	24	0.30	21	0.22	32	0.26
Gornostaeva 1994		2	0.84	14	0.02	5	0.09	8	0.43	9	0.39	12	0.41
Groot 1988		16	0.72	83	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.16	39	0.13	45	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		63	0.55	12	0.03	22	0.06	27	0.28	18	0.33	24	0.30
Hatto 1993		80	0.36	29	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	38	0.13	61	0.06
Hatto 1997		78	0.40	78	0.00	70	0.03	77	0.03	58	0.03	84	0.03
Horowitz 1949		62	0.58	54	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.11	58	0.07
Indjic 1988		79	0.37	63	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	40	0.10	66	0.05
Kapell 1951		47	0.63	67	0.00	64	0.03	71	0.03	49	0.05	70	0.04
Kissin 1993		9	0.75	11	0.03	6	0.11	5	0.48	6	0.56	3	0.52
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		25	0.70	19	0.01	33	0.06	17	0.36	10	0.42	14	0.39
Lushtak 2004		68	0.52	25	0.01	57	0.04	53	0.04	52	0.05	76	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		1	0.84	3	0.11	3	0.15	2	0.58	8	0.50	1	0.54
Magaloff 1978		8	0.76	33	0.00	21	0.06	18	0.33	22	0.35	19	0.34
Magin 1975		18	0.72	5	0.06	7	0.09	7	0.45	2	0.49	6	0.47
Michalowski 1933		77	0.41	23	0.01	17	0.09	32	0.23	35	0.27	34	0.25
Milkina 1970		11	0.74	27	0.00	19	0.07	12	0.39	14	0.41	13	0.40
Mohovich 1999		31	0.68	64	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.04	78	0.04
Moravec 1969		22	0.71	8	0.03	14	0.11	19	0.33	9	0.50	11	0.41
Morozova 2008		28	0.69	17	0.01	9	0.08	6	0.47	2	0.47	7	0.47
Neighaus 1950		34	0.68	86	0.00	20	0.06	21	0.32	33	0.22	30	0.27
Niedzielski 1931		70	0.51	61	0.00	75	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.12	57	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.69	71	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.18	26	0.23	39	0.20
Osinska 1989		6	0.78	10	0.03	13	0.09	22	0.32	15	0.37	18	0.34
Pachmann 1927		82	0.34	59	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.03	89	0.02
Paderewski 1930		53	0.61	75	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	54	0.04	72	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.64	18	0.01	44	0.07	43	0.14	26	0.24	41	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		17	0.72	66	0.00	25	0.09	26	0.29	7	0.42	16	0.35
Poblocka 1999		35	0.68	34	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	73	0.03	80	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		42	0.64	90	0.00	38	0.05	44	0.12	37	0.16	43	0.14
Rachmaninoff 1923		58	0.58	82	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.17	25	0.24	38	0.20
Rangell 2001		32	0.68	4	0.06	8	0.09	29	0.25	16	0.29	29	0.27
Richter 1976		43	0.64	13	0.02	45	0.06	45	0.06	23	0.23	47	0.12
Rosen 1989		5	0.78	42	0.00	12	0.09	9	0.42	8	0.51	10	0.46
Rosenthal 1930		26	0.70	45	0.00	43	0.08	37	0.19	16	0.43	26	0.29
Rosenthal 1931		46	0.63	65	0.00	54	0.05	47	0.05	18	0.38	44	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		61	0.58	87	0.00	65	0.03	69	0.03	21	0.32	50	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		33	0.68	62	0.00	37	0.05	41	0.16	13	0.40	35	0.25
Rosenthal 1931d		49	0.62	53	0.00	73	0.03	67	0.03	24	0.27	53	0.09
Rossi 2007		74	0.48	79	0.00	23	0.06	31	0.23	2	0.45	21	0.32
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.31	72	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	47	0.05	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		64	0.55	49	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.62	52	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	28	0.26	49	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.60	68	0.00	62	0.04	64	0.04	49	0.06	68	0.05
Shebanova 2002		20	0.72	7	0.04	18	0.10	10	0.40	3	0.56	8	0.47
Smith 1975		15	0.73	47	0.00	24	0.08	14	0.37	36	0.19	28	0.27
Sokolov 2002		7	0.76	15	0.01	16	0.08	11	0.39	26	0.35	15	0.37
Sztompka 1959		52	0.61	26	0.01	59	0.03	74	0.03	47	0.07	65	0.05
Tomsic 1995		27	0.69	48	0.00	31	0.05	33	0.22	26	0.27	36	0.24
Uninsky 1932		65	0.55	35	0.00	66	0.03	79	0.03	41	0.13	60	0.06
Uninsky 1971		57	0.58	38	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	59	0.04	83	0.03
Wasowski 1980		41	0.65	69	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	9	0.35	46	0.13
Zak 1937		59	0.58	40	0.00	49	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.06	63	0.05
Zak 1951		56	0.59	50	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	48	0.05	64	0.05
Random 1		89	0.04	70	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	18	0.32	55	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.14	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.16	73	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	14	0.40	52	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).