Rosenthal 1931b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.37	48	0.00	10	0.23	8	0.72	20	0.47	7	0.58
Anderszewski 2003		13	0.33	15	0.00	16	0.16	13	0.62	54	0.07	16	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.26	42	0.00	30	0.11	28	0.44	70	0.05	25	0.15
Bacha 2000		16	0.32	23	0.00	21	0.21	19	0.53	22	0.33	12	0.42
Badura 1965		25	0.28	12	0.00	26	0.08	22	0.50	61	0.04	27	0.14
Barbosa 1983		47	0.22	43	0.00	69	0.03	70	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03
Biret 1990		60	0.20	34	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	85	0.03	83	0.03
Blet 2003		49	0.21	49	0.00	51	0.05	50	0.05	80	0.03	56	0.04
Block 1995		65	0.19	16	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	82	0.03	59	0.04
Blumental 1952		14	0.33	28	0.00	11	0.19	16	0.58	58	0.06	18	0.19
Boshniakovich 1969		53	0.21	79	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	84	0.04	49	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		7	0.39	11	0.00	7	0.19	5	0.77	17	0.58	6	0.67
Bunin 1987		48	0.21	80	0.00	68	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		50	0.21	56	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04
Chiu 1999		55	0.21	44	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	78	0.04	53	0.04
Cohen 1997		19	0.31	31	0.00	13	0.14	15	0.59	16	0.58	8	0.58
Cortot 1951		42	0.23	72	0.00	53	0.05	49	0.05	56	0.06	52	0.05
Csalog 1996		54	0.21	17	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	74	0.04	55	0.04
Czerny 1949		58	0.20	73	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.05	48	0.05
Czerny 1990		76	0.17	81	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		83	0.11	74	0.00	80	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.03	88	0.02
Ezaki 2006		8	0.37	5	0.00	6	0.17	9	0.72	33	0.40	9	0.54
Falvay 1989		17	0.32	38	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.46	74	0.04	26	0.14
Farrell 1958		62	0.20	50	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.02	69	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		6	0.40	6	0.00	8	0.15	7	0.75	6	0.76	5	0.75
Fliere 1977		29	0.27	65	0.00	33	0.09	31	0.37	78	0.04	29	0.12
Fou 1978		20	0.30	4	0.00	29	0.14	25	0.46	84	0.03	31	0.12
Francois 1956		56	0.20	66	0.00	31	0.10	32	0.32	38	0.16	15	0.23
Friedman 1923		61	0.20	51	0.00	67	0.05	54	0.05	85	0.03	61	0.04
Friedman 1923b		63	0.19	24	0.00	66	0.03	69	0.03	88	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1930		59	0.20	82	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	70	0.04	43	0.07
Garcia 2007		74	0.17	83	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	86	0.03	80	0.03
Garcia 2007b		81	0.13	67	0.00	77	0.04	63	0.04	85	0.02	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		5	0.42	25	0.00	5	0.33	6	0.76	25	0.35	11	0.52
Gornostaeva 1994		40	0.23	75	0.00	37	0.08	36	0.25	81	0.03	38	0.09
Groot 1988		30	0.26	45	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.49	49	0.06	23	0.17
Harasiewicz 1955		39	0.24	29	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.18	86	0.02	45	0.06
Hatto 1993		37	0.25	52	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	87	0.02	51	0.05
Hatto 1997		26	0.28	57	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.31	59	0.05	33	0.12
Horowitz 1949		71	0.17	68	0.00	56	0.03	71	0.03	57	0.04	71	0.03
Indjic 1988		43	0.23	76	0.00	57	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03
Kapell 1951		78	0.16	84	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03	70	0.03
Kissin 1993		82	0.12	58	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	87	0.02
Kushner 1989		22	0.30	21	0.00	22	0.09	30	0.38	83	0.03	35	0.11
Luisada 1991		66	0.19	35	0.00	65	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	62	0.03
Lushtak 2004		21	0.30	26	0.00	19	0.18	17	0.58	58	0.05	22	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		35	0.26	53	0.00	23	0.07	29	0.42	73	0.04	28	0.13
Magaloff 1978		33	0.26	85	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.29	57	0.05	30	0.12
Magin 1975		67	0.18	69	0.00	75	0.03	68	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Michalowski 1933		85	0.10	36	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		32	0.26	59	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.23	55	0.05	36	0.11
Mohovich 1999		12	0.34	9	0.00	15	0.18	12	0.64	59	0.05	20	0.18
Moravec 1969		11	0.35	60	0.00	12	0.15	18	0.58	49	0.06	17	0.19
Morozova 2008		28	0.27	18	0.00	32	0.10	34	0.30	59	0.05	32	0.12
Neighaus 1950		46	0.22	54	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	85	0.03	50	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		38	0.25	46	0.00	17	0.16	20	0.53	35	0.24	13	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		68	0.18	61	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.04	76	0.03
Osinska 1989		52	0.21	86	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	81	0.03	64	0.03
Pachmann 1927		86	0.10	62	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Paderewski 1930		80	0.14	27	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.04	73	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		69	0.17	39	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03	63	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		77	0.16	40	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.04	68	0.03
Poblocka 1999		75	0.17	87	0.00	60	0.04	56	0.04	83	0.03	65	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.32	20	0.00	9	0.18	10	0.67	29	0.40	10	0.52
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.30	30	0.00	14	0.13	11	0.64	45	0.09	14	0.24
Rangell 2001		45	0.22	55	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.17	81	0.02	44	0.06
Richter 1976		79	0.15	19	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.03
Rosen 1989		18	0.31	63	0.00	28	0.10	24	0.48	81	0.03	34	0.12
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.60	7	0.00	4	0.83	4	0.93	1	0.90	4	0.91
Rosenthal 1931		1	0.85	1	0.77	1	0.77	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.76	3	0.04	3	0.90	3	0.97	1	0.97	3	0.97
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.83	2	0.18	2	0.85	2	0.99	1	0.99	2	0.99
Rossi 2007		84	0.11	88	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	67	0.04	67	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		27	0.27	10	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.15	70	0.03	42	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.20	89	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.04	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.35	70	0.00	20	0.20	14	0.62	70	0.04	24	0.16
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.21	90	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.05
Shebanova 2002		73	0.17	13	0.00	72	0.04	66	0.04	81	0.04	58	0.04
Smith 1975		34	0.26	37	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.46	55	0.06	21	0.17
Sokolov 2002		72	0.17	22	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03	66	0.03
Sztompka 1959		70	0.17	77	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	86	0.03	75	0.03
Tomsic 1995		44	0.22	32	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.17	78	0.04	40	0.08
Uninsky 1932		64	0.19	41	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	85	0.03	57	0.04
Uninsky 1971		23	0.30	33	0.00	18	0.15	21	0.52	54	0.06	19	0.18
Wasowski 1980		87	0.07	71	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02
Zak 1937		41	0.23	64	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	65	0.05	46	0.05
Zak 1951		36	0.25	8	0.00	34	0.08	38	0.21	86	0.03	39	0.08
Random 1		89	0.00	14	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	29	0.29	41	0.08
Random 2		88	0.04	47	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	13	0.39	37	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.08	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	76	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).