Ferenczy 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		19	0.35	17	0.00	22	0.12	17	0.66	39	0.16	17	0.32
Anderszewski 2003		23	0.34	35	0.00	15	0.10	22	0.62	43	0.14	18	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		79	0.12	44	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03
Bacha 2000		33	0.29	25	0.00	35	0.10	37	0.34	53	0.05	33	0.13
Badura 1965		29	0.31	26	0.00	29	0.12	29	0.53	43	0.11	19	0.24
Barbosa 1983		31	0.30	76	0.00	31	0.12	33	0.40	79	0.03	38	0.11
Biret 1990		41	0.25	59	0.00	43	0.09	42	0.19	75	0.03	42	0.08
Blet 2003		68	0.16	24	0.00	56	0.06	57	0.06	85	0.02	77	0.03
Block 1995		30	0.31	5	0.05	11	0.09	27	0.55	58	0.05	28	0.17
Blumental 1952		11	0.37	3	0.09	3	0.19	7	0.74	24	0.45	8	0.58
Boshniakovich 1969		59	0.20	74	0.00	46	0.08	46	0.08	81	0.04	46	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.43	7	0.03	4	0.22	2	0.79	16	0.63	3	0.71
Bunin 1987		51	0.22	84	0.00	60	0.04	71	0.04	68	0.04	62	0.04
Bunin 1987b		57	0.21	68	0.00	61	0.04	74	0.04	73	0.03	73	0.03
Chiu 1999		42	0.25	49	0.00	44	0.09	44	0.18	80	0.03	45	0.07
Cohen 1997		37	0.27	66	0.00	32	0.13	30	0.51	36	0.28	16	0.38
Cortot 1951		28	0.32	22	0.00	33	0.13	31	0.50	27	0.31	15	0.39
Csalog 1996		35	0.28	70	0.00	39	0.11	38	0.34	68	0.04	37	0.12
Czerny 1949		9	0.39	13	0.01	14	0.11	8	0.73	26	0.53	6	0.62
Czerny 1990		66	0.17	85	0.00	71	0.05	59	0.05	85	0.03	64	0.04
Duchoud 2007		86	0.04	71	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Ezaki 2006		2	0.45	4	0.07	2	0.18	4	0.77	27	0.45	7	0.59
Falvay 1989		1	0.47	1	0.45	1	0.44	1	0.82	9	0.47	5	0.62
Farrell 1958		47	0.23	52	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	82	0.02	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		52	0.22	80	0.00	63	0.06	58	0.06	80	0.04	49	0.05
Fou 1978		12	0.37	30	0.00	18	0.12	10	0.71	63	0.04	26	0.17
Francois 1956		55	0.21	40	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	78	0.03	66	0.04
Friedman 1923		84	0.08	78	0.00	81	0.03	84	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		83	0.09	88	0.00	82	0.04	76	0.04	78	0.04	63	0.04
Friedman 1930		82	0.09	81	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Garcia 2007		67	0.17	57	0.00	69	0.05	66	0.05	87	0.02	82	0.03
Garcia 2007b		77	0.13	86	0.00	74	0.06	56	0.06	82	0.03	67	0.04
Gierzod 1998		7	0.39	14	0.01	16	0.11	15	0.68	60	0.05	25	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.39	29	0.00	9	0.10	9	0.73	34	0.32	13	0.48
Groot 1988		62	0.19	60	0.00	55	0.08	48	0.08	73	0.04	47	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		21	0.35	45	0.00	25	0.13	26	0.55	73	0.05	29	0.17
Hatto 1993		36	0.27	53	0.00	42	0.09	41	0.23	81	0.03	44	0.08
Hatto 1997		18	0.35	31	0.00	23	0.16	19	0.65	61	0.05	24	0.18
Horowitz 1949		70	0.16	28	0.00	45	0.08	47	0.08	42	0.12	40	0.10
Indjic 1988		43	0.25	42	0.00	50	0.09	45	0.09	84	0.03	53	0.05
Kapell 1951		61	0.19	72	0.00	64	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.04	58	0.04
Kissin 1993		76	0.13	51	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Kushner 1989		54	0.21	73	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	77	0.04	52	0.05
Luisada 1991		49	0.23	23	0.00	53	0.07	51	0.07	77	0.04	48	0.05
Lushtak 2004		27	0.32	8	0.02	30	0.10	28	0.54	67	0.04	31	0.15
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.24	27	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.24	79	0.03	41	0.08
Magaloff 1978		60	0.19	43	0.00	62	0.05	63	0.05	67	0.04	55	0.04
Magin 1975		81	0.09	61	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.03
Michalowski 1933		87	0.03	69	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.02	86	0.02
Milkina 1970		25	0.34	37	0.00	28	0.11	25	0.55	56	0.05	27	0.17
Mohovich 1999		8	0.39	2	0.09	6	0.24	5	0.77	34	0.32	12	0.50
Moravec 1969		17	0.36	18	0.00	20	0.13	16	0.67	53	0.06	21	0.20
Morozova 2008		56	0.21	19	0.00	73	0.05	61	0.05	80	0.03	60	0.04
Neighaus 1950		50	0.22	38	0.00	41	0.08	43	0.19	78	0.03	43	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.16	89	0.00	59	0.05	62	0.05	58	0.05	51	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		75	0.14	90	0.00	77	0.05	64	0.05	84	0.03	59	0.04
Osinska 1989		13	0.37	9	0.02	24	0.16	20	0.63	46	0.06	23	0.19
Pachmann 1927		78	0.12	64	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.03	75	0.03
Paderewski 1930		85	0.05	50	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.16	46	0.00	70	0.05	65	0.05	83	0.03	54	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.18	63	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.03	71	0.03
Poblocka 1999		40	0.26	67	0.00	37	0.11	35	0.36	75	0.04	34	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		22	0.34	39	0.00	17	0.12	14	0.69	36	0.26	14	0.42
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.24	36	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	80	0.03	50	0.05
Rangell 2001		45	0.24	33	0.00	38	0.10	39	0.28	64	0.04	39	0.11
Richter 1976		80	0.10	77	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02
Rosen 1989		24	0.34	6	0.04	21	0.12	23	0.61	68	0.04	30	0.16
Rosenthal 1930		26	0.34	47	0.00	26	0.16	24	0.58	27	0.50	10	0.54
Rosenthal 1931		4	0.40	15	0.01	5	0.22	3	0.78	6	0.78	1	0.78
Rosenthal 1931b		5	0.40	20	0.00	7	0.22	6	0.76	7	0.75	2	0.75
Rosenthal 1931c		15	0.36	10	0.02	12	0.13	21	0.62	16	0.50	9	0.56
Rosenthal 1931d		16	0.36	34	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.71	10	0.69	4	0.70
Rossi 2007		74	0.14	62	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.26	41	0.00	49	0.06	54	0.06	72	0.03	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		65	0.17	79	0.00	58	0.04	70	0.04	66	0.04	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.36	11	0.02	10	0.10	13	0.70	50	0.07	20	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		53	0.22	48	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	87	0.02	78	0.03
Shebanova 2002		63	0.18	83	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	85	0.03	81	0.03
Smith 1975		20	0.35	12	0.01	8	0.11	12	0.70	27	0.38	11	0.52
Sokolov 2002		48	0.23	58	0.00	52	0.06	55	0.06	83	0.02	69	0.03
Sztompka 1959		71	0.16	56	0.00	66	0.04	75	0.04	84	0.03	76	0.03
Tomsic 1995		38	0.26	16	0.00	27	0.12	32	0.42	65	0.05	32	0.14
Uninsky 1932		58	0.20	32	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	87	0.02	80	0.03
Uninsky 1971		10	0.38	21	0.00	19	0.13	18	0.66	48	0.06	22	0.20
Wasowski 1980		73	0.15	65	0.00	65	0.04	73	0.04	84	0.03	68	0.03
Zak 1937		34	0.29	54	0.00	36	0.11	36	0.36	83	0.04	35	0.12
Zak 1951		32	0.30	55	0.00	34	0.10	34	0.38	72	0.04	36	0.12
Random 1		89	-0.07	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.00	87	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	45	0.08	61	0.04
Random 3		90	-0.11	82	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	54	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).