Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.38	4	0.00	48	0.07	53	0.07	14	0.51	47	0.19
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.42	46	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.17	19	0.52	35	0.30
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.51	5	0.00	12	0.12	8	0.62	5	0.69	8	0.65
Bacha 2000		38	0.41	10	0.00	41	0.07	34	0.20	9	0.59	32	0.34
Badura 1965		68	0.34	61	0.00	67	0.04	72	0.04	47	0.05	83	0.04
Barbosa 1983		15	0.49	12	0.00	14	0.12	11	0.61	6	0.67	10	0.64
Biret 1990		52	0.37	31	0.00	63	0.05	61	0.05	41	0.20	64	0.10
Blet 2003		30	0.43	47	0.00	20	0.09	26	0.35	10	0.53	25	0.43
Block 1995		58	0.37	32	0.00	47	0.07	56	0.07	40	0.16	59	0.11
Blumental 1952		7	0.52	22	0.00	8	0.13	6	0.71	1	0.79	3	0.75
Boshniakovich 1969		50	0.38	48	0.00	44	0.09	39	0.17	45	0.09	57	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.28	33	0.00	86	0.05	64	0.05	49	0.07	73	0.06
Bunin 1987		51	0.37	23	0.00	31	0.07	40	0.17	11	0.53	36	0.30
Bunin 1987b		53	0.37	34	0.00	33	0.06	43	0.14	13	0.50	39	0.26
Chiu 1999		18	0.47	77	0.00	27	0.11	21	0.41	8	0.55	20	0.47
Cohen 1997		78	0.28	78	0.00	77	0.04	74	0.04	45	0.09	76	0.06
Cortot 1951		84	0.26	62	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	50	0.07	79	0.05
Csalog 1996		65	0.35	16	0.00	69	0.05	65	0.05	46	0.08	75	0.06
Czerny 1949		71	0.31	49	0.00	74	0.04	76	0.04	40	0.22	66	0.09
Czerny 1990		5	0.53	63	0.00	4	0.20	4	0.74	7	0.77	4	0.75
Duchoud 2007		56	0.37	50	0.00	56	0.07	52	0.07	20	0.40	50	0.17
Ezaki 2006		55	0.37	3	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	60	0.05	81	0.04
Falvay 1989		20	0.47	35	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.31	19	0.40	29	0.35
Farrell 1958		74	0.29	64	0.00	76	0.04	78	0.04	54	0.06	78	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		81	0.27	13	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	41	0.23	70	0.08
Fliere 1977		11	0.50	11	0.00	17	0.14	13	0.57	22	0.47	17	0.52
Fou 1978		28	0.43	65	0.00	39	0.06	44	0.12	33	0.30	46	0.19
Francois 1956		80	0.27	27	0.00	78	0.05	62	0.05	44	0.10	72	0.07
Friedman 1923		61	0.36	79	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	26	0.41	56	0.13
Friedman 1923b		63	0.35	36	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	28	0.40	55	0.14
Friedman 1930		29	0.43	15	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.27	15	0.56	28	0.39
Garcia 2007		69	0.34	37	0.00	52	0.07	49	0.07	17	0.42	51	0.17
Garcia 2007b		27	0.43	80	0.00	11	0.11	16	0.54	4	0.74	11	0.63
Gierzod 1998		33	0.42	66	0.00	34	0.06	29	0.28	19	0.44	31	0.35
Gornostaeva 1994		72	0.31	38	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	57	0.05	85	0.04
Groot 1988		4	0.53	67	0.00	5	0.28	5	0.74	2	0.76	5	0.75
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.53	28	0.00	9	0.14	10	0.61	10	0.58	13	0.59
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.88	2	0.00	2	0.94	2	0.98	2	0.98	2	0.98
Horowitz 1949		64	0.35	51	0.00	55	0.06	58	0.06	15	0.55	49	0.18
Indjic 1988		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Kapell 1951		14	0.49	17	0.00	15	0.13	12	0.59	8	0.53	14	0.56
Kissin 1993		19	0.47	68	0.00	22	0.08	17	0.49	17	0.61	15	0.55
Kushner 1989		17	0.48	39	0.00	19	0.11	20	0.44	24	0.38	27	0.41
Luisada 1991		10	0.50	8	0.00	6	0.20	9	0.62	6	0.67	9	0.64
Lushtak 2004		66	0.35	29	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	66	0.04	84	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.44	6	0.00	18	0.10	19	0.46	14	0.52	19	0.49
Magaloff 1978		44	0.40	40	0.00	42	0.07	35	0.18	28	0.28	41	0.22
Magin 1975		9	0.51	69	0.00	10	0.11	7	0.66	2	0.75	7	0.70
Michalowski 1933		76	0.29	70	0.00	75	0.04	67	0.04	31	0.27	60	0.10
Milkina 1970		13	0.49	71	0.00	13	0.13	15	0.54	12	0.66	12	0.60
Mohovich 1999		39	0.41	72	0.00	16	0.12	24	0.40	23	0.48	24	0.44
Moravec 1969		25	0.44	20	0.00	38	0.05	42	0.15	15	0.44	38	0.26
Morozova 2008		42	0.40	52	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.16	33	0.30	43	0.22
Neighaus 1950		46	0.39	81	0.00	35	0.05	36	0.18	24	0.37	40	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		43	0.40	14	0.00	26	0.10	31	0.27	3	0.61	26	0.41
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.46	53	0.00	24	0.09	28	0.31	20	0.36	33	0.33
Osinska 1989		36	0.41	82	0.00	53	0.07	50	0.07	40	0.17	58	0.11
Pachmann 1927		82	0.27	30	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	54	0.06	82	0.04
Paderewski 1930		67	0.34	41	0.00	49	0.07	54	0.07	4	0.66	45	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		73	0.31	83	0.00	65	0.04	79	0.04	37	0.18	68	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		54	0.37	21	0.00	50	0.08	47	0.08	6	0.58	42	0.22
Poblocka 1999		47	0.39	54	0.00	51	0.09	45	0.09	32	0.30	52	0.16
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.29	84	0.00	72	0.04	77	0.04	52	0.06	77	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		57	0.37	73	0.00	57	0.08	48	0.08	33	0.26	54	0.14
Rangell 2001		79	0.27	42	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	70	0.03	87	0.03
Richter 1976		22	0.45	24	0.00	29	0.08	32	0.25	22	0.50	30	0.35
Rosen 1989		34	0.42	74	0.00	46	0.07	57	0.07	40	0.15	63	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		59	0.37	25	0.00	58	0.05	63	0.05	28	0.43	53	0.15
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.27	85	0.00	80	0.04	73	0.04	39	0.23	61	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.25	75	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	44	0.11	80	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.34	43	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	30	0.25	65	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.23	86	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	49	0.06	86	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.08	87	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	80	0.02	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.42	7	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.20	15	0.47	34	0.31
Rubinstein 1952		26	0.43	88	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.40	15	0.55	22	0.47
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.50	44	0.00	7	0.16	14	0.54	15	0.55	16	0.54
Schilhawsky 1960		62	0.35	89	0.00	66	0.04	75	0.04	31	0.25	62	0.10
Shebanova 2002		3	0.55	19	0.00	3	0.45	3	0.75	5	0.70	6	0.72
Smith 1975		60	0.36	55	0.00	70	0.04	80	0.04	41	0.13	71	0.07
Sokolov 2002		31	0.42	56	0.00	54	0.07	51	0.07	16	0.48	48	0.18
Sztompka 1959		40	0.41	45	0.00	23	0.11	25	0.38	16	0.56	23	0.46
Tomsic 1995		37	0.41	57	0.00	45	0.09	46	0.09	11	0.48	44	0.21
Uninsky 1932		48	0.38	26	0.00	43	0.07	37	0.17	19	0.46	37	0.28
Uninsky 1971		24	0.44	58	0.00	25	0.09	22	0.40	10	0.55	21	0.47
Wasowski 1980		16	0.48	59	0.00	21	0.13	18	0.48	19	0.50	18	0.49
Zak 1937		41	0.40	9	0.00	62	0.05	60	0.05	43	0.12	69	0.08
Zak 1951		45	0.40	18	0.00	64	0.07	55	0.07	51	0.06	74	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.03	76	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	64	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.06	90	0.00	88	0.03	86	0.03	27	0.25	67	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.08	60	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	58	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).