Osinska 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		76	0.28	71	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		61	0.34	48	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	37	0.29	49	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		78	0.26	58	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.04	87	0.03
Bacha 2000		81	0.23	44	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03
Badura 1965		74	0.29	84	0.00	66	0.05	53	0.05	34	0.17	56	0.09
Barbosa 1983		55	0.37	59	0.00	49	0.04	69	0.04	54	0.07	71	0.05
Biret 1990		4	0.55	3	0.17	2	0.39	4	0.74	1	0.86	4	0.80
Blet 2003		72	0.30	81	0.00	72	0.05	66	0.05	62	0.04	77	0.04
Block 1995		30	0.44	17	0.00	28	0.11	31	0.30	23	0.48	32	0.38
Blumental 1952		77	0.26	88	0.00	80	0.04	73	0.04	81	0.03	86	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.47	62	0.00	16	0.15	17	0.56	14	0.57	19	0.56
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.36	36	0.00	68	0.05	50	0.05	41	0.15	54	0.09
Bunin 1987		68	0.32	51	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	41	0.14	62	0.08
Bunin 1987b		67	0.32	74	0.00	62	0.04	71	0.04	34	0.25	53	0.10
Chiu 1999		41	0.40	15	0.00	41	0.05	44	0.11	26	0.25	42	0.17
Cohen 1997		40	0.40	64	0.00	37	0.08	38	0.21	14	0.58	37	0.35
Cortot 1951		43	0.39	54	0.00	36	0.08	37	0.21	6	0.65	36	0.37
Csalog 1996		7	0.52	6	0.02	7	0.17	6	0.69	1	0.72	6	0.70
Czerny 1949		13	0.48	27	0.00	14	0.12	15	0.58	9	0.74	10	0.66
Czerny 1990		59	0.35	31	0.00	65	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.06	67	0.06
Duchoud 2007		65	0.33	45	0.00	64	0.06	48	0.06	23	0.34	45	0.14
Ezaki 2006		23	0.46	10	0.01	17	0.15	24	0.46	21	0.52	24	0.49
Falvay 1989		11	0.49	8	0.02	8	0.24	7	0.66	2	0.63	12	0.64
Farrell 1958		53	0.37	50	0.00	32	0.07	30	0.31	10	0.53	30	0.41
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.37	25	0.00	59	0.06	46	0.06	20	0.63	41	0.19
Fliere 1977		8	0.51	11	0.01	11	0.13	12	0.62	18	0.49	20	0.55
Fou 1978		46	0.39	77	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	45	0.07	64	0.06
Francois 1956		33	0.42	22	0.00	39	0.08	36	0.23	9	0.70	31	0.40
Friedman 1923		69	0.32	26	0.00	75	0.05	60	0.05	41	0.12	63	0.08
Friedman 1923b		63	0.33	35	0.00	74	0.05	56	0.05	42	0.16	57	0.09
Friedman 1930		62	0.34	63	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.06	72	0.05
Garcia 2007		60	0.34	67	0.00	47	0.05	59	0.05	22	0.38	46	0.14
Garcia 2007b		75	0.28	21	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	36	0.16	58	0.09
Gierzod 1998		31	0.44	75	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.35	21	0.40	35	0.37
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.60	2	0.21	4	0.35	2	0.80	1	0.84	2	0.82
Groot 1988		58	0.36	42	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.06	74	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		1	0.63	1	0.33	1	0.33	1	0.84	1	0.82	1	0.83
Hatto 1993		34	0.41	73	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.17	50	0.07	52	0.11
Hatto 1997		19	0.47	37	0.00	21	0.08	23	0.47	18	0.47	26	0.47
Horowitz 1949		82	0.23	79	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.04	81	0.03
Indjic 1988		36	0.41	46	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.17	66	0.05	55	0.09
Kapell 1951		39	0.40	52	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.16	38	0.17	43	0.16
Kissin 1993		71	0.31	60	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.06	70	0.05
Kushner 1989		29	0.44	14	0.01	19	0.15	18	0.52	18	0.47	25	0.49
Luisada 1991		49	0.38	66	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	52	0.06	68	0.05
Lushtak 2004		28	0.44	30	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.50	10	0.60	21	0.55
Malcuzynski 1961		56	0.36	41	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.20	37	0.22	40	0.21
Magaloff 1978		6	0.53	18	0.00	9	0.12	10	0.62	3	0.69	11	0.65
Magin 1975		45	0.39	16	0.00	48	0.05	67	0.05	36	0.28	47	0.12
Michalowski 1933		66	0.32	53	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	30	0.31	51	0.11
Milkina 1970		24	0.45	4	0.08	6	0.20	9	0.64	8	0.69	9	0.66
Mohovich 1999		18	0.47	61	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.51	8	0.65	15	0.58
Moravec 1969		44	0.39	76	0.00	51	0.05	68	0.05	41	0.14	59	0.08
Morozova 2008		51	0.37	28	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.29	27	0.40	38	0.34
Neighaus 1950		27	0.44	39	0.00	29	0.09	29	0.33	17	0.44	34	0.38
Niedzielski 1931		85	0.22	29	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.03	89	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.47	5	0.03	15	0.15	16	0.56	3	0.62	14	0.59
Osinska 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pachmann 1927		37	0.41	20	0.00	53	0.04	70	0.04	24	0.39	48	0.12
Paderewski 1930		83	0.22	55	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.43	80	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.29	8	0.59	29	0.41
Pierdomenico 2008		35	0.41	47	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.12	12	0.54	39	0.25
Poblocka 1999		26	0.44	34	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.42	18	0.51	27	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		22	0.46	68	0.00	24	0.13	21	0.50	2	0.72	13	0.60
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.25	83	0.00	76	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.04	75	0.04
Rangell 2001		42	0.40	72	0.00	31	0.06	34	0.26	12	0.55	33	0.38
Richter 1976		38	0.41	38	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	70	0.05	69	0.05
Rosen 1989		2	0.60	7	0.02	3	0.30	3	0.79	2	0.81	3	0.80
Rosenthal 1930		79	0.25	85	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	66	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.21	82	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	68	0.04	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.21	89	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	57	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		73	0.30	69	0.00	70	0.03	80	0.03	58	0.05	79	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.22	65	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	51	0.05	78	0.04
Rossi 2007		25	0.45	13	0.01	34	0.07	35	0.25	1	0.85	28	0.46
Rubinstein 1939		50	0.38	70	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	23	0.38	44	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		5	0.53	12	0.01	5	0.26	5	0.72	2	0.76	5	0.74
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.48	9	0.02	13	0.15	13	0.59	16	0.53	18	0.56
Schilhawsky 1960		47	0.38	57	0.00	58	0.05	49	0.05	27	0.31	50	0.12
Shebanova 2002		48	0.38	43	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	70	0.05	73	0.05
Smith 1975		21	0.46	19	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.41	11	0.60	23	0.50
Sokolov 2002		20	0.46	32	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.46	4	0.69	17	0.56
Sztompka 1959		70	0.32	78	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	62	0.05	76	0.04
Tomsic 1995		52	0.37	33	0.00	52	0.05	63	0.05	42	0.14	60	0.08
Uninsky 1932		64	0.33	40	0.00	54	0.04	74	0.04	37	0.15	61	0.08
Uninsky 1971		17	0.47	56	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.49	12	0.53	22	0.51
Wasowski 1980		14	0.48	24	0.00	18	0.14	14	0.59	11	0.56	16	0.57
Zak 1937		10	0.50	49	0.00	12	0.16	11	0.62	3	0.71	8	0.66
Zak 1951		9	0.50	23	0.00	10	0.15	8	0.65	3	0.72	7	0.68
Random 1		89	-0.03	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	51	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		88	0.01	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	38	0.17	65	0.06
Random 3		90	-0.04	86	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.32	66	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).