Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		59	0.29	84	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	83	0.03	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.33	60	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.49	32	0.35	15	0.41
Ashkenazy 1981		61	0.28	61	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	76	0.04	83	0.03
Bacha 2000		52	0.30	30	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	27	0.27	39	0.13
Badura 1965		66	0.26	64	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.04	71	0.04
Barbosa 1983		10	0.42	3	0.09	7	0.16	7	0.59	45	0.10	24	0.24
Biret 1990		54	0.30	32	0.00	50	0.07	45	0.07	57	0.05	53	0.06
Blet 2003		72	0.26	45	0.00	68	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	79	0.03
Block 1995		46	0.32	44	0.00	51	0.05	53	0.05	64	0.04	72	0.04
Blumental 1952		69	0.26	76	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.04	82	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		3	0.44	1	0.33	1	0.32	2	0.66	16	0.55	4	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.26	74	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	71	0.05	62	0.04
Bunin 1987		50	0.31	38	0.00	57	0.06	51	0.06	60	0.05	61	0.05
Bunin 1987b		57	0.29	83	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	59	0.05	66	0.04
Chiu 1999		39	0.34	12	0.02	40	0.09	41	0.19	66	0.04	45	0.09
Cohen 1997		36	0.35	47	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.39	22	0.53	12	0.45
Cortot 1951		20	0.39	6	0.03	9	0.16	9	0.57	3	0.69	2	0.63
Csalog 1996		82	0.21	82	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.04	78	0.03
Czerny 1949		21	0.39	4	0.08	4	0.18	5	0.63	18	0.66	1	0.64
Czerny 1990		17	0.39	9	0.03	26	0.07	34	0.36	43	0.14	27	0.22
Duchoud 2007		37	0.35	24	0.00	41	0.08	40	0.19	27	0.31	25	0.24
Ezaki 2006		18	0.39	10	0.02	6	0.15	4	0.64	22	0.51	5	0.57
Falvay 1989		29	0.37	51	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.41	66	0.05	36	0.14
Farrell 1958		6	0.42	16	0.01	5	0.17	6	0.63	6	0.57	3	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.24	68	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	39	0.28	43	0.11
Fliere 1977		31	0.37	31	0.00	29	0.06	25	0.46	56	0.06	30	0.17
Fou 1978		26	0.38	39	0.00	24	0.08	19	0.52	47	0.06	29	0.18
Francois 1956		56	0.29	50	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.17	22	0.43	23	0.27
Friedman 1923		53	0.30	14	0.01	49	0.07	46	0.07	55	0.06	55	0.06
Friedman 1923b		51	0.30	22	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	46	0.07	52	0.06
Friedman 1930		68	0.26	40	0.00	66	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04	68	0.04
Garcia 2007		7	0.42	62	0.00	17	0.09	11	0.55	11	0.56	6	0.55
Garcia 2007b		74	0.25	53	0.00	70	0.04	67	0.04	59	0.05	74	0.04
Gierzod 1998		25	0.38	23	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.41	43	0.11	28	0.21
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.35	42	0.00	25	0.08	23	0.48	30	0.36	14	0.42
Groot 1988		79	0.23	85	0.00	69	0.05	52	0.05	82	0.03	73	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		2	0.46	5	0.07	3	0.20	1	0.70	30	0.33	11	0.48
Hatto 1993		62	0.27	46	0.00	64	0.03	70	0.03	71	0.04	85	0.03
Hatto 1997		65	0.26	81	0.00	65	0.05	60	0.05	78	0.04	69	0.04
Horowitz 1949		73	0.25	63	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Indjic 1988		71	0.26	67	0.00	67	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.04	67	0.04
Kapell 1951		4	0.43	11	0.02	16	0.07	20	0.50	54	0.06	31	0.17
Kissin 1993		40	0.34	69	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.05	58	0.05
Kushner 1989		12	0.40	26	0.00	18	0.08	13	0.55	42	0.10	26	0.23
Luisada 1991		58	0.29	57	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.04	75	0.03
Lushtak 2004		11	0.41	8	0.03	8	0.12	8	0.59	20	0.50	7	0.54
Malcuzynski 1961		27	0.37	35	0.00	33	0.09	33	0.38	62	0.05	37	0.14
Magaloff 1978		44	0.33	41	0.00	54	0.06	48	0.06	76	0.03	63	0.04
Magin 1975		84	0.20	89	0.00	84	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.03	87	0.02
Michalowski 1933		87	0.14	79	0.00	87	0.03	73	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		34	0.36	59	0.00	14	0.07	17	0.53	31	0.36	13	0.44
Mohovich 1999		24	0.38	13	0.01	13	0.07	18	0.53	38	0.25	20	0.36
Moravec 1969		30	0.37	27	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	50	0.06	50	0.06
Morozova 2008		22	0.38	20	0.01	15	0.07	14	0.54	36	0.26	18	0.37
Neighaus 1950		5	0.43	18	0.01	10	0.19	10	0.55	7	0.53	8	0.54
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.24	86	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	82	0.03	76	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.34	36	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	59	0.04	48	0.07
Osinska 1989		16	0.40	33	0.00	11	0.09	12	0.55	34	0.26	17	0.38
Pachmann 1927		48	0.32	54	0.00	53	0.05	57	0.05	37	0.17	46	0.09
Paderewski 1930		60	0.28	75	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	34	0.34	40	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.30	88	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	47	0.06	56	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		49	0.31	73	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	65	0.04
Poblocka 1999		23	0.38	49	0.00	35	0.12	32	0.39	57	0.05	35	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.37	28	0.00	20	0.10	16	0.54	21	0.51	10	0.52
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.23	90	0.00	81	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Richter 1976		28	0.37	58	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.23	61	0.05	42	0.11
Rosen 1989		13	0.40	17	0.01	19	0.09	15	0.54	37	0.17	22	0.30
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.26	21	0.01	86	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.20	29	0.00	77	0.02	80	0.02	43	0.15	59	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.22	87	0.00	76	0.02	81	0.02	41	0.17	54	0.06
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.26	65	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	44	0.12	49	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.20	77	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	55	0.05	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		86	0.19	78	0.00	73	0.02	79	0.02	38	0.20	51	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		38	0.35	55	0.00	23	0.08	27	0.45	26	0.29	19	0.36
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.32	48	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.17	57	0.05	47	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.47	2	0.11	2	0.20	3	0.66	22	0.43	9	0.53
Schilhawsky 1960		75	0.25	80	0.00	78	0.02	85	0.02	65	0.04	80	0.03
Shebanova 2002		9	0.42	7	0.03	12	0.08	26	0.45	62	0.06	32	0.16
Smith 1975		77	0.24	52	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.05	64	0.04
Sokolov 2002		63	0.27	34	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05
Sztompka 1959		19	0.39	15	0.01	34	0.09	35	0.34	47	0.07	34	0.15
Tomsic 1995		45	0.33	66	0.00	36	0.08	37	0.26	49	0.08	38	0.14
Uninsky 1932		33	0.37	37	0.00	39	0.10	39	0.23	69	0.04	44	0.10
Uninsky 1971		41	0.34	70	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.27	60	0.05	41	0.12
Wasowski 1980		14	0.40	25	0.00	27	0.09	24	0.47	67	0.05	33	0.15
Zak 1937		8	0.42	19	0.01	21	0.08	22	0.48	27	0.31	16	0.39
Zak 1951		15	0.40	43	0.00	28	0.10	28	0.43	26	0.27	21	0.34
Random 1		90	-0.08	72	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.03	71	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	41	0.12	60	0.05
Random 3		89	-0.06	56	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	71	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).