Bunin 1987b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		70	0.26	49	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		77	0.24	50	0.00	68	0.03	85	0.03	70	0.04	75	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.40	28	0.00	27	0.10	24	0.41	34	0.27	18	0.33
Bacha 2000		75	0.24	51	0.00	66	0.03	76	0.03	60	0.04	70	0.03
Badura 1965		57	0.29	20	0.00	47	0.07	47	0.07	55	0.04	55	0.05
Barbosa 1983		11	0.40	52	0.00	10	0.10	12	0.51	38	0.21	17	0.33
Biret 1990		40	0.32	53	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.19	51	0.06	40	0.11
Blet 2003		18	0.38	54	0.00	11	0.12	10	0.53	17	0.48	5	0.50
Block 1995		66	0.27	15	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.05	64	0.04
Blumental 1952		47	0.31	55	0.00	44	0.08	43	0.16	57	0.06	44	0.10
Boshniakovich 1969		26	0.35	16	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.33	61	0.05	34	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.25	56	0.00	81	0.04	67	0.04	64	0.05	58	0.04
Bunin 1987		1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Bunin 1987b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		22	0.37	21	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.41	25	0.27	16	0.33
Cohen 1997		81	0.22	7	0.00	76	0.03	87	0.03	69	0.03	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.15	57	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.02	90	0.02
Csalog 1996		36	0.33	29	0.00	39	0.06	36	0.23	30	0.22	28	0.22
Czerny 1949		59	0.28	58	0.00	78	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.05	62	0.04
Czerny 1990		16	0.38	5	0.00	26	0.09	22	0.42	42	0.15	26	0.25
Duchoud 2007		49	0.31	13	0.00	21	0.14	23	0.42	14	0.47	11	0.44
Ezaki 2006		35	0.34	11	0.00	32	0.08	33	0.27	76	0.04	41	0.10
Falvay 1989		20	0.37	59	0.00	14	0.10	20	0.42	45	0.08	30	0.18
Farrell 1958		32	0.34	60	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.24	55	0.06	38	0.12
Ferenczy 1958		83	0.21	61	0.00	84	0.03	73	0.03	74	0.04	77	0.03
Fliere 1977		4	0.43	30	0.00	2	0.21	9	0.53	35	0.26	13	0.37
Fou 1978		69	0.26	62	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Francois 1956		78	0.24	22	0.00	71	0.03	84	0.03	70	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923		68	0.26	31	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.06	57	0.05
Friedman 1923b		58	0.28	63	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	47	0.07	49	0.06
Friedman 1930		37	0.33	3	0.00	20	0.09	15	0.47	24	0.46	9	0.46
Garcia 2007		45	0.32	17	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.13	36	0.16	33	0.14
Garcia 2007b		10	0.41	8	0.00	7	0.10	4	0.59	10	0.65	2	0.62
Gierzod 1998		72	0.26	14	0.00	70	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.04	80	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.32	32	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	60	0.05	56	0.05
Groot 1988		9	0.41	23	0.00	5	0.17	16	0.47	31	0.28	14	0.36
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.29	64	0.00	69	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.04	83	0.03
Hatto 1993		21	0.37	65	0.00	16	0.15	13	0.50	43	0.14	24	0.26
Hatto 1997		27	0.35	66	0.00	15	0.09	14	0.48	36	0.21	20	0.32
Horowitz 1949		7	0.42	67	0.00	17	0.09	21	0.42	11	0.58	6	0.49
Indjic 1988		19	0.37	68	0.00	12	0.12	11	0.53	36	0.23	15	0.35
Kapell 1951		3	0.44	2	0.00	8	0.10	3	0.61	28	0.29	12	0.42
Kissin 1993		73	0.25	24	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	78	0.04	73	0.03
Kushner 1989		15	0.38	69	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.40	46	0.08	31	0.18
Luisada 1991		6	0.42	18	0.00	13	0.11	8	0.55	19	0.41	7	0.47
Lushtak 2004		28	0.35	6	0.00	25	0.09	17	0.45	31	0.23	21	0.32
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.45	70	0.00	3	0.13	2	0.68	26	0.44	4	0.55
Magaloff 1978		39	0.33	71	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	65	0.04	48	0.06
Magin 1975		31	0.34	33	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.21	57	0.05	43	0.10
Michalowski 1933		79	0.24	25	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	46	0.07	54	0.05
Milkina 1970		53	0.29	4	0.00	58	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.05	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		67	0.27	72	0.00	63	0.04	66	0.04	81	0.04	65	0.04
Moravec 1969		17	0.38	73	0.00	30	0.09	32	0.31	60	0.05	35	0.12
Morozova 2008		14	0.40	74	0.00	9	0.10	7	0.56	28	0.40	8	0.47
Neighaus 1950		62	0.27	75	0.00	67	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	82	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		48	0.31	9	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	38	0.20	37	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.33	34	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.18	80	0.03	46	0.07
Osinska 1989		41	0.32	35	0.00	40	0.07	34	0.25	71	0.04	42	0.10
Pachmann 1927		50	0.31	26	0.00	48	0.09	46	0.09	34	0.24	32	0.15
Paderewski 1930		80	0.23	76	0.00	72	0.03	86	0.03	61	0.04	72	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.32	36	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	45	0.08	47	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.26	77	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	67	0.04	71	0.03
Poblocka 1999		25	0.35	78	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.21	46	0.07	36	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		52	0.30	37	0.00	54	0.05	57	0.05	50	0.06	51	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		5	0.43	38	0.00	4	0.13	6	0.58	16	0.52	3	0.55
Rangell 2001		54	0.29	39	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.04	66	0.04
Richter 1976		42	0.32	19	0.00	33	0.08	31	0.32	41	0.20	25	0.25
Rosen 1989		51	0.30	79	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.20	75	0.03	45	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.27	27	0.00	80	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.05	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.18	40	0.00	85	0.04	65	0.04	77	0.03	74	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.21	10	0.00	83	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		64	0.27	41	0.00	64	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.24	80	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	54	0.05	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.19	42	0.00	82	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.04	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.31	43	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.27	44	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	64	0.04	69	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		65	0.27	81	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.03	76	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		30	0.34	12	0.00	29	0.08	30	0.32	26	0.32	19	0.32
Shebanova 2002		8	0.41	82	0.00	6	0.09	5	0.59	32	0.34	10	0.45
Smith 1975		87	0.13	83	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Sokolov 2002		60	0.28	84	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	51	0.05	59	0.04
Sztompka 1959		29	0.34	85	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.05	53	0.05
Tomsic 1995		34	0.34	86	0.00	18	0.09	27	0.39	31	0.23	22	0.30
Uninsky 1932		33	0.34	87	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.18	44	0.08	39	0.12
Uninsky 1971		55	0.29	45	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	77	0.03	61	0.04
Wasowski 1980		13	0.40	88	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.44	42	0.10	29	0.21
Zak 1937		24	0.36	46	0.00	22	0.09	28	0.37	39	0.15	27	0.24
Zak 1951		23	0.37	47	0.00	19	0.09	19	0.42	37	0.19	23	0.28
Random 1		89	-0.03	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	65	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.03	48	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	48	0.06	78	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.07	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).