Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.42	7	0.04	9	0.14	16	0.46	6	0.62	15	0.53
Anderszewski 2003		79	0.29	52	0.00	70	0.05	58	0.05	50	0.07	73	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.49	35	0.00	15	0.13	12	0.50	11	0.64	8	0.57
Bacha 2000		73	0.31	74	0.00	78	0.05	57	0.05	41	0.15	64	0.09
Badura 1965		71	0.32	49	0.00	73	0.03	87	0.03	42	0.11	75	0.06
Barbosa 1983		31	0.41	42	0.00	23	0.07	21	0.39	19	0.42	27	0.40
Biret 1990		46	0.39	58	0.00	59	0.07	45	0.07	30	0.37	45	0.16
Blet 2003		15	0.45	12	0.01	13	0.11	15	0.47	3	0.67	10	0.56
Block 1995		41	0.40	25	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.21	25	0.42	36	0.30
Blumental 1952		23	0.43	53	0.00	27	0.09	29	0.34	16	0.54	23	0.43
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.40	45	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	50	0.06	76	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.35	37	0.00	64	0.04	74	0.04	31	0.29	58	0.11
Bunin 1987		34	0.41	24	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.27	20	0.42	33	0.34
Bunin 1987b		33	0.41	27	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.28	16	0.47	31	0.36
Chiu 1999		38	0.41	18	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.36	10	0.54	22	0.44
Cohen 1997		59	0.35	34	0.00	40	0.05	44	0.10	21	0.54	40	0.23
Cortot 1951		85	0.23	76	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.05	86	0.04
Csalog 1996		28	0.42	61	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	22	0.32	60	0.11
Czerny 1949		82	0.24	72	0.00	85	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.04
Czerny 1990		10	0.47	3	0.11	5	0.21	9	0.54	24	0.56	14	0.55
Duchoud 2007		56	0.36	62	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	18	0.43	53	0.13
Ezaki 2006		55	0.36	47	0.00	63	0.04	76	0.04	47	0.09	71	0.06
Falvay 1989		22	0.43	26	0.00	22	0.06	20	0.41	22	0.36	30	0.38
Farrell 1958		77	0.30	68	0.00	79	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.08	72	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		86	0.19	83	0.00	86	0.04	73	0.04	48	0.08	74	0.06
Fliere 1977		1	0.58	1	0.34	1	0.34	1	0.80	5	0.73	1	0.76
Fou 1978		36	0.41	56	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.15	37	0.26	41	0.20
Francois 1956		63	0.33	48	0.00	74	0.03	85	0.03	23	0.42	61	0.11
Friedman 1923		61	0.34	40	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	30	0.33	62	0.11
Friedman 1923b		62	0.34	29	0.00	66	0.05	51	0.05	32	0.35	54	0.13
Friedman 1930		29	0.41	59	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.27	13	0.57	28	0.39
Garcia 2007		76	0.30	69	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	35	0.17	68	0.08
Garcia 2007b		19	0.44	43	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.37	16	0.55	20	0.45
Gierzod 1998		75	0.30	71	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.11	40	0.15	52	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.35	66	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.19	31	0.36	37	0.26
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Harasiewicz 1955		42	0.40	75	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	67	0.05	70	0.07
Hatto 1993		3	0.53	2	0.13	2	0.33	2	0.76	5	0.74	2	0.75
Hatto 1997		11	0.47	44	0.00	10	0.11	8	0.56	9	0.57	11	0.56
Horowitz 1949		20	0.44	20	0.00	43	0.06	40	0.15	6	0.67	35	0.32
Indjic 1988		4	0.52	8	0.02	3	0.27	3	0.73	3	0.75	3	0.74
Kapell 1951		48	0.39	33	0.00	54	0.03	83	0.03	57	0.06	81	0.04
Kissin 1993		51	0.38	77	0.00	50	0.04	75	0.04	36	0.39	56	0.12
Kushner 1989		16	0.45	64	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.38	29	0.30	32	0.34
Luisada 1991		5	0.50	5	0.05	7	0.18	5	0.59	8	0.65	4	0.62
Lushtak 2004		74	0.30	36	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	36	0.13	69	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.41	39	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.11	43	0.12	59	0.11
Magaloff 1978		17	0.45	17	0.01	17	0.13	19	0.41	14	0.49	19	0.45
Magin 1975		2	0.54	4	0.07	4	0.19	6	0.59	6	0.66	5	0.62
Michalowski 1933		60	0.35	19	0.00	71	0.04	77	0.04	17	0.42	51	0.13
Milkina 1970		49	0.39	31	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.25	30	0.40	34	0.32
Mohovich 1999		21	0.43	28	0.00	20	0.08	17	0.44	16	0.56	16	0.50
Moravec 1969		32	0.41	46	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.17	21	0.36	38	0.25
Morozova 2008		35	0.41	10	0.02	16	0.14	14	0.47	23	0.47	17	0.47
Neighaus 1950		52	0.37	73	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	26	0.36	55	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.39	22	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	13	0.48	42	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.36	55	0.00	60	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05	80	0.05
Osinska 1989		54	0.36	54	0.00	57	0.06	47	0.06	57	0.05	77	0.05
Pachmann 1927		80	0.28	84	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	45	0.08	79	0.05
Paderewski 1930		64	0.33	51	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	22	0.47	48	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.39	65	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	19	0.45	50	0.13
Pierdomenico 2008		70	0.32	63	0.00	72	0.04	78	0.04	34	0.19	65	0.09
Poblocka 1999		18	0.45	41	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.38	21	0.50	21	0.44
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.32	50	0.00	53	0.04	69	0.04	38	0.23	63	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		9	0.48	13	0.01	8	0.18	13	0.49	3	0.70	6	0.59
Rangell 2001		84	0.23	87	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	52	0.05	85	0.04
Richter 1976		13	0.46	21	0.00	18	0.09	18	0.42	24	0.50	18	0.46
Rosen 1989		44	0.39	15	0.01	28	0.09	25	0.37	15	0.42	29	0.39
Rosenthal 1930		30	0.41	32	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.25	11	0.68	26	0.41
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.23	57	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	23	0.48	57	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.26	85	0.00	81	0.06	49	0.06	23	0.49	43	0.17
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.32	78	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	19	0.48	49	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.29	79	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	13	0.54	47	0.15
Rossi 2007		87	0.16	88	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	62	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.33	60	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	32	0.18	67	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		12	0.46	6	0.04	14	0.11	11	0.54	10	0.60	9	0.57
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.42	30	0.00	29	0.09	30	0.34	36	0.17	39	0.24
Schilhawsky 1960		68	0.33	67	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	47	0.06	83	0.04
Shebanova 2002		6	0.49	23	0.00	6	0.17	4	0.60	15	0.53	12	0.56
Smith 1975		40	0.40	70	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	22	0.47	46	0.15
Sokolov 2002		39	0.40	38	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	15	0.49	44	0.16
Sztompka 1959		24	0.42	9	0.02	30	0.09	27	0.36	21	0.47	25	0.41
Tomsic 1995		26	0.42	16	0.01	19	0.08	28	0.36	10	0.49	24	0.42
Uninsky 1932		45	0.39	81	0.00	58	0.05	52	0.05	35	0.18	66	0.09
Uninsky 1971		14	0.46	14	0.01	11	0.13	7	0.56	7	0.61	7	0.58
Wasowski 1980		8	0.48	11	0.02	12	0.12	10	0.54	10	0.56	13	0.55
Zak 1937		67	0.33	86	0.00	77	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.06	78	0.05
Zak 1951		65	0.33	90	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	52	0.05	82	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.06	82	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	55	0.04	88	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.03	80	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	74	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.04	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).