Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		10	0.37	70	0.00	13	0.20	10	0.72	23	0.43	10	0.56
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.37	20	0.00	11	0.20	11	0.71	33	0.35	12	0.50
Ashkenazy 1981		45	0.23	66	0.00	46	0.07	48	0.07	81	0.03	50	0.05
Bacha 2000		24	0.30	71	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.44	32	0.21	15	0.30
Badura 1965		22	0.31	9	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.56	37	0.15	16	0.29
Barbosa 1983		39	0.25	24	0.00	56	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.02	74	0.03
Biret 1990		76	0.14	60	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	83	0.03	82	0.03
Blet 2003		54	0.20	88	0.00	59	0.05	56	0.05	65	0.04	61	0.04
Block 1995		36	0.25	61	0.00	31	0.08	28	0.42	84	0.03	36	0.11
Blumental 1952		14	0.35	78	0.00	12	0.20	17	0.60	33	0.26	14	0.39
Boshniakovich 1969		68	0.17	51	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	86	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.39	29	0.00	7	0.31	5	0.78	15	0.63	6	0.70
Bunin 1987		64	0.18	72	0.00	77	0.04	61	0.04	74	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		67	0.18	79	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	65	0.04	71	0.03
Chiu 1999		50	0.21	73	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	85	0.02	69	0.03
Cohen 1997		23	0.30	46	0.00	19	0.20	19	0.57	23	0.53	11	0.55
Cortot 1951		34	0.26	48	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	58	0.06	47	0.06
Csalog 1996		69	0.17	26	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.03	75	0.03
Czerny 1949		41	0.24	22	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.27	54	0.05	29	0.12
Czerny 1990		49	0.21	38	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	63	0.05	46	0.06
Duchoud 2007		86	0.08	80	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	89	0.02
Ezaki 2006		6	0.42	25	0.00	6	0.31	8	0.75	25	0.49	7	0.61
Falvay 1989		19	0.32	81	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.53	64	0.05	23	0.16
Farrell 1958		35	0.25	4	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.18	78	0.03	43	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		7	0.40	16	0.00	8	0.20	6	0.78	3	0.78	5	0.78
Fliere 1977		37	0.25	82	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.27	63	0.04	38	0.10
Fou 1978		13	0.35	8	0.00	16	0.14	12	0.69	50	0.06	18	0.20
Francois 1956		74	0.16	85	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.04	65	0.04
Friedman 1923		66	0.18	34	0.00	66	0.04	63	0.04	80	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923b		72	0.17	39	0.00	69	0.04	74	0.04	76	0.04	63	0.04
Friedman 1930		77	0.14	35	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	77	0.03	62	0.04
Garcia 2007		80	0.11	40	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	0.10	89	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		5	0.44	23	0.00	5	0.39	7	0.75	16	0.48	8	0.60
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.25	62	0.00	39	0.08	41	0.19	75	0.03	42	0.08
Groot 1988		44	0.23	41	0.00	21	0.09	23	0.48	80	0.03	31	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		40	0.25	52	0.00	49	0.07	46	0.07	84	0.03	52	0.05
Hatto 1993		32	0.27	90	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.23	73	0.04	40	0.10
Hatto 1997		29	0.28	67	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.36	83	0.03	39	0.10
Horowitz 1949		78	0.14	63	0.00	55	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.05	57	0.04
Indjic 1988		42	0.24	13	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	77	0.04	49	0.05
Kapell 1951		73	0.17	64	0.00	78	0.04	65	0.04	87	0.03	70	0.03
Kissin 1993		63	0.18	56	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	80	0.04	60	0.04
Kushner 1989		21	0.31	14	0.00	25	0.09	31	0.40	71	0.04	28	0.13
Luisada 1991		59	0.19	27	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03	66	0.03
Lushtak 2004		18	0.32	30	0.00	18	0.21	16	0.63	59	0.05	22	0.18
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.29	10	0.00	20	0.10	24	0.47	69	0.04	25	0.14
Magaloff 1978		33	0.26	74	0.00	29	0.07	32	0.39	75	0.03	32	0.11
Magin 1975		57	0.20	28	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	77	0.04	56	0.04
Michalowski 1933		87	0.08	31	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02
Milkina 1970		25	0.29	44	0.00	28	0.07	34	0.37	81	0.03	33	0.11
Mohovich 1999		17	0.33	7	0.00	17	0.17	14	0.68	48	0.06	19	0.20
Moravec 1969		11	0.37	36	0.00	9	0.20	15	0.63	33	0.27	13	0.41
Morozova 2008		16	0.33	57	0.00	27	0.11	22	0.50	73	0.04	26	0.14
Neighaus 1950		65	0.18	53	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	77	0.03	64	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		47	0.22	17	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.44	56	0.05	24	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.21	47	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	85	0.03	59	0.04
Osinska 1989		51	0.21	58	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	85	0.03	68	0.03
Pachmann 1927		79	0.13	32	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.03	87	0.02
Paderewski 1930		81	0.10	65	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		70	0.17	15	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	84	0.03	67	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		82	0.10	83	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.03	86	0.02
Poblocka 1999		46	0.23	49	0.00	41	0.07	40	0.20	85	0.03	41	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		15	0.34	37	0.00	10	0.19	9	0.72	26	0.44	9	0.56
Rachmaninoff 1923		30	0.28	12	0.00	14	0.11	18	0.59	50	0.06	20	0.19
Rangell 2001		56	0.20	18	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.15	80	0.02	51	0.05
Richter 1976		62	0.18	54	0.00	68	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.04	72	0.03
Rosen 1989		26	0.29	11	0.00	36	0.11	33	0.38	84	0.03	37	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.57	5	0.00	4	0.75	4	0.91	3	0.88	4	0.89
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.85	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.71	3	0.02	3	0.89	3	0.97	3	0.95	3	0.96
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.76	2	0.02	2	0.80	2	0.97	2	0.98	2	0.97
Rossi 2007		83	0.10	68	0.00	67	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04	55	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		20	0.32	55	0.00	35	0.10	30	0.40	67	0.04	27	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		48	0.22	69	0.00	54	0.07	49	0.07	81	0.03	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		9	0.38	19	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.69	54	0.07	17	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		53	0.20	75	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	76	0.03
Shebanova 2002		75	0.15	59	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.04	78	0.03
Smith 1975		31	0.28	42	0.00	32	0.12	27	0.44	45	0.08	21	0.19
Sokolov 2002		61	0.19	86	0.00	65	0.05	57	0.05	81	0.03	54	0.04
Sztompka 1959		55	0.20	76	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	83	0.03	58	0.04
Tomsic 1995		43	0.24	87	0.00	33	0.09	36	0.28	70	0.04	34	0.11
Uninsky 1932		58	0.19	21	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	86	0.02	77	0.03
Uninsky 1971		27	0.29	43	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.42	76	0.03	35	0.11
Wasowski 1980		85	0.09	33	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02
Zak 1937		71	0.17	77	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	82	0.04	48	0.05
Zak 1951		60	0.19	6	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.14	69	0.04	44	0.07
Random 1		89	-0.01	84	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	36	0.23	45	0.07
Random 2		88	0.06	50	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	7	0.46	30	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.13	45	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).