Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		28	0.34	66	0.00	32	0.08	26	0.49	46	0.06	32	0.17
Anderszewski 2003		41	0.31	10	0.03	8	0.11	28	0.48	49	0.07	28	0.18
Ashkenazy 1981		66	0.25	60	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Bacha 2000		43	0.30	45	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.34	36	0.20	23	0.26
Badura 1965		79	0.22	48	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.03	84	0.03
Barbosa 1983		49	0.29	77	0.00	49	0.07	48	0.07	67	0.05	51	0.06
Biret 1990		15	0.37	39	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.57	29	0.38	10	0.47
Blet 2003		76	0.23	52	0.00	79	0.03	66	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Block 1995		64	0.25	80	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	87	0.03	65	0.04
Blumental 1952		51	0.28	44	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	77	0.04	48	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.31	84	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.30	54	0.06	38	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.29	37	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.20	57	0.06	39	0.11
Bunin 1987		74	0.23	83	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Bunin 1987b		77	0.22	50	0.00	76	0.03	69	0.03	87	0.03	73	0.03
Chiu 1999		35	0.31	31	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	76	0.04	55	0.05
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		16	0.36	27	0.00	20	0.08	11	0.61	10	0.62	5	0.61
Csalog 1996		57	0.26	61	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04	63	0.04
Czerny 1949		10	0.38	20	0.01	13	0.09	12	0.59	24	0.53	7	0.56
Czerny 1990		67	0.25	57	0.00	70	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.03
Duchoud 2007		62	0.25	36	0.00	56	0.03	70	0.03	71	0.04	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		2	0.44	1	0.21	1	0.21	4	0.71	19	0.54	4	0.62
Falvay 1989		12	0.38	19	0.01	21	0.08	19	0.55	43	0.10	24	0.23
Farrell 1958		34	0.31	51	0.00	46	0.08	46	0.08	48	0.07	47	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.27	58	0.00	38	0.09	36	0.28	30	0.51	14	0.38
Fliere 1977		50	0.29	40	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	86	0.03	67	0.03
Fou 1978		37	0.31	74	0.00	48	0.06	52	0.06	71	0.04	56	0.05
Francois 1956		3	0.43	2	0.12	2	0.22	2	0.73	6	0.76	1	0.74
Friedman 1923		83	0.18	79	0.00	85	0.03	79	0.03	76	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		84	0.18	86	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1930		72	0.24	89	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		60	0.26	41	0.00	52	0.06	51	0.06	43	0.10	46	0.08
Garcia 2007b		32	0.32	11	0.02	29	0.08	31	0.42	33	0.20	22	0.29
Gierzod 1998		44	0.30	78	0.00	37	0.09	32	0.40	49	0.07	33	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.41	6	0.04	5	0.11	7	0.63	24	0.46	9	0.54
Groot 1988		22	0.35	54	0.00	24	0.09	21	0.54	44	0.10	25	0.23
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.38	12	0.02	25	0.10	27	0.49	68	0.05	36	0.16
Hatto 1993		53	0.28	81	0.00	47	0.09	45	0.09	74	0.04	54	0.06
Hatto 1997		26	0.34	17	0.01	14	0.10	15	0.58	55	0.05	31	0.17
Horowitz 1949		82	0.19	67	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	65	0.04	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		59	0.26	87	0.00	51	0.07	47	0.07	59	0.06	50	0.06
Kapell 1951		71	0.24	28	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Kissin 1993		86	0.17	88	0.00	86	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.04	79	0.03
Kushner 1989		18	0.36	18	0.01	35	0.07	39	0.24	81	0.03	43	0.08
Luisada 1991		52	0.28	72	0.00	62	0.03	68	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		20	0.35	59	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.58	56	0.05	34	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		45	0.30	63	0.00	40	0.08	43	0.20	77	0.03	44	0.08
Magaloff 1978		23	0.34	29	0.00	31	0.08	33	0.39	72	0.03	41	0.11
Magin 1975		68	0.24	42	0.00	72	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03	70	0.03
Michalowski 1933		87	0.15	85	0.00	87	0.03	85	0.03	86	0.03	78	0.03
Milkina 1970		27	0.34	5	0.05	7	0.14	6	0.64	37	0.29	13	0.43
Mohovich 1999		19	0.35	30	0.00	27	0.12	20	0.55	47	0.06	30	0.18
Moravec 1969		31	0.32	55	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	55	0.06	49	0.06
Morozova 2008		55	0.27	71	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	86	0.03	81	0.03
Neighaus 1950		25	0.34	15	0.01	26	0.12	30	0.47	38	0.20	20	0.31
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.23	73	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	48	0.05	60	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		17	0.36	24	0.00	15	0.10	24	0.51	67	0.04	37	0.14
Osinska 1989		6	0.40	25	0.00	11	0.10	14	0.58	38	0.21	16	0.35
Pachmann 1927		69	0.24	56	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.17	62	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	62	0.04	76	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.31	35	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	75	0.04	58	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		30	0.33	32	0.00	39	0.09	41	0.22	32	0.20	26	0.21
Poblocka 1999		65	0.25	49	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		4	0.41	4	0.10	4	0.29	3	0.72	14	0.56	3	0.63
Rachmaninoff 1923		73	0.24	76	0.00	63	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04
Rangell 2001		21	0.35	21	0.01	23	0.09	22	0.53	31	0.39	11	0.45
Richter 1976		58	0.26	70	0.00	78	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		13	0.38	14	0.01	17	0.11	10	0.62	47	0.05	29	0.18
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.29	33	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.24	32	0.38	21	0.30
Rosenthal 1931		42	0.30	46	0.00	22	0.08	23	0.53	19	0.57	8	0.55
Rosenthal 1931b		40	0.31	22	0.01	18	0.09	16	0.58	15	0.59	6	0.58
Rosenthal 1931c		33	0.32	8	0.03	28	0.12	29	0.47	23	0.43	12	0.45
Rosenthal 1931d		61	0.26	34	0.00	42	0.10	40	0.22	18	0.43	19	0.31
Rossi 2007		54	0.28	47	0.00	60	0.04	58	0.04	30	0.30	40	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		29	0.34	53	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.49	51	0.05	35	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.39	16	0.01	10	0.10	9	0.62	42	0.21	15	0.36
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.40	7	0.04	6	0.13	8	0.63	35	0.18	17	0.34
Schilhawsky 1960		81	0.21	75	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	89	0.02
Shebanova 2002		48	0.29	26	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	77	0.05	57	0.05
Smith 1975		1	0.45	3	0.12	3	0.24	1	0.79	7	0.63	2	0.71
Sokolov 2002		80	0.21	43	0.00	81	0.03	71	0.03	71	0.03	69	0.03
Sztompka 1959		39	0.31	64	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.04	62	0.04
Tomsic 1995		14	0.37	13	0.02	12	0.08	18	0.56	38	0.19	18	0.33
Uninsky 1932		63	0.25	68	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04
Uninsky 1971		8	0.40	23	0.00	9	0.11	5	0.68	61	0.05	27	0.18
Wasowski 1980		24	0.34	9	0.03	34	0.08	38	0.24	78	0.04	42	0.10
Zak 1937		78	0.22	82	0.00	68	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.04	72	0.03
Zak 1951		70	0.24	90	0.00	58	0.04	57	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.01	69	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	27	0.31	52	0.06
Random 2		88	0.07	38	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.30	45	0.08
Random 3		90	-0.01	65	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	20	0.31	53	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).