Bunin 1987

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		72	0.26	28	0.00	81	0.04	66	0.04	58	0.05	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		76	0.25	29	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.42	15	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.49	29	0.33	11	0.40
Bacha 2000		78	0.24	49	0.00	72	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.04	76	0.03
Badura 1965		66	0.27	12	0.00	37	0.06	44	0.10	53	0.04	50	0.06
Barbosa 1983		10	0.41	50	0.00	9	0.09	12	0.53	31	0.29	13	0.39
Biret 1990		40	0.33	51	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.23	43	0.14	28	0.18
Blet 2003		20	0.37	30	0.00	10	0.11	14	0.52	16	0.49	9	0.50
Block 1995		65	0.28	7	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	70	0.04	57	0.05
Blumental 1952		47	0.31	52	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.13	53	0.06	46	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		25	0.36	8	0.00	28	0.10	25	0.36	59	0.05	35	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.26	13	0.00	76	0.03	87	0.03	77	0.04	77	0.03
Bunin 1987		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Bunin 1987b		1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Chiu 1999		28	0.35	16	0.00	34	0.07	29	0.30	39	0.14	27	0.20
Cohen 1997		81	0.23	5	0.00	82	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.03	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.16	53	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		34	0.34	54	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	31	0.19	29	0.16
Czerny 1949		57	0.29	55	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	65	0.05	68	0.04
Czerny 1990		17	0.39	56	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.48	39	0.18	22	0.29
Duchoud 2007		51	0.30	31	0.00	21	0.10	26	0.35	17	0.43	14	0.39
Ezaki 2006		38	0.33	57	0.00	31	0.07	35	0.20	65	0.05	42	0.10
Falvay 1989		16	0.39	32	0.00	13	0.10	23	0.40	58	0.05	32	0.14
Farrell 1958		36	0.33	20	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.20	44	0.11	30	0.15
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.22	17	0.00	84	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04
Fliere 1977		6	0.44	58	0.00	2	0.17	10	0.53	39	0.24	15	0.36
Fou 1978		71	0.26	21	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03
Francois 1956		75	0.25	59	0.00	65	0.03	83	0.03	46	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1923		55	0.30	60	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	31	0.30	36	0.13
Friedman 1923b		52	0.30	61	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	36	0.29	41	0.12
Friedman 1930		33	0.34	33	0.00	18	0.11	13	0.52	22	0.50	7	0.51
Garcia 2007		48	0.31	62	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	37	0.16	44	0.10
Garcia 2007b		12	0.40	63	0.00	11	0.12	6	0.60	11	0.65	2	0.62
Gierzod 1998		70	0.26	64	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	77	0.04	82	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.33	2	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	58	0.05	58	0.05
Groot 1988		11	0.41	6	0.00	5	0.15	20	0.42	32	0.27	17	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.29	65	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Hatto 1993		21	0.37	22	0.00	17	0.16	11	0.53	40	0.17	21	0.30
Hatto 1997		27	0.36	34	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.50	35	0.22	18	0.33
Horowitz 1949		3	0.45	9	0.00	12	0.12	15	0.51	5	0.67	4	0.58
Indjic 1988		19	0.38	23	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.55	34	0.28	12	0.39
Kapell 1951		8	0.43	66	0.00	15	0.10	9	0.55	37	0.18	19	0.31
Kissin 1993		74	0.26	35	0.00	74	0.03	72	0.03	56	0.06	64	0.04
Kushner 1989		14	0.40	24	0.00	25	0.10	19	0.47	43	0.10	26	0.22
Luisada 1991		4	0.44	10	0.00	8	0.11	5	0.60	18	0.47	6	0.53
Lushtak 2004		30	0.35	18	0.00	27	0.10	21	0.42	32	0.21	20	0.30
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.46	67	0.00	3	0.13	2	0.69	22	0.47	5	0.57
Magaloff 1978		37	0.33	68	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.14	51	0.05	48	0.08
Magin 1975		31	0.35	69	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.19	43	0.11	33	0.14
Michalowski 1933		80	0.23	70	0.00	71	0.03	71	0.03	63	0.06	63	0.04
Milkina 1970		56	0.29	36	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	64	0.04	61	0.04
Mohovich 1999		64	0.28	71	0.00	64	0.05	59	0.05	64	0.04	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		18	0.38	72	0.00	30	0.09	31	0.29	62	0.05	37	0.12
Morozova 2008		15	0.39	73	0.00	14	0.10	7	0.56	30	0.36	10	0.45
Neighaus 1950		61	0.28	37	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		54	0.30	38	0.00	52	0.08	45	0.08	40	0.18	39	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.33	39	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	77	0.03	62	0.04
Osinska 1989		45	0.32	40	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.14	64	0.05	47	0.08
Pachmann 1927		46	0.31	74	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	33	0.24	40	0.12
Paderewski 1930		79	0.24	75	0.00	67	0.03	78	0.03	47	0.07	54	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.32	76	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	55	0.06	51	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		69	0.26	77	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	47	0.05	60	0.04
Poblocka 1999		24	0.36	25	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.24	53	0.06	38	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.31	78	0.00	54	0.07	46	0.07	47	0.07	49	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		5	0.44	41	0.00	4	0.16	4	0.61	9	0.57	3	0.59
Rangell 2001		50	0.31	79	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	51	0.06	59	0.05
Richter 1976		39	0.33	42	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.22	46	0.08	34	0.13
Rosen 1989		53	0.30	26	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.16	53	0.05	45	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.27	43	0.00	80	0.04	67	0.04	53	0.06	56	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		85	0.18	44	0.00	85	0.03	74	0.03	61	0.04	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.21	80	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.27	81	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.05	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.24	82	0.00	79	0.03	73	0.03	46	0.06	72	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.19	83	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	65	0.04	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.33	14	0.00	53	0.07	47	0.07	61	0.04	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.28	4	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		63	0.28	84	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	80	0.03	66	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.35	45	0.00	29	0.11	27	0.33	20	0.37	16	0.35
Shebanova 2002		7	0.43	3	0.00	6	0.14	3	0.65	27	0.40	8	0.51
Smith 1975		87	0.14	85	0.00	87	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Sokolov 2002		60	0.29	86	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05
Sztompka 1959		26	0.36	87	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	60	0.05	55	0.05
Tomsic 1995		41	0.33	27	0.00	22	0.10	30	0.29	39	0.19	25	0.23
Uninsky 1932		32	0.35	88	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.16	47	0.06	43	0.10
Uninsky 1971		58	0.29	46	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	78	0.03	65	0.04
Wasowski 1980		13	0.40	19	0.00	26	0.11	22	0.41	76	0.05	31	0.14
Zak 1937		23	0.37	47	0.00	24	0.10	28	0.33	38	0.17	24	0.24
Zak 1951		22	0.37	11	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.37	32	0.20	23	0.27
Random 1		89	-0.03	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	79	0.02	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.03	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.07	69	0.04
Random 3		90	-0.08	48	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).