Rachmaninoff 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.38	16	0.01	21	0.09	20	0.42	18	0.48	21	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		80	0.23	73	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.04	81	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.41	5	0.04	17	0.10	15	0.52	24	0.45	19	0.48
Bacha 2000		85	0.17	51	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Badura 1965		62	0.29	50	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	64	0.04	72	0.04
Barbosa 1983		20	0.40	15	0.01	24	0.09	29	0.34	51	0.07	37	0.15
Biret 1990		11	0.43	17	0.01	7	0.14	12	0.54	15	0.58	12	0.56
Blet 2003		38	0.35	38	0.00	48	0.07	48	0.07	43	0.13	44	0.10
Block 1995		30	0.37	61	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.24	48	0.07	40	0.13
Blumental 1952		42	0.35	9	0.01	23	0.10	22	0.39	32	0.28	27	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		81	0.22	72	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	71	0.04	85	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		12	0.43	12	0.01	12	0.11	14	0.54	11	0.66	4	0.60
Bunin 1987		7	0.44	27	0.00	8	0.10	9	0.57	4	0.61	7	0.59
Bunin 1987b		13	0.43	36	0.00	9	0.11	16	0.52	6	0.58	13	0.55
Chiu 1999		33	0.36	41	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.35	21	0.32	26	0.33
Cohen 1997		75	0.24	82	0.00	73	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	74	0.04
Cortot 1951		68	0.28	65	0.00	72	0.05	56	0.05	35	0.21	46	0.10
Csalog 1996		43	0.34	35	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.21	23	0.30	30	0.25
Czerny 1949		63	0.29	74	0.00	64	0.04	73	0.04	49	0.06	64	0.05
Czerny 1990		5	0.46	3	0.11	3	0.24	2	0.73	17	0.67	2	0.70
Duchoud 2007		61	0.29	70	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.22	45	0.10
Ezaki 2006		45	0.34	25	0.00	35	0.06	44	0.11	49	0.08	48	0.09
Falvay 1989		34	0.36	67	0.00	45	0.07	47	0.07	56	0.05	56	0.06
Farrell 1958		22	0.40	14	0.01	20	0.13	17	0.49	9	0.55	17	0.52
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.24	47	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	49	0.07	63	0.05
Fliere 1977		2	0.50	2	0.19	2	0.29	4	0.68	21	0.48	10	0.57
Fou 1978		24	0.38	58	0.00	28	0.10	23	0.38	40	0.21	29	0.28
Francois 1956		67	0.28	76	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	39	0.16	54	0.08
Friedman 1923		15	0.41	11	0.01	18	0.09	13	0.54	9	0.66	6	0.60
Friedman 1923b		18	0.40	29	0.00	19	0.10	11	0.55	10	0.64	8	0.59
Friedman 1930		27	0.37	8	0.01	26	0.09	19	0.43	19	0.51	20	0.47
Garcia 2007		74	0.24	88	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.03	83	0.03
Garcia 2007b		56	0.30	77	0.00	63	0.04	72	0.04	63	0.05	77	0.04
Gierzod 1998		83	0.18	54	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.03	82	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		57	0.30	43	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	68	0.04	75	0.04
Groot 1988		3	0.48	10	0.01	5	0.21	3	0.70	13	0.49	9	0.59
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.37	66	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.23	78	0.04	47	0.10
Hatto 1993		32	0.37	56	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.26	48	0.08	38	0.14
Hatto 1997		29	0.37	18	0.01	43	0.09	40	0.19	43	0.09	39	0.13
Horowitz 1949		8	0.44	23	0.00	10	0.12	7	0.60	2	0.70	3	0.65
Indjic 1988		31	0.37	63	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.20	58	0.06	42	0.11
Kapell 1951		26	0.38	60	0.00	39	0.08	35	0.24	52	0.06	41	0.12
Kissin 1993		73	0.24	49	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.06	71	0.04
Kushner 1989		55	0.30	62	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.04
Luisada 1991		10	0.43	6	0.02	16	0.09	25	0.38	28	0.28	25	0.33
Lushtak 2004		64	0.28	80	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		35	0.36	19	0.01	41	0.06	42	0.16	68	0.05	49	0.09
Magaloff 1978		19	0.40	42	0.00	13	0.10	26	0.38	32	0.26	28	0.31
Magin 1975		66	0.28	84	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.06	61	0.05
Michalowski 1933		70	0.27	90	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	41	0.16	51	0.08
Milkina 1970		60	0.29	89	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.05	69	0.04
Mohovich 1999		52	0.32	59	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	82	0.04	73	0.04
Moravec 1969		9	0.43	26	0.00	11	0.13	5	0.62	8	0.51	11	0.56
Morozova 2008		37	0.35	31	0.00	31	0.08	32	0.30	44	0.10	36	0.17
Neighaus 1950		71	0.26	55	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	53	0.05	76	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.40	20	0.01	22	0.10	18	0.46	9	0.53	18	0.49
Ohlsson 1999		54	0.30	45	0.00	56	0.04	65	0.04	63	0.04	70	0.04
Osinska 1989		72	0.25	85	0.00	54	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.05	66	0.04
Pachmann 1927		84	0.18	87	0.00	87	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.04	80	0.03
Paderewski 1930		86	0.13	68	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		78	0.23	30	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.11	55	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.23	37	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	44	0.10	60	0.05
Poblocka 1999		6	0.45	7	0.02	4	0.23	6	0.61	11	0.59	5	0.60
Rabcewiczowa 1932		46	0.34	46	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.31	31	0.37	24	0.34
Rachmaninoff 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		79	0.23	86	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	72	0.03	90	0.02
Richter 1976		23	0.38	69	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.17	51	0.06	43	0.10
Rosen 1989		49	0.34	13	0.01	30	0.07	30	0.31	39	0.16	33	0.22
Rosenthal 1930		1	0.53	1	0.40	1	0.40	1	0.85	5	0.87	1	0.86
Rosenthal 1931		65	0.28	22	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	18	0.59	34	0.19
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.30	32	0.00	47	0.09	45	0.09	11	0.64	32	0.24
Rosenthal 1931c		39	0.35	28	0.00	27	0.10	28	0.34	12	0.56	22	0.44
Rosenthal 1931d		40	0.35	40	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.41	7	0.74	15	0.55
Rossi 2007		87	0.10	83	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	51	0.06	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.36	57	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.25	28	0.24	31	0.24
Rubinstein 1952		69	0.27	71	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	77	0.03	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.34	64	0.00	49	0.06	51	0.06	53	0.07	58	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		47	0.34	44	0.00	50	0.07	49	0.07	15	0.40	35	0.17
Shebanova 2002		48	0.34	52	0.00	51	0.08	46	0.08	47	0.08	52	0.08
Smith 1975		53	0.31	33	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	52	0.06	59	0.05
Sokolov 2002		59	0.29	34	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.04	67	0.04
Sztompka 1959		14	0.41	24	0.00	15	0.10	10	0.55	18	0.51	16	0.53
Tomsic 1995		82	0.19	75	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03
Uninsky 1932		4	0.47	4	0.07	6	0.33	8	0.58	15	0.53	14	0.55
Uninsky 1971		41	0.35	39	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	50	0.06	50	0.09
Wasowski 1980		16	0.41	21	0.00	14	0.10	24	0.38	34	0.31	23	0.34
Zak 1937		50	0.33	79	0.00	52	0.05	52	0.05	48	0.07	57	0.06
Zak 1951		51	0.32	81	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.05	62	0.05
Random 1		89	0.00	78	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	21	0.36	53	0.08
Random 2		88	0.05	53	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	22	0.30	65	0.05
Random 3		90	-0.01	48	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	50	0.05	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).