Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		74	0.30	66	0.00	79	0.04	79	0.04	86	0.03	82	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		51	0.38	45	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.21	36	0.29	40	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.54	4	0.08	9	0.16	16	0.61	7	0.67	14	0.64
Bacha 2000		78	0.29	69	0.00	74	0.04	81	0.04	57	0.05	75	0.04
Badura 1965		70	0.32	71	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	40	0.13	56	0.08
Barbosa 1983		28	0.45	67	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.48	33	0.26	30	0.35
Biret 1990		72	0.30	72	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.04
Blet 2003		41	0.39	48	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	40	0.20	53	0.10
Block 1995		21	0.48	59	0.00	22	0.11	20	0.56	10	0.59	18	0.57
Blumental 1952		65	0.34	85	0.00	63	0.06	50	0.06	46	0.07	63	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.50	31	0.00	12	0.14	9	0.70	11	0.63	12	0.66
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.30	68	0.00	72	0.06	53	0.06	61	0.06	60	0.06
Bunin 1987		67	0.33	73	0.00	46	0.08	46	0.08	34	0.22	46	0.13
Bunin 1987b		69	0.32	74	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.20	31	0.32	39	0.25
Chiu 1999		16	0.50	33	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.48	11	0.52	22	0.50
Cohen 1997		80	0.26	47	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		76	0.29	58	0.00	61	0.05	65	0.05	45	0.09	59	0.07
Csalog 1996		30	0.44	52	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.30	17	0.42	31	0.35
Czerny 1949		77	0.29	28	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	48	0.07	71	0.05
Czerny 1990		4	0.57	1	0.37	1	0.36	2	0.82	3	0.83	1	0.82
Duchoud 2007		49	0.38	42	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	12	0.51	44	0.17
Ezaki 2006		56	0.37	70	0.00	53	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.05	74	0.04
Falvay 1989		55	0.37	56	0.00	55	0.04	77	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.04
Farrell 1958		63	0.34	49	0.00	54	0.04	75	0.04	45	0.09	61	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.10	81	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		1	0.61	3	0.09	3	0.31	1	0.82	4	0.74	3	0.78
Fou 1978		18	0.49	35	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.59	15	0.54	20	0.56
Francois 1956		83	0.21	64	0.00	84	0.04	80	0.04	87	0.02	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		34	0.41	11	0.01	30	0.11	37	0.24	20	0.49	33	0.34
Friedman 1923b		35	0.41	21	0.00	29	0.08	32	0.30	16	0.56	27	0.41
Friedman 1930		31	0.43	10	0.01	28	0.10	30	0.35	18	0.52	24	0.43
Garcia 2007		50	0.38	57	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.34	12	0.55	25	0.43
Garcia 2007b		62	0.34	22	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.20	25	0.39	38	0.28
Gierzod 1998		43	0.39	77	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.27	65	0.05	48	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.36	83	0.00	64	0.05	66	0.05	66	0.04	79	0.04
Groot 1988		25	0.46	36	0.00	20	0.13	24	0.50	18	0.42	23	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.51	17	0.00	15	0.11	21	0.55	32	0.32	26	0.42
Hatto 1993		27	0.45	60	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.50	32	0.25	32	0.35
Hatto 1997		68	0.32	75	0.00	71	0.06	57	0.06	81	0.04	70	0.05
Horowitz 1949		54	0.37	50	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	28	0.37	45	0.14
Indjic 1988		33	0.42	88	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.38	37	0.22	36	0.29
Kapell 1951		9	0.53	7	0.01	6	0.19	5	0.76	2	0.65	7	0.70
Kissin 1993		5	0.55	13	0.01	5	0.26	4	0.78	4	0.83	2	0.80
Kushner 1989		3	0.58	6	0.02	4	0.26	3	0.80	3	0.73	4	0.76
Luisada 1991		37	0.41	43	0.00	58	0.08	45	0.08	48	0.07	57	0.07
Lushtak 2004		42	0.39	20	0.00	45	0.06	54	0.06	30	0.25	49	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.49	8	0.01	11	0.15	15	0.63	13	0.53	17	0.58
Magaloff 1978		13	0.51	44	0.00	13	0.15	11	0.66	4	0.66	10	0.66
Magin 1975		8	0.53	5	0.04	7	0.18	10	0.68	7	0.66	9	0.67
Michalowski 1933		60	0.35	12	0.01	43	0.07	43	0.15	7	0.57	35	0.29
Milkina 1970		75	0.29	38	0.00	66	0.05	68	0.05	69	0.04	78	0.04
Mohovich 1999		44	0.39	55	0.00	57	0.06	56	0.06	80	0.04	73	0.05
Moravec 1969		38	0.40	80	0.00	42	0.09	42	0.18	39	0.18	42	0.18
Morozova 2008		12	0.51	26	0.00	8	0.19	7	0.75	2	0.65	8	0.70
Neighaus 1950		39	0.40	32	0.00	51	0.05	69	0.05	42	0.17	55	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		24	0.46	16	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.50	2	0.63	19	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.50	24	0.00	18	0.17	19	0.56	8	0.53	21	0.54
Osinska 1989		36	0.41	51	0.00	52	0.05	70	0.05	62	0.05	65	0.05
Pachmann 1927		15	0.50	27	0.00	19	0.13	14	0.64	1	0.81	6	0.72
Paderewski 1930		45	0.39	54	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.22	10	0.60	29	0.36
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.36	79	0.00	70	0.05	67	0.05	58	0.05	64	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		32	0.42	53	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.13	19	0.45	41	0.24
Poblocka 1999		23	0.47	15	0.00	17	0.15	17	0.59	12	0.59	16	0.59
Rabcewiczowa 1932		81	0.25	37	0.00	80	0.04	76	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.38	76	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	41	0.17	52	0.10
Rangell 2001		53	0.37	25	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	38	0.23	51	0.11
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		22	0.48	34	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.43	19	0.38	28	0.40
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.31	62	0.00	78	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.05	72	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.18	78	0.00	82	0.04	82	0.04	76	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.15	89	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		82	0.25	63	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.11	90	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.02	90	0.02
Rossi 2007		79	0.28	87	0.00	77	0.04	78	0.04	29	0.31	50	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.36	61	0.00	56	0.06	55	0.06	54	0.05	68	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.44	23	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.28	37	0.28	37	0.28
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.45	40	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.40	57	0.07	43	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.35	14	0.01	33	0.07	36	0.25	24	0.35	34	0.30
Shebanova 2002		7	0.54	18	0.00	14	0.17	8	0.71	10	0.60	13	0.65
Smith 1975		66	0.33	41	0.00	76	0.06	52	0.06	72	0.04	67	0.05
Sokolov 2002		64	0.34	46	0.00	68	0.05	71	0.05	48	0.06	66	0.05
Sztompka 1959		2	0.59	2	0.27	2	0.29	6	0.75	4	0.78	5	0.76
Tomsic 1995		40	0.40	19	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	32	0.22	47	0.12
Uninsky 1932		10	0.51	9	0.01	10	0.15	13	0.64	7	0.68	11	0.66
Uninsky 1971		48	0.38	84	0.00	50	0.05	64	0.05	46	0.07	62	0.06
Wasowski 1980		19	0.49	29	0.00	16	0.14	12	0.65	9	0.59	15	0.62
Zak 1937		47	0.38	65	0.00	65	0.06	58	0.06	60	0.05	69	0.05
Zak 1951		52	0.37	82	0.00	69	0.07	47	0.07	45	0.08	58	0.07
Random 1		90	-0.03	39	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	41	0.10	83	0.03
Random 2		89	-0.02	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	30	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	10	0.42	54	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).