Harasiewicz 1955

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		47	0.47	82	0.00	48	0.05	45	0.05	44	0.08	65	0.06
Anderszewski 2003		36	0.54	4	0.04	4	0.07	13	0.38	14	0.46	12	0.42
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.55	16	0.02	23	0.07	20	0.33	21	0.34	21	0.33
Bacha 2000		83	0.21	74	0.00	76	0.03	86	0.03	41	0.11	64	0.06
Badura 1965		23	0.57	43	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.14	26	0.31	38	0.21
Barbosa 1983		49	0.47	78	0.00	60	0.05	46	0.05	61	0.04	72	0.04
Biret 1990		67	0.37	76	0.00	63	0.03	69	0.03	56	0.04	87	0.03
Blet 2003		46	0.48	67	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	48	0.05	73	0.04
Block 1995		37	0.53	31	0.01	32	0.05	32	0.19	8	0.38	29	0.27
Blumental 1952		77	0.25	14	0.02	82	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.04	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		39	0.53	42	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.16	12	0.37	35	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.55	70	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	25	0.28	44	0.12
Bunin 1987		4	0.64	10	0.03	11	0.07	4	0.45	7	0.49	5	0.47
Bunin 1987b		5	0.64	12	0.02	12	0.11	3	0.46	7	0.49	4	0.47
Chiu 1999		42	0.50	65	0.00	70	0.03	82	0.03	45	0.06	71	0.04
Cohen 1997		80	0.24	47	0.00	83	0.03	63	0.03	51	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		66	0.37	57	0.00	73	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.05	76	0.04
Csalog 1996		86	0.09	84	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		35	0.55	40	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	35	0.20	43	0.14
Czerny 1990		22	0.57	66	0.00	28	0.05	21	0.32	21	0.28	26	0.30
Duchoud 2007		59	0.42	85	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	45	0.06	69	0.05
Ezaki 2006		3	0.66	24	0.01	14	0.07	11	0.40	20	0.30	19	0.35
Falvay 1989		14	0.60	59	0.00	25	0.05	26	0.28	26	0.25	30	0.26
Farrell 1958		71	0.36	81	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	23	0.23	56	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		73	0.35	71	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	42	0.10	68	0.05
Fliere 1977		16	0.59	61	0.00	22	0.06	17	0.34	24	0.24	27	0.29
Fou 1978		27	0.56	17	0.02	26	0.05	28	0.25	23	0.36	24	0.30
Francois 1956		38	0.53	52	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.17	27	0.20	40	0.18
Friedman 1923		85	0.12	58	0.00	85	0.03	70	0.03	48	0.07	70	0.05
Friedman 1923b		84	0.12	63	0.00	84	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1930		61	0.41	38	0.00	68	0.03	85	0.03	33	0.18	60	0.07
Garcia 2007		68	0.37	32	0.01	65	0.03	74	0.03	7	0.47	46	0.12
Garcia 2007b		75	0.32	62	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	27	0.16	63	0.07
Gierzod 1998		45	0.48	89	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	26	0.21	50	0.10
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.56	41	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.24	23	0.28	32	0.26
Groot 1988		20	0.57	13	0.02	13	0.11	16	0.34	15	0.40	17	0.37
Harasiewicz 1955		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		79	0.24	26	0.01	57	0.03	71	0.03	31	0.17	62	0.07
Hatto 1997		76	0.26	48	0.00	56	0.04	52	0.04	31	0.16	58	0.08
Horowitz 1949		40	0.52	46	0.00	37	0.05	37	0.15	13	0.35	36	0.23
Indjic 1988		81	0.23	36	0.01	58	0.05	47	0.05	34	0.15	51	0.09
Kapell 1951		50	0.47	25	0.01	46	0.04	57	0.04	27	0.35	45	0.12
Kissin 1993		24	0.57	28	0.01	31	0.05	30	0.22	26	0.25	37	0.23
Kushner 1989		34	0.55	20	0.02	17	0.08	18	0.33	27	0.28	25	0.30
Luisada 1991		43	0.50	37	0.01	53	0.04	56	0.04	37	0.15	53	0.08
Lushtak 2004		6	0.64	33	0.01	15	0.08	2	0.46	12	0.46	7	0.46
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.63	1	0.22	1	0.22	1	0.56	4	0.57	1	0.56
Magaloff 1978		18	0.58	77	0.00	5	0.07	14	0.38	20	0.37	16	0.37
Magin 1975		26	0.56	44	0.00	20	0.06	25	0.28	8	0.37	22	0.32
Michalowski 1933		58	0.43	75	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	43	0.11	59	0.07
Milkina 1970		57	0.44	35	0.01	45	0.04	54	0.04	29	0.25	48	0.10
Mohovich 1999		12	0.61	3	0.05	2	0.08	5	0.45	9	0.46	10	0.45
Moravec 1969		65	0.37	50	0.00	74	0.03	73	0.03	68	0.03	78	0.03
Morozova 2008		21	0.57	64	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	43	0.10	49	0.10
Neighaus 1950		13	0.60	18	0.02	9	0.13	9	0.44	12	0.49	8	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		82	0.21	55	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	29	0.19	54	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		63	0.40	9	0.03	64	0.03	72	0.03	46	0.07	67	0.05
Osinska 1989		53	0.46	56	0.00	71	0.03	65	0.03	69	0.04	80	0.03
Pachmann 1927		64	0.39	68	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	24	0.32	47	0.11
Paderewski 1930		60	0.42	51	0.00	72	0.03	64	0.03	45	0.07	66	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		2	0.73	5	0.04	7	0.09	10	0.42	4	0.54	3	0.48
Pierdomenico 2008		7	0.63	29	0.01	24	0.05	27	0.27	12	0.36	23	0.31
Poblocka 1999		72	0.36	30	0.01	66	0.03	75	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.46	54	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	32	0.17	55	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.58	72	0.00	19	0.08	24	0.28	9	0.39	20	0.33
Rangell 2001		62	0.41	45	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	44	0.10	61	0.07
Richter 1976		11	0.62	6	0.03	10	0.09	12	0.40	2	0.50	9	0.45
Rosen 1989		48	0.47	73	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	39	0.19	52	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		55	0.46	11	0.03	39	0.06	34	0.16	18	0.42	31	0.26
Rosenthal 1931		31	0.55	34	0.01	27	0.05	23	0.29	7	0.50	15	0.38
Rosenthal 1931b		44	0.49	49	0.00	34	0.04	31	0.19	8	0.44	28	0.29
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.45	8	0.03	40	0.07	35	0.16	16	0.38	33	0.25
Rosenthal 1931d		52	0.46	87	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.07	14	0.36	42	0.16
Rossi 2007		29	0.55	15	0.02	35	0.04	40	0.12	6	0.32	39	0.20
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.03	53	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	65	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.33	22	0.01	80	0.03	66	0.03	56	0.05	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		78	0.25	69	0.00	78	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.05	74	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		10	0.62	60	0.00	21	0.07	15	0.37	10	0.41	14	0.39
Shebanova 2002		70	0.36	86	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.04	84	0.03
Smith 1975		1	0.74	7	0.03	6	0.09	6	0.44	6	0.37	13	0.40
Sokolov 2002		19	0.58	23	0.01	16	0.08	8	0.44	5	0.49	6	0.46
Sztompka 1959		51	0.47	79	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	36	0.17	57	0.08
Tomsic 1995		8	0.63	19	0.02	8	0.11	7	0.44	6	0.54	2	0.49
Uninsky 1932		25	0.56	27	0.01	36	0.04	38	0.14	18	0.42	34	0.24
Uninsky 1971		30	0.55	2	0.07	3	0.07	19	0.33	4	0.53	11	0.42
Wasowski 1980		69	0.36	21	0.01	67	0.03	68	0.03	56	0.04	79	0.03
Zak 1937		41	0.50	88	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.10	27	0.26	41	0.16
Zak 1951		15	0.60	39	0.00	18	0.07	22	0.32	16	0.40	18	0.36
Random 1		88	-0.11	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	59	0.04	88	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.18	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.12	80	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	68	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).