Rubinstein 1966

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.39	29	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.09	24	0.37	50	0.18
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.57	2	0.19	2	0.30	2	0.78	1	0.86	1	0.82
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.40	50	0.00	55	0.06	63	0.06	30	0.32	60	0.14
Bacha 2000		52	0.40	44	0.00	51	0.06	62	0.06	4	0.66	46	0.20
Badura 1965		60	0.38	55	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.11	9	0.54	40	0.24
Barbosa 1983		5	0.56	5	0.07	6	0.19	4	0.72	1	0.81	4	0.76
Biret 1990		58	0.38	86	0.00	58	0.07	51	0.07	23	0.48	51	0.18
Blet 2003		77	0.29	73	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.04	87	0.03
Block 1995		37	0.43	53	0.00	46	0.07	49	0.07	19	0.50	48	0.19
Blumental 1952		41	0.42	26	0.00	32	0.05	31	0.23	19	0.50	31	0.34
Boshniakovich 1969		39	0.43	17	0.01	21	0.13	20	0.45	17	0.55	22	0.50
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.38	46	0.00	65	0.08	47	0.08	25	0.40	49	0.18
Bunin 1987		80	0.28	66	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.05	82	0.04
Bunin 1987b		83	0.27	87	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.04	84	0.03
Chiu 1999		43	0.42	51	0.00	57	0.07	52	0.07	43	0.12	67	0.09
Cohen 1997		51	0.40	52	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.18	8	0.63	32	0.34
Cortot 1951		76	0.30	70	0.00	69	0.03	86	0.03	33	0.23	70	0.08
Csalog 1996		46	0.41	43	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.12	6	0.54	39	0.25
Czerny 1949		34	0.44	23	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.33	15	0.69	24	0.48
Czerny 1990		13	0.50	28	0.00	16	0.15	13	0.59	13	0.72	12	0.65
Duchoud 2007		64	0.36	74	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	28	0.31	65	0.11
Ezaki 2006		23	0.46	19	0.01	26	0.07	27	0.28	13	0.58	27	0.40
Falvay 1989		16	0.48	13	0.01	17	0.12	24	0.37	7	0.50	26	0.43
Farrell 1958		38	0.43	11	0.01	19	0.11	25	0.36	4	0.63	23	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		65	0.36	34	0.00	62	0.07	50	0.07	13	0.70	44	0.22
Fliere 1977		30	0.45	76	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.23	42	0.17	47	0.20
Fou 1978		10	0.53	6	0.05	9	0.24	12	0.61	3	0.72	10	0.66
Francois 1956		56	0.39	75	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.12	11	0.68	36	0.29
Friedman 1923		73	0.33	35	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	46	0.07	79	0.05
Friedman 1923b		75	0.31	22	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	58	0.05	83	0.04
Friedman 1930		78	0.29	78	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.04	88	0.03
Garcia 2007		47	0.41	39	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.13	6	0.64	35	0.29
Garcia 2007b		70	0.34	57	0.00	27	0.07	37	0.16	18	0.51	37	0.29
Gierzod 1998		19	0.48	32	0.00	20	0.13	17	0.50	10	0.62	17	0.56
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.44	38	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.09	13	0.56	45	0.22
Groot 1988		42	0.42	49	0.00	30	0.06	36	0.17	30	0.34	41	0.24
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.56	45	0.00	7	0.18	6	0.72	2	0.69	9	0.70
Hatto 1993		14	0.50	41	0.00	13	0.17	15	0.55	14	0.54	18	0.54
Hatto 1997		12	0.52	15	0.01	11	0.17	10	0.66	4	0.67	11	0.66
Horowitz 1949		81	0.27	81	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Indjic 1988		17	0.48	12	0.01	15	0.14	18	0.49	18	0.54	20	0.51
Kapell 1951		11	0.52	10	0.02	12	0.20	11	0.63	4	0.59	13	0.61
Kissin 1993		15	0.49	18	0.01	14	0.15	14	0.56	16	0.62	14	0.59
Kushner 1989		3	0.57	4	0.07	4	0.19	7	0.71	6	0.69	8	0.70
Luisada 1991		53	0.39	79	0.00	60	0.07	59	0.07	38	0.15	66	0.10
Lushtak 2004		7	0.55	9	0.02	5	0.18	8	0.69	1	0.78	6	0.73
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.44	27	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.38	18	0.50	25	0.44
Magaloff 1978		50	0.40	67	0.00	53	0.08	46	0.08	29	0.28	59	0.15
Magin 1975		54	0.39	58	0.00	56	0.08	48	0.08	30	0.36	52	0.17
Michalowski 1933		87	0.20	83	0.00	87	0.04	68	0.04	59	0.06	78	0.05
Milkina 1970		9	0.53	7	0.04	8	0.22	5	0.72	3	0.79	5	0.75
Mohovich 1999		2	0.58	3	0.09	3	0.24	1	0.79	1	0.84	2	0.81
Moravec 1969		36	0.44	64	0.00	52	0.07	56	0.07	23	0.33	58	0.15
Morozova 2008		22	0.46	30	0.00	34	0.08	29	0.23	22	0.48	33	0.33
Neighaus 1950		44	0.42	63	0.00	49	0.06	64	0.06	14	0.48	56	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		79	0.29	62	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	57	0.05	81	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.43	14	0.01	50	0.06	60	0.06	32	0.28	61	0.13
Osinska 1989		18	0.48	21	0.00	18	0.14	16	0.53	13	0.59	16	0.56
Pachmann 1927		85	0.26	60	0.00	86	0.03	71	0.03	68	0.04	86	0.03
Paderewski 1930		82	0.27	72	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	33	0.35	63	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.37	80	0.00	66	0.04	66	0.04	38	0.18	68	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.34	48	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	30	0.24	69	0.08
Poblocka 1999		28	0.45	16	0.01	33	0.07	28	0.27	14	0.54	28	0.38
Rabcewiczowa 1932		31	0.44	42	0.00	22	0.14	19	0.47	7	0.68	15	0.57
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.34	84	0.00	63	0.07	53	0.07	51	0.06	74	0.06
Rangell 2001		20	0.47	25	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.43	3	0.66	19	0.53
Richter 1976		27	0.45	47	0.00	48	0.07	57	0.07	28	0.40	54	0.17
Rosen 1989		26	0.45	54	0.00	47	0.06	65	0.06	25	0.29	62	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.33	24	0.00	82	0.03	88	0.03	44	0.12	76	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		62	0.38	40	0.00	64	0.07	54	0.07	13	0.69	43	0.22
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.35	77	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	14	0.62	57	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.35	82	0.00	70	0.03	77	0.03	32	0.24	71	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.26	61	0.00	84	0.03	74	0.03	41	0.13	77	0.06
Rossi 2007		86	0.24	90	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	20	0.39	64	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		8	0.54	8	0.03	10	0.24	9	0.68	2	0.76	7	0.72
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.59	1	0.26	1	0.26	3	0.78	1	0.83	3	0.80
Rubinstein 1966		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.34	65	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	40	0.13	75	0.06
Shebanova 2002		24	0.46	20	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.23	26	0.44	34	0.32
Smith 1975		48	0.41	56	0.00	59	0.10	43	0.10	17	0.51	42	0.23
Sokolov 2002		74	0.32	68	0.00	73	0.03	85	0.03	54	0.05	80	0.04
Sztompka 1959		35	0.44	59	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.15	20	0.48	38	0.27
Tomsic 1995		45	0.41	36	0.00	45	0.06	61	0.06	12	0.47	53	0.17
Uninsky 1932		57	0.38	71	0.00	54	0.07	58	0.07	23	0.40	55	0.17
Uninsky 1971		21	0.47	69	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.43	8	0.58	21	0.50
Wasowski 1980		59	0.38	33	0.00	61	0.07	55	0.07	61	0.05	73	0.06
Zak 1937		29	0.45	37	0.00	35	0.06	34	0.21	11	0.57	29	0.35
Zak 1951		25	0.46	31	0.00	29	0.06	33	0.23	9	0.54	30	0.35
Random 1		90	-0.09	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.03	85	0.00	88	0.03	87	0.03	35	0.18	72	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.09	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).