Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		66	0.34	17	0.01	74	0.04	75	0.04	56	0.05	84	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		54	0.38	55	0.00	32	0.08	29	0.35	17	0.55	29	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		25	0.44	7	0.01	37	0.10	35	0.25	25	0.41	35	0.32
Bacha 2000		39	0.40	52	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	8	0.61	42	0.21
Badura 1965		50	0.38	18	0.01	22	0.07	40	0.17	11	0.52	39	0.30
Barbosa 1983		17	0.46	11	0.01	15	0.09	32	0.33	29	0.33	34	0.33
Biret 1990		85	0.25	86	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.03	89	0.03
Blet 2003		71	0.32	63	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	87	0.03
Block 1995		24	0.44	15	0.01	24	0.09	20	0.49	7	0.65	14	0.56
Blumental 1952		21	0.44	20	0.00	23	0.07	17	0.50	10	0.64	12	0.57
Boshniakovich 1969		3	0.53	3	0.06	3	0.24	4	0.67	6	0.69	4	0.68
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.29	88	0.00	79	0.03	83	0.03	52	0.06	79	0.04
Bunin 1987		16	0.46	25	0.00	28	0.09	22	0.47	2	0.69	13	0.57
Bunin 1987b		19	0.45	34	0.00	29	0.09	26	0.44	2	0.68	15	0.55
Chiu 1999		55	0.38	70	0.00	65	0.05	66	0.05	52	0.05	72	0.05
Cohen 1997		74	0.30	58	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	43	0.20	65	0.08
Cortot 1951		63	0.35	39	0.00	56	0.04	70	0.04	8	0.63	51	0.16
Csalog 1996		72	0.31	89	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	59	0.05	74	0.05
Czerny 1949		41	0.40	64	0.00	21	0.07	28	0.40	16	0.68	20	0.52
Czerny 1990		20	0.45	60	0.00	17	0.10	21	0.49	23	0.56	21	0.52
Duchoud 2007		84	0.26	30	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	46	0.08	69	0.06
Ezaki 2006		12	0.48	6	0.02	7	0.13	8	0.61	3	0.70	6	0.65
Falvay 1989		61	0.35	81	0.00	51	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	73	0.05
Farrell 1958		68	0.34	37	0.00	60	0.05	56	0.05	35	0.16	61	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.24	44	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	40	0.24	64	0.08
Fliere 1977		2	0.53	5	0.02	5	0.19	2	0.68	11	0.59	9	0.63
Fou 1978		32	0.41	72	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	35	0.27	56	0.13
Francois 1956		78	0.27	83	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	51	0.05	86	0.04
Friedman 1923		62	0.35	19	0.00	70	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.06	77	0.05
Friedman 1923b		69	0.33	77	0.00	72	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.05	85	0.04
Friedman 1930		59	0.36	49	0.00	66	0.05	67	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.05
Garcia 2007		56	0.37	50	0.00	34	0.09	31	0.33	7	0.63	26	0.46
Garcia 2007b		36	0.41	35	0.00	35	0.10	30	0.33	12	0.65	28	0.46
Gierzod 1998		4	0.50	2	0.14	2	0.25	3	0.68	2	0.72	2	0.70
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.38	75	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	27	0.44	44	0.21
Groot 1988		37	0.41	32	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.12	42	0.11	59	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		6	0.50	61	0.00	14	0.09	10	0.56	24	0.42	25	0.48
Hatto 1993		22	0.44	51	0.00	25	0.08	14	0.52	19	0.46	24	0.49
Hatto 1997		51	0.38	23	0.00	38	0.10	34	0.29	25	0.34	37	0.31
Horowitz 1949		75	0.30	36	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	55	0.05	81	0.04
Indjic 1988		18	0.45	26	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.54	19	0.54	17	0.54
Kapell 1951		27	0.44	9	0.01	31	0.08	27	0.44	21	0.35	31	0.39
Kissin 1993		7	0.49	27	0.00	8	0.10	9	0.56	9	0.75	7	0.65
Kushner 1989		1	0.56	1	0.51	1	0.51	1	0.74	5	0.71	1	0.72
Luisada 1991		65	0.34	87	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	51	0.06	71	0.05
Lushtak 2004		10	0.49	16	0.01	10	0.09	7	0.62	4	0.69	8	0.65
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1978		11	0.49	14	0.01	6	0.18	6	0.63	2	0.70	5	0.66
Magin 1975		15	0.46	48	0.00	26	0.09	24	0.45	11	0.59	18	0.52
Michalowski 1933		79	0.27	69	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	58	0.06	82	0.04
Milkina 1970		64	0.35	73	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	43	0.14	63	0.08
Mohovich 1999		30	0.42	43	0.00	33	0.09	25	0.45	22	0.48	27	0.46
Moravec 1969		29	0.43	40	0.00	36	0.10	33	0.33	16	0.44	32	0.38
Morozova 2008		14	0.47	45	0.00	13	0.14	15	0.52	6	0.59	16	0.55
Neighaus 1950		73	0.31	90	0.00	78	0.03	87	0.03	66	0.04	90	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		38	0.41	21	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	15	0.46	50	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.42	71	0.00	50	0.05	61	0.05	45	0.08	68	0.06
Osinska 1989		58	0.36	38	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.22	39	0.20	43	0.21
Pachmann 1927		44	0.39	62	0.00	39	0.07	41	0.16	6	0.61	36	0.31
Paderewski 1930		49	0.39	74	0.00	54	0.05	57	0.05	5	0.65	47	0.18
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.40	46	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	23	0.39	53	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		47	0.39	42	0.00	59	0.06	51	0.06	14	0.53	46	0.18
Poblocka 1999		46	0.39	22	0.00	19	0.07	39	0.18	34	0.29	40	0.23
Rabcewiczowa 1932		70	0.32	78	0.00	64	0.05	55	0.05	44	0.11	66	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		60	0.36	31	0.00	62	0.05	68	0.05	42	0.16	60	0.09
Rangell 2001		57	0.37	54	0.00	55	0.05	62	0.05	33	0.38	55	0.14
Richter 1976		8	0.49	13	0.01	11	0.14	13	0.53	15	0.63	10	0.58
Rosen 1989		40	0.40	57	0.00	49	0.05	65	0.05	49	0.05	76	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.26	79	0.00	87	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.29	65	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	24	0.47	54	0.14
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.26	84	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	29	0.42	58	0.13
Rosenthal 1931c		67	0.34	56	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	21	0.47	52	0.15
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.26	82	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	28	0.29	62	0.09
Rossi 2007		86	0.25	59	0.00	69	0.05	63	0.05	9	0.57	49	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.38	41	0.00	41	0.10	38	0.20	18	0.46	38	0.30
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.43	53	0.00	27	0.09	19	0.49	21	0.52	23	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		26	0.44	12	0.01	18	0.07	18	0.50	23	0.38	30	0.44
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.41	24	0.00	20	0.07	36	0.24	6	0.58	33	0.37
Shebanova 2002		9	0.49	8	0.01	16	0.09	12	0.53	18	0.52	19	0.52
Smith 1975		80	0.27	80	0.00	85	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.05	80	0.04
Sokolov 2002		45	0.39	10	0.01	48	0.07	46	0.07	29	0.40	48	0.17
Sztompka 1959		5	0.50	4	0.04	12	0.13	16	0.51	11	0.64	11	0.57
Tomsic 1995		23	0.44	29	0.00	30	0.08	23	0.45	5	0.57	22	0.51
Uninsky 1932		13	0.48	28	0.00	4	0.17	5	0.65	3	0.72	3	0.68
Uninsky 1971		35	0.41	68	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	30	0.35	41	0.22
Wasowski 1980		42	0.40	47	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	80	0.04	78	0.04
Zak 1937		48	0.39	67	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	28	0.30	57	0.13
Zak 1951		33	0.41	33	0.00	47	0.08	45	0.08	18	0.43	45	0.19
Random 1		89	0.00	85	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	26	0.31	70	0.06
Random 2		88	0.04	66	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	39	0.13	83	0.04
Random 3		90	0.00	76	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	6	0.50	67	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).