Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.47	10	0.02	15	0.07	20	0.53	5	0.63	15	0.58
Anderszewski 2003		35	0.40	25	0.00	22	0.08	32	0.41	28	0.41	30	0.41
Ashkenazy 1981		69	0.31	55	0.00	77	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.04	81	0.04
Bacha 2000		23	0.44	52	0.00	30	0.10	26	0.46	6	0.65	17	0.55
Badura 1965		44	0.38	35	0.00	45	0.09	46	0.09	16	0.45	44	0.20
Barbosa 1983		14	0.47	40	0.00	25	0.09	16	0.56	28	0.34	28	0.44
Biret 1990		39	0.39	16	0.01	27	0.10	41	0.25	28	0.39	36	0.31
Blet 2003		72	0.29	79	0.00	74	0.05	69	0.05	57	0.04	77	0.04
Block 1995		33	0.41	38	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.40	29	0.32	35	0.36
Blumental 1952		25	0.44	24	0.00	29	0.09	23	0.51	25	0.44	27	0.47
Boshniakovich 1969		62	0.33	61	0.00	50	0.06	57	0.06	65	0.05	71	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.49	3	0.07	9	0.13	10	0.60	6	0.72	7	0.66
Bunin 1987		64	0.33	77	0.00	62	0.05	65	0.05	35	0.20	51	0.10
Bunin 1987b		61	0.34	65	0.00	58	0.04	76	0.04	33	0.27	49	0.10
Chiu 1999		65	0.33	53	0.00	57	0.04	75	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.04
Cohen 1997		21	0.44	39	0.00	28	0.08	19	0.54	4	0.71	10	0.62
Cortot 1951		42	0.38	41	0.00	48	0.08	51	0.08	11	0.61	43	0.22
Csalog 1996		75	0.27	88	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Czerny 1949		1	0.52	1	0.40	1	0.40	1	0.76	5	0.80	1	0.78
Czerny 1990		54	0.35	45	0.00	47	0.07	52	0.07	53	0.06	59	0.06
Duchoud 2007		82	0.20	76	0.00	80	0.04	78	0.04	75	0.04	80	0.04
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		8	0.48	14	0.01	16	0.07	9	0.61	12	0.44	21	0.52
Farrell 1958		38	0.39	19	0.01	44	0.12	42	0.24	24	0.35	39	0.29
Ferenczy 1958		20	0.45	26	0.00	31	0.11	27	0.45	4	0.77	14	0.59
Fliere 1977		27	0.43	59	0.00	33	0.07	29	0.42	53	0.06	47	0.16
Fou 1978		11	0.47	33	0.00	18	0.08	17	0.56	20	0.48	22	0.52
Francois 1956		55	0.35	51	0.00	41	0.09	44	0.17	18	0.54	38	0.30
Friedman 1923		81	0.20	89	0.00	83	0.04	71	0.04	88	0.02	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		83	0.20	87	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1930		76	0.24	85	0.00	75	0.04	80	0.04	67	0.04	79	0.04
Garcia 2007		79	0.22	70	0.00	73	0.05	68	0.05	55	0.05	70	0.05
Garcia 2007b		77	0.23	60	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	52	0.05	83	0.04
Gierzod 1998		4	0.51	8	0.03	3	0.19	5	0.68	3	0.70	5	0.69
Gornostaeva 1994		10	0.47	32	0.00	14	0.10	11	0.60	8	0.64	11	0.62
Groot 1988		53	0.36	36	0.00	49	0.09	47	0.09	76	0.04	60	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		13	0.47	49	0.00	19	0.08	14	0.58	36	0.23	33	0.37
Hatto 1993		47	0.37	46	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	68	0.04	82	0.04
Hatto 1997		26	0.43	29	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.33	34	0.23	40	0.28
Horowitz 1949		85	0.14	68	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.04	85	0.03
Indjic 1988		57	0.34	62	0.00	63	0.05	63	0.05	57	0.06	68	0.05
Kapell 1951		67	0.32	43	0.00	51	0.07	55	0.07	66	0.05	56	0.06
Kissin 1993		56	0.35	31	0.00	60	0.04	72	0.04	55	0.07	67	0.05
Kushner 1989		34	0.41	47	0.00	43	0.09	43	0.23	40	0.14	46	0.18
Luisada 1991		52	0.36	58	0.00	64	0.07	56	0.07	64	0.06	55	0.06
Lushtak 2004		32	0.41	66	0.00	38	0.10	34	0.40	26	0.32	34	0.36
Malcuzynski 1961		9	0.48	12	0.01	4	0.16	3	0.70	8	0.61	9	0.65
Magaloff 1978		29	0.42	34	0.00	40	0.12	38	0.34	31	0.27	37	0.30
Magin 1975		70	0.31	56	0.00	69	0.06	58	0.06	80	0.04	64	0.05
Michalowski 1933		86	0.12	80	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.03	89	0.02
Milkina 1970		30	0.42	27	0.00	21	0.08	28	0.42	28	0.43	29	0.42
Mohovich 1999		5	0.49	9	0.02	5	0.13	6	0.68	6	0.69	6	0.68
Moravec 1969		24	0.44	18	0.01	17	0.08	24	0.50	9	0.50	23	0.50
Morozova 2008		22	0.44	22	0.00	20	0.08	15	0.57	16	0.50	19	0.53
Neighaus 1950		59	0.34	83	0.00	65	0.07	54	0.07	46	0.06	61	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		84	0.18	73	0.00	84	0.04	81	0.04	67	0.04	74	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.39	42	0.00	37	0.09	36	0.37	41	0.14	41	0.23
Osinska 1989		18	0.46	7	0.03	7	0.12	21	0.52	24	0.46	25	0.49
Pachmann 1927		73	0.28	78	0.00	70	0.05	66	0.05	56	0.06	66	0.05
Paderewski 1930		87	0.09	69	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	88	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		74	0.28	37	0.00	71	0.06	59	0.06	66	0.05	63	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		80	0.22	54	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	80	0.03	84	0.03
Poblocka 1999		19	0.45	13	0.01	24	0.08	30	0.42	30	0.35	32	0.38
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.46	11	0.01	10	0.12	8	0.65	8	0.65	8	0.65
Rachmaninoff 1923		58	0.34	64	0.00	66	0.08	49	0.08	44	0.11	52	0.09
Rangell 2001		41	0.39	4	0.05	12	0.12	22	0.51	4	0.64	16	0.57
Richter 1976		48	0.37	71	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	73	0.04	75	0.04
Rosen 1989		17	0.46	20	0.00	13	0.11	12	0.58	14	0.43	24	0.50
Rosenthal 1930		36	0.40	50	0.00	35	0.07	31	0.41	10	0.69	20	0.53
Rosenthal 1931		31	0.42	5	0.03	11	0.12	25	0.49	8	0.75	13	0.61
Rosenthal 1931b		45	0.37	21	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.40	9	0.72	18	0.54
Rosenthal 1931c		28	0.42	17	0.01	26	0.10	18	0.55	5	0.71	12	0.62
Rosenthal 1931d		50	0.36	23	0.00	39	0.13	37	0.35	9	0.69	26	0.49
Rossi 2007		78	0.22	86	0.00	81	0.04	79	0.04	60	0.05	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.37	81	0.00	52	0.10	45	0.10	33	0.17	48	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.40	30	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.27	43	0.20	42	0.23
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.46	48	0.00	23	0.07	13	0.58	27	0.28	31	0.40
Schilhawsky 1960		68	0.32	84	0.00	72	0.04	70	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.04
Shebanova 2002		60	0.34	63	0.00	67	0.08	50	0.08	67	0.06	54	0.07
Smith 1975		2	0.52	6	0.03	8	0.12	4	0.69	3	0.76	2	0.72
Sokolov 2002		49	0.36	28	0.00	46	0.08	48	0.08	23	0.42	45	0.18
Sztompka 1959		66	0.32	57	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	78	0.04	76	0.04
Tomsic 1995		6	0.49	2	0.15	2	0.25	7	0.67	1	0.73	3	0.70
Uninsky 1932		63	0.33	72	0.00	59	0.04	77	0.04	45	0.06	69	0.05
Uninsky 1971		3	0.51	15	0.01	6	0.15	2	0.72	4	0.66	4	0.69
Wasowski 1980		71	0.30	82	0.00	68	0.05	64	0.05	65	0.05	62	0.05
Zak 1937		51	0.36	67	0.00	56	0.05	67	0.05	59	0.05	65	0.05
Zak 1951		43	0.38	44	0.00	53	0.07	53	0.07	49	0.06	57	0.06
Random 1		89	0.00	74	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	20	0.37	53	0.09
Random 2		88	0.08	75	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	6	0.46	50	0.10
Random 3		90	-0.04	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	15	0.36	58	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).