Ashkenazy 1981

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		31	0.42	11	0.01	29	0.08	31	0.31	25	0.35	31	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		70	0.29	69	0.00	60	0.05	66	0.05	47	0.07	60	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bacha 2000		17	0.45	33	0.00	15	0.11	21	0.49	3	0.69	16	0.58
Badura 1965		50	0.38	19	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.19	13	0.47	33	0.30
Barbosa 1983		45	0.38	76	0.00	59	0.06	59	0.06	60	0.06	58	0.06
Biret 1990		66	0.31	45	0.00	72	0.04	77	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.04
Blet 2003		21	0.43	68	0.00	32	0.08	28	0.35	12	0.51	25	0.42
Block 1995		54	0.36	61	0.00	35	0.07	38	0.22	54	0.06	47	0.11
Blumental 1952		32	0.41	28	0.00	30	0.06	32	0.31	34	0.23	36	0.27
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.40	36	0.00	26	0.11	27	0.37	39	0.20	37	0.27
Brailowsky 1960		81	0.22	55	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.05	71	0.04
Bunin 1987		30	0.42	62	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.33	17	0.49	26	0.40
Bunin 1987b		36	0.40	59	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.27	24	0.41	30	0.33
Chiu 1999		24	0.43	20	0.00	33	0.07	35	0.25	35	0.17	38	0.21
Cohen 1997		79	0.25	58	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		85	0.18	82	0.00	84	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		67	0.31	81	0.00	64	0.07	52	0.07	53	0.06	59	0.06
Czerny 1949		84	0.19	84	0.00	86	0.04	78	0.04	84	0.02	82	0.03
Czerny 1990		15	0.48	23	0.00	21	0.15	16	0.56	27	0.50	20	0.53
Duchoud 2007		43	0.39	38	0.00	42	0.08	41	0.19	16	0.45	34	0.29
Ezaki 2006		65	0.31	71	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04
Falvay 1989		26	0.43	49	0.00	46	0.10	45	0.10	50	0.06	51	0.08
Farrell 1958		78	0.25	22	0.00	74	0.03	86	0.03	80	0.02	87	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.12	60	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.03
Fliere 1977		11	0.50	41	0.00	17	0.13	15	0.60	38	0.24	27	0.38
Fou 1978		3	0.54	15	0.01	6	0.22	3	0.72	5	0.67	3	0.69
Francois 1956		74	0.27	32	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	67	0.04	86	0.03
Friedman 1923		27	0.43	46	0.00	20	0.12	18	0.54	7	0.67	15	0.60
Friedman 1923b		25	0.43	26	0.00	19	0.20	17	0.56	6	0.70	11	0.63
Friedman 1930		22	0.43	14	0.01	18	0.15	19	0.54	8	0.63	17	0.58
Garcia 2007		73	0.27	51	0.00	66	0.05	71	0.05	58	0.05	67	0.05
Garcia 2007b		42	0.39	13	0.01	39	0.06	42	0.18	23	0.43	35	0.28
Gierzod 1998		49	0.38	89	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.16	66	0.05	49	0.09
Gornostaeva 1994		72	0.28	80	0.00	80	0.05	72	0.05	85	0.03	76	0.04
Groot 1988		12	0.49	24	0.00	10	0.14	11	0.64	12	0.50	18	0.57
Harasiewicz 1955		35	0.40	30	0.00	51	0.08	48	0.08	59	0.05	63	0.06
Hatto 1993		8	0.51	17	0.01	4	0.25	5	0.69	8	0.62	9	0.65
Hatto 1997		37	0.40	79	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.22	79	0.04	48	0.09
Horowitz 1949		19	0.44	6	0.02	13	0.11	20	0.51	1	0.71	14	0.60
Indjic 1988		6	0.51	7	0.01	5	0.17	6	0.69	11	0.62	7	0.65
Kapell 1951		41	0.39	31	0.00	50	0.06	58	0.06	48	0.08	54	0.07
Kissin 1993		2	0.59	2	0.13	2	0.41	2	0.83	7	0.80	1	0.81
Kushner 1989		5	0.54	5	0.02	8	0.21	4	0.70	16	0.52	13	0.60
Luisada 1991		7	0.51	35	0.00	9	0.17	8	0.65	5	0.68	5	0.66
Lushtak 2004		69	0.30	56	0.00	55	0.06	60	0.06	44	0.07	62	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.44	8	0.01	22	0.13	25	0.41	35	0.25	32	0.32
Magaloff 1978		59	0.35	85	0.00	58	0.06	62	0.06	85	0.03	72	0.04
Magin 1975		10	0.50	9	0.01	11	0.13	9	0.65	9	0.65	6	0.65
Michalowski 1933		53	0.37	16	0.01	27	0.11	26	0.39	1	0.70	21	0.52
Milkina 1970		62	0.34	72	0.00	62	0.07	56	0.07	67	0.04	65	0.05
Mohovich 1999		63	0.33	63	0.00	57	0.06	57	0.06	57	0.05	68	0.05
Moravec 1969		39	0.40	83	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.21	51	0.06	44	0.11
Morozova 2008		16	0.46	10	0.01	16	0.11	14	0.61	21	0.48	19	0.54
Neighaus 1950		29	0.42	50	0.00	25	0.12	22	0.47	16	0.45	23	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		14	0.48	3	0.10	3	0.32	12	0.63	1	0.74	4	0.68
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.45	43	0.00	24	0.14	23	0.47	14	0.42	24	0.44
Osinska 1989		76	0.26	77	0.00	79	0.04	79	0.04	84	0.03	78	0.03
Pachmann 1927		47	0.38	57	0.00	48	0.07	54	0.07	20	0.45	40	0.18
Paderewski 1930		51	0.38	34	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.23	7	0.63	28	0.38
Perlemuter 1992		40	0.39	48	0.00	34	0.07	33	0.27	18	0.45	29	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.35	74	0.00	67	0.05	69	0.05	61	0.04	73	0.04
Poblocka 1999		61	0.34	75	0.00	61	0.07	53	0.07	63	0.05	56	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		83	0.20	78	0.00	83	0.05	68	0.05	71	0.04	74	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		33	0.41	12	0.01	23	0.12	24	0.45	15	0.52	22	0.48
Rangell 2001		71	0.28	65	0.00	78	0.04	76	0.04	87	0.02	85	0.03
Richter 1976		4	0.54	4	0.08	7	0.18	7	0.67	16	0.61	10	0.64
Rosen 1989		60	0.34	73	0.00	63	0.06	65	0.06	85	0.03	75	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		64	0.33	53	0.00	69	0.05	67	0.05	42	0.18	50	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.23	86	0.00	76	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.07	66	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.26	44	0.00	68	0.05	70	0.05	28	0.44	41	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.30	64	0.00	70	0.06	61	0.06	60	0.05	69	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.22	54	0.00	71	0.05	73	0.05	40	0.14	52	0.08
Rossi 2007		86	0.15	67	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	71	0.04	79	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.35	70	0.00	56	0.07	51	0.07	50	0.05	57	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.38	29	0.00	52	0.08	49	0.08	45	0.09	53	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		34	0.40	37	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.32	63	0.06	43	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960		56	0.35	52	0.00	65	0.06	64	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.06
Shebanova 2002		1	0.60	1	0.49	1	0.48	1	0.85	3	0.78	2	0.81
Smith 1975		77	0.26	87	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03
Sokolov 2002		44	0.38	40	0.00	53	0.08	50	0.08	40	0.15	45	0.11
Sztompka 1959		9	0.50	25	0.00	14	0.11	13	0.62	12	0.61	12	0.61
Tomsic 1995		48	0.38	39	0.00	47	0.07	55	0.07	40	0.18	46	0.11
Uninsky 1932		13	0.49	18	0.01	12	0.10	10	0.64	9	0.67	8	0.65
Uninsky 1971		55	0.36	66	0.00	49	0.09	47	0.09	51	0.06	55	0.07
Wasowski 1980		52	0.37	42	0.00	54	0.06	63	0.06	55	0.05	64	0.05
Zak 1937		23	0.43	21	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.16	31	0.22	39	0.19
Zak 1951		28	0.43	27	0.00	45	0.10	46	0.10	34	0.20	42	0.14
Random 1		88	-0.02	47	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	50	0.04	83	0.03
Random 2		89	-0.03	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	70	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.06	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).