Friedman 1923b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.29	68	0.00	53	0.04	71	0.04	40	0.14	45	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		73	0.22	19	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.43	30	0.00	6	0.21	6	0.70	17	0.56	5	0.63
Bacha 2000		81	0.18	69	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.03
Badura 1965		22	0.39	70	0.00	17	0.11	22	0.52	7	0.57	10	0.54
Barbosa 1983		48	0.29	36	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	69	0.05	54	0.05
Biret 1990		68	0.24	71	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	71	0.04	72	0.04
Blet 2003		21	0.39	15	0.00	25	0.13	23	0.48	19	0.47	17	0.47
Block 1995		17	0.40	37	0.00	19	0.13	17	0.55	28	0.35	19	0.44
Blumental 1952		58	0.28	31	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.05	57	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		20	0.39	27	0.00	15	0.13	15	0.56	42	0.16	28	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.31	38	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	38	0.17	39	0.12
Bunin 1987		47	0.30	72	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.29	58	0.05	41	0.12
Bunin 1987b		57	0.28	73	0.00	45	0.07	47	0.07	49	0.06	48	0.06
Chiu 1999		23	0.38	48	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.42	34	0.17	29	0.27
Cohen 1997		80	0.18	74	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		83	0.16	75	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.03
Csalog 1996		40	0.33	28	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	51	0.07	49	0.06
Czerny 1949		86	0.11	76	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03
Czerny 1990		26	0.37	14	0.00	20	0.14	20	0.53	36	0.27	22	0.38
Duchoud 2007		51	0.29	5	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.16	38	0.13	33	0.14
Ezaki 2006		75	0.20	49	0.00	78	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.03	75	0.03
Falvay 1989		71	0.23	20	0.00	71	0.05	61	0.05	82	0.03	62	0.04
Farrell 1958		59	0.28	44	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	53	0.06	47	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.09	50	0.00	87	0.04	78	0.04	76	0.04	69	0.04
Fliere 1977		3	0.49	32	0.00	5	0.23	3	0.73	28	0.38	11	0.53
Fou 1978		27	0.36	25	0.00	24	0.13	25	0.46	57	0.05	32	0.15
Francois 1956		74	0.22	51	0.00	54	0.04	72	0.04	48	0.05	74	0.04
Friedman 1923		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Friedman 1923b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1930		2	0.68	3	0.00	2	0.84	2	0.95	2	0.94	2	0.94
Garcia 2007		56	0.28	29	0.00	61	0.06	49	0.06	51	0.05	56	0.05
Garcia 2007b		52	0.29	77	0.00	52	0.06	55	0.06	76	0.04	59	0.05
Gierzod 1998		70	0.23	45	0.00	76	0.04	68	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		67	0.25	52	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.11	65	0.04	46	0.07
Groot 1988		35	0.34	7	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.35	51	0.05	38	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.40	4	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.39	56	0.05	35	0.14
Hatto 1993		31	0.35	33	0.00	32	0.09	28	0.40	59	0.05	34	0.14
Hatto 1997		65	0.26	78	0.00	65	0.06	52	0.06	82	0.03	68	0.04
Horowitz 1949		24	0.38	21	0.00	23	0.14	18	0.54	8	0.63	8	0.58
Indjic 1988		33	0.34	79	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.37	51	0.07	31	0.16
Kapell 1951		53	0.29	80	0.00	60	0.06	51	0.06	67	0.05	53	0.05
Kissin 1993		28	0.36	10	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.37	40	0.27	26	0.32
Kushner 1989		30	0.35	8	0.00	37	0.10	33	0.34	67	0.05	36	0.13
Luisada 1991		18	0.40	53	0.00	22	0.13	19	0.54	33	0.24	23	0.36
Lushtak 2004		44	0.31	81	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.13	49	0.05	44	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.33	54	0.00	50	0.05	62	0.05	71	0.04	64	0.04
Magaloff 1978		12	0.42	55	0.00	10	0.09	14	0.58	23	0.38	16	0.47
Magin 1975		36	0.33	56	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.18	54	0.05	43	0.09
Michalowski 1933		39	0.33	57	0.00	26	0.09	38	0.23	24	0.38	27	0.30
Milkina 1970		78	0.19	82	0.00	73	0.05	65	0.05	85	0.02	80	0.03
Mohovich 1999		63	0.27	58	0.00	67	0.05	66	0.05	66	0.04	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		64	0.26	22	0.00	69	0.04	73	0.04	75	0.03	77	0.03
Morozova 2008		41	0.33	6	0.00	27	0.09	35	0.32	61	0.05	37	0.13
Neighaus 1950		4	0.46	34	0.00	3	0.31	7	0.68	1	0.64	4	0.66
Niedzielski 1931		25	0.37	16	0.00	11	0.10	24	0.47	14	0.46	18	0.46
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.42	83	0.00	13	0.13	13	0.59	16	0.41	15	0.49
Osinska 1989		37	0.33	23	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.16	56	0.05	42	0.09
Pachmann 1927		11	0.42	2	0.00	12	0.11	21	0.52	7	0.61	9	0.56
Paderewski 1930		42	0.32	11	0.00	38	0.09	39	0.23	24	0.44	25	0.32
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.35	12	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.33	25	0.37	24	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.28	46	0.00	63	0.06	54	0.06	54	0.04	52	0.05
Poblocka 1999		34	0.34	26	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.23	51	0.06	40	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		85	0.14	59	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		15	0.40	39	0.00	9	0.11	10	0.64	11	0.55	7	0.59
Rangell 2001		46	0.30	84	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	47	0.06	50	0.06
Richter 1976		14	0.41	35	0.00	21	0.10	16	0.56	32	0.30	21	0.41
Rosen 1989		9	0.42	60	0.00	16	0.16	8	0.66	23	0.30	20	0.44
Rosenthal 1930		60	0.28	9	0.00	68	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.05	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.17	85	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	74	0.04	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.19	40	0.00	77	0.02	88	0.02	69	0.03	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.24	86	0.00	62	0.07	48	0.07	59	0.05	51	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.19	61	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	48	0.06	58	0.05
Rossi 2007		79	0.18	24	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.05	61	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		72	0.23	62	0.00	72	0.05	56	0.05	88	0.02	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		50	0.29	63	0.00	55	0.05	67	0.05	78	0.03	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.31	64	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	79	0.03	67	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.29	47	0.00	51	0.05	63	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05
Shebanova 2002		6	0.44	65	0.00	4	0.22	11	0.62	23	0.46	13	0.53
Smith 1975		62	0.27	41	0.00	70	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	63	0.04
Sokolov 2002		66	0.26	17	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.04	60	0.04
Sztompka 1959		16	0.40	42	0.00	18	0.11	9	0.64	23	0.42	14	0.52
Tomsic 1995		84	0.15	66	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.03	81	0.03
Uninsky 1932		29	0.36	67	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.41	41	0.14	30	0.24
Uninsky 1971		61	0.27	87	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	69	0.04	65	0.04
Wasowski 1980		7	0.44	18	0.00	8	0.25	4	0.72	23	0.48	6	0.59
Zak 1937		5	0.44	43	0.00	7	0.24	5	0.72	6	0.64	3	0.68
Zak 1951		13	0.41	88	0.00	14	0.16	12	0.62	15	0.45	12	0.53
Random 1		88	-0.06	89	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	68	0.02	86	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.11	13	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).