Blumental 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.39	55	0.00	30	0.09	26	0.41	12	0.52	19	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.42	25	0.00	18	0.10	15	0.57	15	0.58	12	0.57
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.41	83	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.23	32	0.31	37	0.27
Bacha 2000		9	0.47	7	0.04	8	0.18	14	0.58	1	0.78	6	0.67
Badura 1965		57	0.33	36	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	48	0.05	65	0.05
Barbosa 1983		7	0.47	20	0.01	13	0.12	11	0.61	17	0.48	14	0.54
Biret 1990		60	0.32	79	0.00	67	0.05	70	0.05	55	0.05	71	0.05
Blet 2003		67	0.30	58	0.00	64	0.05	69	0.05	70	0.04	79	0.04
Block 1995		31	0.39	26	0.00	17	0.10	21	0.49	16	0.51	16	0.50
Blumental 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Boshniakovich 1969		46	0.35	52	0.00	61	0.06	55	0.06	60	0.05	68	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.49	2	0.19	3	0.23	7	0.68	4	0.74	4	0.71
Bunin 1987		62	0.31	47	0.00	55	0.06	53	0.06	42	0.13	48	0.09
Bunin 1987b		63	0.31	65	0.00	56	0.06	57	0.06	43	0.16	47	0.10
Chiu 1999		32	0.38	60	0.00	34	0.08	36	0.20	37	0.16	40	0.18
Cohen 1997		68	0.28	57	0.00	69	0.04	77	0.04	44	0.13	54	0.07
Cortot 1951		77	0.25	89	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	46	0.07	72	0.05
Csalog 1996		78	0.23	77	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03
Czerny 1949		73	0.26	78	0.00	73	0.06	60	0.06	50	0.06	58	0.06
Czerny 1990		10	0.46	3	0.06	4	0.13	4	0.75	14	0.70	3	0.72
Duchoud 2007		86	0.13	73	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.03
Ezaki 2006		16	0.44	13	0.02	20	0.08	25	0.44	23	0.51	18	0.47
Falvay 1989		13	0.45	16	0.01	21	0.11	17	0.52	25	0.34	21	0.42
Farrell 1958		79	0.23	42	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.03	84	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		34	0.37	22	0.01	25	0.09	24	0.45	7	0.74	10	0.58
Fliere 1977		12	0.45	14	0.02	12	0.13	13	0.58	37	0.25	24	0.38
Fou 1978		6	0.47	8	0.03	7	0.15	6	0.71	9	0.64	7	0.67
Francois 1956		84	0.18	63	0.00	84	0.05	68	0.05	77	0.03	81	0.04
Friedman 1923		69	0.28	44	0.00	72	0.07	50	0.07	63	0.05	61	0.06
Friedman 1923b		70	0.28	64	0.00	71	0.05	73	0.05	60	0.05	69	0.05
Friedman 1930		64	0.31	39	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	35	0.22	42	0.17
Garcia 2007		71	0.27	37	0.00	66	0.05	62	0.05	71	0.04	80	0.04
Garcia 2007b		50	0.34	80	0.00	52	0.07	48	0.07	26	0.28	44	0.14
Gierzod 1998		15	0.44	5	0.04	10	0.13	12	0.58	14	0.52	13	0.55
Gornostaeva 1994		66	0.30	56	0.00	68	0.05	65	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.05
Groot 1988		18	0.43	43	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.54	29	0.34	20	0.43
Harasiewicz 1955		17	0.43	24	0.00	16	0.14	22	0.48	41	0.15	38	0.27
Hatto 1993		1	0.52	1	0.27	1	0.27	1	0.79	6	0.71	1	0.75
Hatto 1997		4	0.48	40	0.00	6	0.16	5	0.73	8	0.59	8	0.66
Horowitz 1949		54	0.34	19	0.01	40	0.06	37	0.20	18	0.52	33	0.32
Indjic 1988		2	0.51	6	0.04	2	0.21	2	0.77	8	0.68	2	0.72
Kapell 1951		23	0.42	18	0.01	23	0.10	20	0.49	34	0.21	32	0.32
Kissin 1993		35	0.37	69	0.00	51	0.06	56	0.06	46	0.10	50	0.08
Kushner 1989		8	0.47	46	0.00	14	0.17	9	0.65	25	0.36	17	0.48
Luisada 1991		22	0.42	51	0.00	31	0.09	27	0.36	23	0.31	27	0.33
Lushtak 2004		43	0.35	74	0.00	59	0.05	66	0.05	52	0.05	66	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.44	9	0.03	11	0.14	10	0.64	17	0.50	11	0.57
Magaloff 1978		38	0.36	61	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	47	0.05	63	0.05
Magin 1975		25	0.41	75	0.00	26	0.10	30	0.32	32	0.35	29	0.33
Michalowski 1933		80	0.22	59	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	52	0.06	78	0.04
Milkina 1970		28	0.40	35	0.00	29	0.08	31	0.31	33	0.36	30	0.33
Mohovich 1999		29	0.40	21	0.01	28	0.07	28	0.35	35	0.31	31	0.33
Moravec 1969		11	0.46	10	0.03	9	0.18	8	0.67	5	0.63	9	0.65
Morozova 2008		47	0.35	11	0.03	35	0.06	41	0.14	71	0.04	52	0.07
Neighaus 1950		81	0.20	86	0.00	83	0.04	78	0.04	87	0.02	88	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.32	15	0.02	39	0.07	35	0.22	17	0.44	35	0.31
Ohlsson 1999		74	0.26	84	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	58	0.04	77	0.04
Osinska 1989		75	0.26	87	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.04	82	0.03
Pachmann 1927		82	0.19	67	0.00	85	0.05	71	0.05	76	0.04	76	0.04
Paderewski 1930		83	0.19	71	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	48	0.06	75	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.27	53	0.00	70	0.04	75	0.04	69	0.04	73	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		85	0.17	90	0.00	79	0.03	86	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03
Poblocka 1999		26	0.41	49	0.00	27	0.08	29	0.33	33	0.29	34	0.31
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.30	45	0.00	58	0.05	67	0.05	45	0.07	55	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		45	0.35	27	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.28	22	0.39	28	0.33
Rangell 2001		76	0.26	76	0.00	82	0.04	79	0.04	86	0.02	87	0.03
Richter 1976		51	0.34	85	0.00	63	0.07	46	0.07	50	0.06	57	0.06
Rosen 1989		56	0.33	70	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.15	77	0.03	53	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		40	0.35	23	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	16	0.60	36	0.27
Rosenthal 1931		44	0.35	41	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.26	17	0.60	23	0.39
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.33	29	0.00	45	0.06	58	0.06	16	0.58	39	0.19
Rosenthal 1931c		48	0.34	48	0.00	46	0.06	54	0.06	20	0.48	43	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		61	0.31	66	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.20	11	0.57	26	0.34
Rossi 2007		87	0.06	88	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	79	0.02	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.37	31	0.00	37	0.07	42	0.14	31	0.21	41	0.17
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.36	38	0.00	53	0.08	45	0.08	56	0.05	60	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		19	0.42	32	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.50	31	0.23	25	0.34
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.42	17	0.01	24	0.09	23	0.47	4	0.61	15	0.54
Shebanova 2002		21	0.42	12	0.02	15	0.11	18	0.50	31	0.34	22	0.41
Smith 1975		42	0.35	34	0.00	57	0.06	59	0.06	34	0.25	45	0.12
Sokolov 2002		52	0.34	33	0.00	62	0.07	49	0.07	43	0.10	49	0.08
Sztompka 1959		49	0.34	28	0.00	41	0.07	39	0.17	45	0.07	46	0.11
Tomsic 1995		55	0.33	68	0.00	65	0.05	72	0.05	66	0.04	74	0.04
Uninsky 1932		41	0.35	50	0.00	50	0.05	64	0.05	42	0.14	51	0.08
Uninsky 1971		5	0.47	4	0.05	5	0.14	3	0.75	5	0.66	5	0.70
Wasowski 1980		53	0.34	62	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.05	62	0.05
Zak 1937		37	0.37	72	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	53	0.05	64	0.05
Zak 1951		33	0.38	30	0.00	54	0.07	47	0.07	46	0.06	56	0.06
Random 1		89	-0.07	81	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	38	0.13	67	0.05
Random 2		88	0.02	82	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	36	0.18	59	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.09	54	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	61	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).