Rachmaninoff 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.62	34	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.26	32	0.19	25	0.22
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.48	80	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	37	0.15	49	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		60	0.44	25	0.01	38	0.05	37	0.14	61	0.04	53	0.07
Bacha 2000		84	0.21	72	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03
Badura 1965		38	0.51	20	0.01	45	0.04	50	0.04	32	0.22	46	0.09
Barbosa 1983		41	0.49	59	0.00	67	0.03	67	0.03	57	0.04	78	0.03
Biret 1990		36	0.52	43	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04	70	0.04
Blet 2003		23	0.57	41	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.14	43	0.09	40	0.11
Block 1995		62	0.43	67	0.00	70	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04	67	0.04
Blumental 1952		80	0.28	57	0.00	72	0.04	49	0.04	59	0.04	69	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.45	42	0.00	35	0.05	44	0.08	38	0.14	42	0.11
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.47	40	0.00	75	0.05	45	0.05	58	0.04	63	0.04
Bunin 1987		3	0.68	4	0.09	4	0.11	11	0.38	14	0.43	9	0.40
Bunin 1987b		4	0.68	7	0.04	5	0.16	12	0.38	14	0.43	7	0.40
Chiu 1999		58	0.45	10	0.02	34	0.04	34	0.15	31	0.21	33	0.18
Cohen 1997		87	-0.10	61	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Cortot 1951		51	0.47	66	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.20	47	0.09
Csalog 1996		86	0.13	76	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.03	84	0.02
Czerny 1949		9	0.64	81	0.00	16	0.08	8	0.40	21	0.37	11	0.38
Czerny 1990		2	0.68	1	0.18	1	0.17	1	0.61	9	0.42	2	0.51
Duchoud 2007		10	0.64	12	0.02	15	0.07	16	0.34	29	0.29	17	0.31
Ezaki 2006		7	0.64	32	0.00	8	0.10	15	0.35	34	0.17	22	0.24
Falvay 1989		40	0.50	51	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.10	63	0.04	55	0.06
Farrell 1958		42	0.49	28	0.01	53	0.03	75	0.03	24	0.23	48	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		73	0.35	45	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	51	0.04	80	0.03
Fliere 1977		12	0.63	36	0.00	13	0.07	17	0.33	40	0.13	26	0.21
Fou 1978		57	0.45	30	0.01	68	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.05	65	0.04
Francois 1956		6	0.65	29	0.01	23	0.07	20	0.29	20	0.29	19	0.29
Friedman 1923		72	0.35	11	0.02	32	0.07	33	0.16	6	0.51	20	0.29
Friedman 1923b		70	0.37	38	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.17	6	0.50	18	0.29
Friedman 1930		50	0.48	13	0.02	9	0.09	21	0.28	7	0.46	12	0.36
Garcia 2007		69	0.37	74	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	23	0.29	41	0.11
Garcia 2007b		85	0.18	85	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	60	0.04	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		64	0.42	73	0.00	64	0.03	70	0.03	59	0.04	81	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.57	31	0.01	30	0.06	29	0.20	37	0.17	34	0.18
Groot 1988		19	0.60	21	0.01	26	0.06	26	0.24	32	0.19	28	0.21
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.58	8	0.03	11	0.07	9	0.39	24	0.28	15	0.33
Hatto 1993		78	0.31	88	0.00	57	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.14	57	0.06
Hatto 1997		67	0.39	77	0.00	47	0.04	51	0.04	27	0.20	45	0.09
Horowitz 1949		13	0.63	3	0.10	3	0.13	2	0.57	1	0.61	1	0.59
Indjic 1988		75	0.34	56	0.00	55	0.03	79	0.03	35	0.14	56	0.06
Kapell 1951		31	0.53	48	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	54	0.04	66	0.04
Kissin 1993		61	0.43	58	0.00	71	0.05	46	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.05
Kushner 1989		22	0.58	70	0.00	27	0.06	25	0.24	39	0.17	29	0.20
Luisada 1991		39	0.50	68	0.00	56	0.03	71	0.03	48	0.05	62	0.04
Lushtak 2004		32	0.53	86	0.00	21	0.07	22	0.28	45	0.07	38	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.64	27	0.01	10	0.08	7	0.40	25	0.28	14	0.33
Magaloff 1978		29	0.54	17	0.01	29	0.06	27	0.22	35	0.17	31	0.19
Magin 1975		34	0.52	37	0.00	28	0.05	28	0.20	15	0.27	24	0.23
Michalowski 1933		77	0.31	54	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	48	0.07	60	0.05
Milkina 1970		65	0.42	69	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.04	75	0.03
Mohovich 1999		26	0.57	50	0.00	25	0.06	23	0.27	32	0.15	30	0.20
Moravec 1969		35	0.52	6	0.04	14	0.07	30	0.19	24	0.30	23	0.24
Morozova 2008		1	0.70	2	0.14	2	0.19	3	0.53	1	0.47	3	0.50
Neighaus 1950		16	0.61	5	0.07	6	0.12	5	0.44	21	0.35	10	0.39
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.49	39	0.00	42	0.04	38	0.11	7	0.41	27	0.21
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.53	16	0.01	46	0.04	53	0.04	48	0.06	59	0.05
Osinska 1989		59	0.44	55	0.00	74	0.04	52	0.04	77	0.03	72	0.03
Pachmann 1927		79	0.29	44	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	65	0.04	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		76	0.33	52	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.03	76	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.63	15	0.02	12	0.10	6	0.42	8	0.43	6	0.42
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.46	46	0.00	62	0.04	48	0.04	37	0.14	51	0.07
Poblocka 1999		66	0.40	89	0.00	63	0.03	81	0.03	57	0.04	73	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.49	53	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	50	0.05	64	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		71	0.36	71	0.00	79	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.03	82	0.03
Richter 1976		46	0.49	75	0.00	52	0.03	72	0.03	38	0.10	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		63	0.43	64	0.00	69	0.04	47	0.04	50	0.04	68	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		18	0.60	35	0.00	19	0.07	18	0.32	8	0.51	8	0.40
Rosenthal 1931		43	0.49	49	0.00	48	0.04	62	0.04	22	0.34	39	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		54	0.46	19	0.01	39	0.05	42	0.10	23	0.28	35	0.17
Rosenthal 1931c		37	0.51	60	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.14	30	0.21	36	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		53	0.47	24	0.01	54	0.03	74	0.03	31	0.16	54	0.07
Rossi 2007		68	0.37	90	0.00	61	0.03	69	0.03	23	0.18	50	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.22	18	0.01	84	0.02	84	0.02	57	0.05	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		82	0.26	78	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		74	0.34	47	0.00	80	0.03	68	0.03	68	0.04	79	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		20	0.59	79	0.00	20	0.07	14	0.35	22	0.29	16	0.32
Shebanova 2002		81	0.26	63	0.00	82	0.03	66	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Smith 1975		28	0.54	87	0.00	36	0.04	31	0.18	46	0.06	43	0.10
Sokolov 2002		5	0.68	14	0.02	7	0.14	4	0.49	15	0.43	4	0.46
Sztompka 1959		49	0.48	22	0.01	60	0.04	60	0.04	44	0.13	52	0.07
Tomsic 1995		44	0.49	33	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.11	42	0.09	44	0.10
Uninsky 1932		15	0.62	9	0.02	17	0.07	10	0.38	4	0.51	5	0.44
Uninsky 1971		30	0.54	82	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	33	0.27	37	0.16
Wasowski 1980		27	0.57	26	0.01	43	0.05	40	0.10	16	0.31	32	0.18
Zak 1937		24	0.57	65	0.00	22	0.07	19	0.31	29	0.25	21	0.28
Zak 1951		17	0.61	23	0.01	18	0.06	13	0.36	22	0.33	13	0.34
Random 1		90	-0.14	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	57	0.04	87	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.11	84	0.00	88	0.01	87	0.01	59	0.03	86	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.11	62	0.00	87	0.01	88	0.01	70	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).