Zak 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.66	22	0.00	12	0.10	19	0.36	26	0.26	25	0.31
Anderszewski 2003		77	0.34	23	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	44	0.07	64	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.53	65	0.00	16	0.06	37	0.19	31	0.21	37	0.20
Bacha 2000		54	0.53	24	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	11	0.47	42	0.15
Badura 1965		58	0.51	66	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	44	0.09	59	0.07
Barbosa 1983		20	0.65	67	0.00	31	0.07	23	0.33	17	0.39	19	0.36
Biret 1990		42	0.57	3	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.15	22	0.26	38	0.20
Blet 2003		29	0.62	37	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.17	46	0.06	49	0.10
Block 1995		69	0.44	68	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	49	0.04	83	0.03
Blumental 1952		75	0.36	69	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	41	0.10	60	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		44	0.56	10	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	29	0.21	50	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.60	38	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.14	20	0.35	31	0.22
Bunin 1987		25	0.63	39	0.00	34	0.07	30	0.25	39	0.15	40	0.19
Bunin 1987b		27	0.63	70	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.25	39	0.15	39	0.19
Chiu 1999		17	0.67	40	0.00	17	0.06	13	0.42	8	0.52	9	0.47
Cohen 1997		81	0.23	41	0.00	81	0.03	86	0.03	50	0.05	75	0.04
Cortot 1951		68	0.45	47	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	68	0.04	76	0.04
Csalog 1996		49	0.54	31	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	8	0.52	33	0.22
Czerny 1949		37	0.58	48	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.21	43	0.09	45	0.14
Czerny 1990		23	0.63	42	0.00	26	0.06	20	0.34	41	0.11	41	0.19
Duchoud 2007		52	0.53	43	0.00	55	0.06	45	0.06	47	0.05	65	0.05
Ezaki 2006		14	0.68	25	0.00	23	0.07	14	0.41	30	0.18	30	0.27
Falvay 1989		2	0.81	6	0.00	2	0.24	2	0.62	2	0.63	2	0.62
Farrell 1958		51	0.54	32	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	22	0.23	46	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		72	0.41	4	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03
Fliere 1977		8	0.71	49	0.00	9	0.13	10	0.47	15	0.35	13	0.41
Fou 1978		9	0.71	5	0.00	10	0.10	4	0.51	13	0.45	7	0.48
Francois 1956		11	0.70	33	0.00	8	0.12	12	0.44	12	0.37	17	0.40
Friedman 1923		87	-0.01	71	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	64	0.05	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.00	72	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1930		83	0.18	20	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	65	0.04	80	0.03
Garcia 2007		79	0.31	26	0.00	79	0.03	73	0.03	22	0.29	52	0.09
Garcia 2007b		85	0.10	73	0.00	85	0.03	74	0.03	35	0.11	61	0.06
Gierzod 1998		35	0.60	44	0.00	13	0.06	33	0.22	25	0.21	35	0.21
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.55	50	0.00	59	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.04	67	0.05
Groot 1988		7	0.74	51	0.00	6	0.18	8	0.48	11	0.46	10	0.47
Harasiewicz 1955		33	0.60	8	0.00	18	0.06	16	0.40	22	0.32	20	0.36
Hatto 1993		80	0.30	27	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	27	0.21	53	0.09
Hatto 1997		74	0.36	74	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	37	0.12	56	0.08
Horowitz 1949		4	0.75	52	0.00	3	0.27	7	0.50	2	0.56	4	0.53
Indjic 1988		78	0.33	53	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	27	0.25	48	0.10
Kapell 1951		47	0.54	11	0.00	67	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.05	72	0.04
Kissin 1993		12	0.70	75	0.00	11	0.10	11	0.46	8	0.52	6	0.49
Kushner 1989		36	0.59	9	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	46	0.06	63	0.05
Luisada 1991		50	0.54	18	0.00	15	0.06	29	0.26	19	0.33	27	0.29
Lushtak 2004		15	0.67	34	0.00	20	0.07	9	0.48	21	0.35	14	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.68	28	0.00	21	0.06	18	0.39	21	0.30	22	0.34
Magaloff 1978		30	0.62	54	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.31	27	0.29	26	0.30
Magin 1975		70	0.43	76	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	42	0.11	58	0.07
Michalowski 1933		84	0.15	77	0.00	82	0.03	85	0.03	73	0.04	79	0.03
Milkina 1970		19	0.65	55	0.00	19	0.07	15	0.41	10	0.44	11	0.42
Mohovich 1999		3	0.77	35	0.00	4	0.16	5	0.50	7	0.47	8	0.48
Moravec 1969		21	0.64	29	0.00	14	0.06	27	0.28	6	0.51	18	0.38
Morozova 2008		40	0.57	45	0.00	25	0.07	36	0.19	17	0.21	36	0.20
Neighaus 1950		6	0.74	19	0.00	5	0.19	3	0.61	3	0.57	3	0.59
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.48	36	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	6	0.45	44	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.57	56	0.00	36	0.07	41	0.16	19	0.29	32	0.22
Osinska 1989		48	0.54	46	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.04	69	0.04
Pachmann 1927		26	0.63	14	0.00	29	0.07	24	0.32	10	0.51	16	0.40
Paderewski 1930		73	0.38	78	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.70	57	0.00	22	0.07	17	0.40	15	0.40	15	0.40
Pierdomenico 2008		34	0.60	79	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.20	9	0.39	28	0.28
Poblocka 1999		46	0.54	12	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	65	0.04	70	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		71	0.43	13	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.03	78	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		31	0.61	58	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.33	13	0.36	21	0.34
Rangell 2001		57	0.52	2	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	34	0.18	57	0.08
Richter 1976		41	0.57	59	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.18	21	0.24	34	0.21
Rosen 1989		55	0.52	7	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		66	0.47	80	0.00	71	0.06	46	0.06	52	0.04	66	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		64	0.48	60	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	35	0.18	55	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		65	0.48	61	0.00	64	0.05	57	0.05	31	0.18	54	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.52	81	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.05	68	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.51	82	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	27	0.24	51	0.10
Rossi 2007		82	0.20	62	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.34	83	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	28	0.32	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		16	0.67	84	0.00	30	0.07	21	0.34	11	0.51	12	0.42
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.62	85	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.27	24	0.39	23	0.32
Schilhawsky 1960		22	0.64	86	0.00	27	0.06	25	0.31	26	0.26	29	0.28
Shebanova 2002		24	0.63	30	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.23	18	0.43	24	0.31
Smith 1975		38	0.58	15	0.00	47	0.05	60	0.05	64	0.04	71	0.04
Sokolov 2002		43	0.56	87	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.05	62	0.05
Sztompka 1959		67	0.45	16	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	68	0.04	73	0.04
Tomsic 1995		5	0.75	63	0.00	7	0.17	6	0.50	9	0.51	5	0.50
Uninsky 1932		62	0.49	17	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	60	0.04	82	0.03
Uninsky 1971		59	0.51	88	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	58	0.05	74	0.04
Wasowski 1980		61	0.51	21	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.16	30	0.14	43	0.15
Zak 1937		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Zak 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		88	-0.07	89	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	56	0.04	88	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.20	90	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	88	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.21	64	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).