Badura 1965

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.37	12	0.01	15	0.09	15	0.46	30	0.30	9	0.37
Anderszewski 2003		3	0.42	2	0.14	2	0.30	4	0.62	16	0.57	2	0.59
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.38	17	0.01	14	0.12	13	0.47	40	0.19	11	0.30
Bacha 2000		41	0.30	39	0.00	41	0.06	32	0.20	24	0.30	14	0.24
Badura 1965		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Barbosa 1983		59	0.28	87	0.00	69	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.04	79	0.03
Biret 1990		75	0.22	56	0.00	71	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03	82	0.03
Blet 2003		44	0.30	24	0.00	39	0.05	45	0.09	55	0.05	47	0.07
Block 1995		24	0.34	79	0.00	28	0.06	21	0.34	57	0.05	31	0.13
Blumental 1952		30	0.33	48	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	61	0.05	54	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		28	0.33	65	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.41	82	0.04	32	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		23	0.34	13	0.01	25	0.06	26	0.29	37	0.18	17	0.23
Bunin 1987		61	0.27	47	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	44	0.10	49	0.06
Bunin 1987b		52	0.29	69	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	47	0.07	52	0.05
Chiu 1999		38	0.31	23	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.21	47	0.06	34	0.11
Cohen 1997		78	0.22	85	0.00	78	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.04	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		84	0.18	57	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	70	0.04	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		25	0.34	34	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.25	56	0.06	33	0.12
Czerny 1949		79	0.22	89	0.00	80	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.06	53	0.05
Czerny 1990		36	0.31	25	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.22	70	0.04	39	0.09
Duchoud 2007		68	0.25	30	0.00	21	0.08	27	0.29	31	0.25	13	0.27
Ezaki 2006		11	0.38	8	0.02	16	0.09	16	0.45	46	0.09	19	0.20
Falvay 1989		13	0.37	7	0.02	11	0.15	10	0.53	47	0.06	21	0.18
Farrell 1958		64	0.26	68	0.00	74	0.04	60	0.04	58	0.06	51	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		37	0.31	10	0.02	44	0.06	43	0.11	29	0.53	16	0.24
Fliere 1977		12	0.38	35	0.00	22	0.07	23	0.33	83	0.03	35	0.10
Fou 1978		2	0.43	3	0.12	4	0.30	2	0.69	21	0.45	3	0.56
Francois 1956		86	0.17	43	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923		10	0.38	31	0.00	9	0.14	8	0.55	17	0.54	5	0.54
Friedman 1923b		6	0.39	21	0.01	7	0.20	7	0.57	22	0.52	4	0.54
Friedman 1930		17	0.35	26	0.00	24	0.06	20	0.36	39	0.13	18	0.22
Garcia 2007		81	0.21	52	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	63	0.05	62	0.04
Garcia 2007b		76	0.22	58	0.00	70	0.02	85	0.02	46	0.06	87	0.03
Gierzod 1998		5	0.39	14	0.01	6	0.20	3	0.66	28	0.31	6	0.45
Gornostaeva 1994		58	0.28	74	0.00	56	0.04	52	0.04	56	0.05	65	0.04
Groot 1988		33	0.32	18	0.01	36	0.06	42	0.11	87	0.03	50	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.34	44	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	58	0.05	69	0.04
Hatto 1993		21	0.34	86	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	72	0.04	68	0.04
Hatto 1997		32	0.32	38	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.16	68	0.04	44	0.08
Horowitz 1949		83	0.19	46	0.00	82	0.03	68	0.03	73	0.03	78	0.03
Indjic 1988		26	0.33	61	0.00	47	0.10	44	0.10	67	0.05	46	0.07
Kapell 1951		69	0.25	60	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	72	0.04	77	0.03
Kissin 1993		18	0.35	71	0.00	23	0.09	25	0.31	53	0.07	27	0.15
Kushner 1989		4	0.40	4	0.12	3	0.26	5	0.62	30	0.30	7	0.43
Luisada 1991		48	0.29	33	0.00	66	0.02	87	0.02	69	0.05	71	0.03
Lushtak 2004		45	0.30	62	0.00	17	0.07	22	0.34	37	0.10	23	0.18
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.38	6	0.04	10	0.15	11	0.52	40	0.17	10	0.30
Magaloff 1978		54	0.29	36	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	86	0.03	74	0.03
Magin 1975		40	0.30	75	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	58	0.05	57	0.04
Michalowski 1933		73	0.23	54	0.00	68	0.03	83	0.03	65	0.05	61	0.04
Milkina 1970		27	0.33	55	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.31	50	0.07	26	0.15
Mohovich 1999		60	0.28	82	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	62	0.04	64	0.04
Moravec 1969		49	0.29	50	0.00	61	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.03
Morozova 2008		1	0.43	1	0.26	1	0.26	1	0.71	11	0.54	1	0.62
Neighaus 1950		72	0.24	66	0.00	62	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.26	5	0.05	40	0.05	39	0.14	42	0.13	30	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.36	15	0.01	5	0.19	6	0.57	23	0.33	8	0.43
Osinska 1989		51	0.29	59	0.00	32	0.06	34	0.17	53	0.05	36	0.09
Pachmann 1927		65	0.26	64	0.00	53	0.04	51	0.04	39	0.15	43	0.08
Paderewski 1930		82	0.19	49	0.00	83	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.05	59	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.29	53	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	71	0.04	55	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		85	0.17	90	0.00	86	0.03	67	0.03	70	0.04	76	0.03
Poblocka 1999		35	0.31	32	0.00	37	0.05	41	0.13	65	0.05	41	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		77	0.22	45	0.00	75	0.03	70	0.03	62	0.05	58	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		50	0.29	41	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.04
Rangell 2001		66	0.26	63	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	59	0.05	66	0.04
Richter 1976		34	0.32	20	0.01	35	0.05	40	0.13	63	0.05	42	0.08
Rosen 1989		22	0.34	83	0.00	13	0.11	14	0.46	54	0.05	28	0.15
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.29	51	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	57	0.05	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		39	0.31	22	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.15	20	0.56	12	0.29
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.28	40	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	22	0.50	29	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.25	72	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.21	81	0.00	79	0.04	59	0.04	57	0.05	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.08	70	0.00	87	0.03	69	0.03	68	0.04	73	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.30	80	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	48	0.05	48	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.23	73	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.38	9	0.02	8	0.17	9	0.54	42	0.11	15	0.24
Schilhawsky 1960		63	0.26	42	0.00	60	0.03	65	0.03	64	0.04	80	0.03
Shebanova 2002		19	0.34	88	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.40	46	0.08	22	0.18
Smith 1975		67	0.26	28	0.00	65	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03
Sokolov 2002		71	0.24	67	0.00	81	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03
Sztompka 1959		55	0.29	77	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	70	0.04	60	0.04
Tomsic 1995		29	0.33	16	0.01	20	0.09	17	0.41	56	0.06	25	0.16
Uninsky 1932		31	0.32	11	0.02	29	0.07	31	0.20	38	0.14	24	0.17
Uninsky 1971		16	0.36	29	0.00	12	0.13	12	0.50	45	0.08	20	0.20
Wasowski 1980		46	0.30	37	0.00	34	0.06	33	0.17	83	0.04	40	0.08
Zak 1937		56	0.29	27	0.00	43	0.07	38	0.15	58	0.05	37	0.09
Zak 1951		42	0.30	19	0.01	42	0.06	35	0.16	53	0.05	38	0.09
Random 1		88	-0.01	76	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	28	0.30	45	0.08
Random 2		89	-0.08	84	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.08	78	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	69	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).