Paderewski 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		48	0.53	66	0.00	56	0.03	56	0.03	55	0.04	71	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		53	0.51	48	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.15	54	0.04	37	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.64	32	0.00	21	0.06	11	0.39	41	0.11	19	0.21
Bacha 2000		63	0.44	89	0.00	71	0.03	67	0.03	61	0.04	60	0.03
Badura 1965		57	0.49	42	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04	57	0.04
Barbosa 1983		61	0.45	68	0.00	41	0.04	39	0.10	73	0.03	51	0.05
Biret 1990		46	0.55	30	0.00	50	0.04	51	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.04
Blet 2003		21	0.61	2	0.10	8	0.13	13	0.38	29	0.21	13	0.28
Block 1995		26	0.60	15	0.01	29	0.06	30	0.16	17	0.30	17	0.22
Blumental 1952		58	0.47	7	0.04	10	0.08	24	0.23	16	0.30	16	0.26
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.67	25	0.01	20	0.07	16	0.33	20	0.30	11	0.31
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.50	83	0.00	75	0.03	62	0.03	62	0.04	62	0.03
Bunin 1987		40	0.57	27	0.01	13	0.08	18	0.26	40	0.12	21	0.18
Bunin 1987b		39	0.57	10	0.04	12	0.07	19	0.26	41	0.12	20	0.18
Chiu 1999		79	0.32	49	0.00	68	0.02	75	0.02	73	0.03	80	0.02
Cohen 1997		65	0.43	64	0.00	54	0.04	50	0.04	26	0.27	33	0.10
Cortot 1951		6	0.69	16	0.01	6	0.12	5	0.45	16	0.43	3	0.44
Csalog 1996		69	0.42	69	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	57	0.05	70	0.03
Czerny 1949		31	0.59	34	0.00	37	0.05	34	0.14	53	0.06	34	0.09
Czerny 1990		13	0.66	51	0.00	35	0.05	32	0.15	66	0.04	38	0.08
Duchoud 2007		43	0.55	90	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	72	0.03	72	0.03
Ezaki 2006		19	0.62	77	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	75	0.03	53	0.04
Falvay 1989		42	0.55	78	0.00	65	0.02	80	0.02	64	0.04	66	0.03
Farrell 1958		20	0.61	11	0.03	16	0.09	15	0.34	9	0.30	10	0.32
Ferenczy 1958		11	0.67	72	0.00	22	0.08	10	0.39	23	0.36	8	0.37
Fliere 1977		10	0.68	35	0.00	27	0.07	17	0.26	71	0.04	30	0.10
Fou 1978		62	0.45	59	0.00	66	0.02	82	0.02	59	0.05	67	0.03
Francois 1956		36	0.57	43	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.09	60	0.04	47	0.06
Friedman 1923		86	0.12	47	0.00	34	0.06	37	0.12	35	0.22	25	0.16
Friedman 1923b		85	0.12	19	0.01	31	0.06	36	0.13	32	0.21	23	0.17
Friedman 1930		70	0.42	3	0.10	4	0.11	12	0.38	18	0.37	7	0.37
Garcia 2007		82	0.28	79	0.00	78	0.02	79	0.02	54	0.04	73	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.10	75	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	36	0.11	48	0.06
Gierzod 1998		8	0.68	29	0.01	17	0.07	14	0.37	33	0.18	15	0.26
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.60	38	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	56	0.04	46	0.06
Groot 1988		15	0.64	60	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	75	0.03	59	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		68	0.42	45	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	64	0.03	52	0.05
Hatto 1993		83	0.27	52	0.00	61	0.04	52	0.04	76	0.02	75	0.03
Hatto 1997		77	0.33	61	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.10	52	0.04	43	0.06
Horowitz 1949		66	0.43	41	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	80	0.03	87	0.02
Indjic 1988		80	0.28	65	0.00	60	0.03	69	0.03	77	0.02	88	0.02
Kapell 1951		3	0.72	14	0.02	5	0.14	2	0.50	26	0.36	5	0.42
Kissin 1993		22	0.61	13	0.03	28	0.06	38	0.11	50	0.05	39	0.07
Kushner 1989		24	0.61	70	0.00	51	0.04	54	0.04	65	0.04	54	0.04
Luisada 1991		59	0.45	84	0.00	64	0.02	77	0.02	74	0.03	78	0.02
Lushtak 2004		38	0.57	22	0.01	14	0.10	9	0.39	60	0.04	29	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.69	21	0.01	23	0.07	23	0.23	83	0.03	36	0.08
Magaloff 1978		7	0.68	39	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.23	58	0.04	31	0.10
Magin 1975		67	0.43	37	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.02
Michalowski 1933		49	0.53	18	0.01	9	0.15	7	0.42	14	0.44	4	0.43
Milkina 1970		37	0.57	62	0.00	59	0.03	66	0.03	61	0.04	68	0.03
Mohovich 1999		18	0.63	26	0.01	39	0.05	35	0.13	67	0.03	45	0.06
Moravec 1969		34	0.59	24	0.01	52	0.03	59	0.03	40	0.11	42	0.06
Morozova 2008		71	0.41	86	0.00	79	0.03	68	0.03	81	0.02	89	0.02
Neighaus 1950		35	0.58	58	0.00	33	0.06	27	0.18	68	0.03	41	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.43	17	0.01	80	0.02	71	0.02	80	0.02	83	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.59	33	0.00	55	0.04	53	0.04	65	0.03	69	0.03
Osinska 1989		2	0.73	6	0.06	2	0.12	6	0.44	13	0.38	6	0.41
Pachmann 1927		72	0.39	20	0.01	38	0.05	40	0.10	44	0.10	32	0.10
Paderewski 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.50	56	0.00	57	0.03	58	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.52	54	0.00	67	0.02	78	0.02	79	0.03	81	0.02
Poblocka 1999		1	0.75	1	0.12	1	0.12	4	0.49	17	0.41	2	0.45
Rabcewiczowa 1932		14	0.65	31	0.00	18	0.08	8	0.40	23	0.33	9	0.36
Rachmaninoff 1923		78	0.33	46	0.00	81	0.03	61	0.03	83	0.03	65	0.03
Rangell 2001		17	0.64	28	0.01	19	0.07	22	0.24	46	0.07	28	0.13
Richter 1976		52	0.51	50	0.00	69	0.02	72	0.02	33	0.13	50	0.05
Rosen 1989		28	0.60	36	0.00	15	0.07	21	0.26	29	0.28	14	0.27
Rosenthal 1930		44	0.55	71	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.08	48	0.05	44	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.38	80	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	65	0.03	55	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.37	67	0.00	77	0.03	57	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		27	0.60	5	0.06	25	0.07	28	0.18	33	0.19	22	0.18
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.45	81	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	67	0.03	74	0.03
Rossi 2007		81	0.28	53	0.00	73	0.02	73	0.02	47	0.04	64	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.20	82	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	75	0.03	82	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.55	63	0.00	74	0.02	76	0.02	54	0.06	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.56	87	0.00	62	0.03	60	0.03	58	0.05	56	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.60	12	0.03	24	0.07	20	0.26	42	0.10	24	0.16
Shebanova 2002		30	0.60	8	0.04	11	0.08	29	0.17	40	0.12	27	0.14
Smith 1975		4	0.70	4	0.08	3	0.15	1	0.55	39	0.16	12	0.30
Sokolov 2002		45	0.55	74	0.00	72	0.03	65	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.03
Sztompka 1959		9	0.68	9	0.04	7	0.11	3	0.49	14	0.44	1	0.46
Tomsic 1995		33	0.59	57	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.05
Uninsky 1932		50	0.52	44	0.00	32	0.05	31	0.15	40	0.15	26	0.15
Uninsky 1971		23	0.61	40	0.00	30	0.06	26	0.22	37	0.21	18	0.21
Wasowski 1980		54	0.51	55	0.00	70	0.02	74	0.02	82	0.03	79	0.02
Zak 1937		73	0.39	85	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.03	85	0.02
Zak 1951		74	0.38	88	0.00	85	0.02	81	0.02	78	0.03	86	0.02
Random 1		90	-0.14	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	0.09	23	0.01	87	0.02	88	0.02	7	0.45	35	0.09
Random 3		89	0.09	76	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	24	0.23	40	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).