Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		64	0.32	42	0.00	71	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.03	81	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.31	45	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.50	14	0.01	10	0.19	9	0.65	9	0.65	6	0.65
Bacha 2000		79	0.22	90	0.00	79	0.04	75	0.04	58	0.05	71	0.04
Badura 1965		69	0.30	76	0.00	73	0.05	58	0.05	66	0.03	77	0.04
Barbosa 1983		32	0.40	18	0.00	25	0.07	21	0.45	47	0.08	35	0.19
Biret 1990		70	0.30	11	0.01	66	0.05	60	0.05	56	0.05	69	0.05
Blet 2003		15	0.45	12	0.01	22	0.10	25	0.40	8	0.55	18	0.47
Block 1995		58	0.34	44	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.08	53	0.07
Blumental 1952		27	0.41	59	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.35	30	0.32	30	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.45	21	0.00	16	0.07	22	0.43	34	0.27	29	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		81	0.21	88	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03
Bunin 1987		50	0.35	70	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	37	0.19	41	0.14
Bunin 1987b		56	0.34	82	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	38	0.21	46	0.10
Chiu 1999		40	0.39	23	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.23	33	0.18	33	0.20
Cohen 1997		75	0.24	49	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.15	77	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		25	0.42	51	0.00	29	0.11	31	0.35	18	0.39	28	0.37
Czerny 1949		71	0.28	84	0.00	68	0.05	61	0.05	46	0.08	58	0.06
Czerny 1990		24	0.42	48	0.00	13	0.17	12	0.58	28	0.50	13	0.54
Duchoud 2007		63	0.32	55	0.00	61	0.04	64	0.04	37	0.14	52	0.07
Ezaki 2006		68	0.31	80	0.00	69	0.04	80	0.04	58	0.06	60	0.05
Falvay 1989		34	0.39	41	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.18	51	0.06	45	0.10
Farrell 1958		78	0.23	62	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.03	79	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.09	87	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.53	6	0.02	5	0.20	4	0.72	17	0.49	9	0.59
Fou 1978		42	0.38	22	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.07	55	0.06
Francois 1956		65	0.31	39	0.00	67	0.04	73	0.04	27	0.27	48	0.10
Friedman 1923		60	0.33	31	0.00	58	0.04	70	0.04	44	0.10	59	0.06
Friedman 1923b		59	0.33	83	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	40	0.18	50	0.09
Friedman 1930		20	0.43	13	0.01	14	0.11	13	0.57	16	0.55	11	0.56
Garcia 2007		73	0.27	86	0.00	65	0.04	76	0.04	52	0.05	76	0.04
Garcia 2007b		16	0.45	7	0.02	12	0.14	14	0.56	5	0.69	8	0.62
Gierzod 1998		48	0.37	43	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.32	42	0.13	34	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.38	57	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	39	0.13	44	0.12
Groot 1988		2	0.54	4	0.10	3	0.23	6	0.66	6	0.59	7	0.62
Harasiewicz 1955		14	0.46	46	0.00	18	0.08	16	0.54	50	0.06	36	0.18
Hatto 1993		7	0.51	24	0.00	6	0.24	2	0.75	7	0.66	3	0.70
Hatto 1997		28	0.41	54	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.50	27	0.31	24	0.39
Horowitz 1949		62	0.32	29	0.00	70	0.04	74	0.04	47	0.06	64	0.05
Indjic 1988		5	0.51	2	0.24	2	0.31	1	0.76	6	0.72	2	0.74
Kapell 1951		26	0.41	73	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.42	33	0.22	31	0.30
Kissin 1993		6	0.51	3	0.10	7	0.39	5	0.71	6	0.80	1	0.75
Kushner 1989		9	0.50	50	0.00	9	0.13	10	0.63	21	0.42	15	0.51
Luisada 1991		11	0.48	16	0.01	15	0.10	15	0.54	11	0.54	12	0.54
Lushtak 2004		57	0.34	66	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	46	0.06	66	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.46	27	0.00	11	0.18	11	0.59	24	0.45	14	0.52
Magaloff 1978		33	0.40	81	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.31	45	0.07	38	0.15
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		29	0.41	8	0.01	31	0.10	38	0.23	4	0.63	26	0.38
Milkina 1970		49	0.36	40	0.00	47	0.05	59	0.05	47	0.08	56	0.06
Mohovich 1999		52	0.35	71	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	63	0.04	68	0.05
Moravec 1969		47	0.37	72	0.00	52	0.06	50	0.06	63	0.05	61	0.05
Morozova 2008		46	0.37	68	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.19	58	0.05	47	0.10
Neighaus 1950		67	0.31	26	0.00	60	0.04	78	0.04	80	0.03	86	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		41	0.38	56	0.00	42	0.08	39	0.19	20	0.38	32	0.27
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.44	35	0.00	23	0.07	20	0.45	24	0.32	25	0.38
Osinska 1989		39	0.39	32	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.28	67	0.05	42	0.12
Pachmann 1927		31	0.40	34	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.30	8	0.61	22	0.43
Paderewski 1930		38	0.39	38	0.00	48	0.04	71	0.04	19	0.52	40	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		18	0.44	15	0.01	27	0.08	26	0.37	11	0.53	20	0.44
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.32	53	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	38	0.14	51	0.08
Poblocka 1999		55	0.34	52	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.06	62	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		77	0.24	89	0.00	75	0.05	63	0.05	68	0.04	73	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		72	0.28	60	0.00	76	0.06	52	0.06	67	0.04	63	0.05
Rangell 2001		82	0.20	30	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.02	88	0.02
Richter 1976		4	0.53	5	0.04	4	0.24	7	0.66	10	0.68	5	0.67
Rosen 1989		53	0.34	58	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.04	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.22	65	0.00	86	0.04	79	0.04	80	0.03	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.20	67	0.00	81	0.04	77	0.04	66	0.04	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.18	74	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.24	69	0.00	77	0.07	46	0.07	74	0.03	70	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.16	64	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		74	0.26	25	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	19	0.39	43	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		51	0.35	78	0.00	49	0.04	69	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.55	1	0.31	1	0.30	3	0.73	6	0.67	4	0.70
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.39	33	0.00	34	0.11	30	0.36	48	0.08	37	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.34	85	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.17	49	0.09
Shebanova 2002		10	0.49	10	0.01	8	0.26	8	0.66	16	0.52	10	0.59
Smith 1975		21	0.43	37	0.00	28	0.09	29	0.36	13	0.58	19	0.46
Sokolov 2002		23	0.42	20	0.00	30	0.10	27	0.37	7	0.60	16	0.47
Sztompka 1959		37	0.39	63	0.00	56	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.06	57	0.06
Tomsic 1995		44	0.38	28	0.00	39	0.07	42	0.17	41	0.14	39	0.15
Uninsky 1932		35	0.39	36	0.00	24	0.07	28	0.37	24	0.39	27	0.38
Uninsky 1971		45	0.37	47	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	70	0.04	65	0.05
Wasowski 1980		13	0.46	9	0.01	17	0.08	17	0.51	31	0.37	21	0.43
Zak 1937		30	0.41	19	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.40	19	0.42	23	0.41
Zak 1951		22	0.42	17	0.01	21	0.09	19	0.46	13	0.48	17	0.47
Random 1		88	-0.01	79	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	35	0.24	54	0.07
Random 2		89	-0.02	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.03	87	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.03	61	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	42	0.12	83	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).