Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   22  0.6550  0.0021  0.1014  0.3360  0.0325  0.10
Ashkenazy 1981   30  0.6135  0.0036  0.0734  0.0755  0.0537  0.06
Beliavsky 2004   33  0.6020  0.0119  0.0824  0.2463  0.0331  0.08
BenOr 1989   25  0.6410  0.0230  0.0923  0.2539  0.0716  0.13
Biret 1990   19  0.6618  0.0115  0.1117  0.3030  0.137  0.20
Blet 2003   34  0.6065  0.0035  0.0639  0.0645  0.0634  0.06
Block 1995   60  0.3946  0.0062  0.0644  0.0652  0.0545  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   9  0.7228  0.0022  0.0820  0.2855  0.0422  0.11
Chiu 1999   62  0.3863  0.0061  0.0641  0.0663  0.0439  0.05
Clidat 1994   26  0.6325  0.0041  0.0642  0.0652  0.0543  0.05
Cohen 1997   58  0.4732  0.0034  0.0551  0.0518  0.2719  0.12
Coop 1987   56  0.4821  0.0149  0.0555  0.0561  0.0454  0.04
Cortot 1951   37  0.5747  0.0054  0.0462  0.0461  0.0364  0.03
Czerny 1949   21  0.6536  0.0023  0.0927  0.2161  0.0430  0.09
Czerny 1949b   27  0.6356  0.0031  0.0831  0.1562  0.0333  0.07
Ezaki 2006   52  0.5057  0.0057  0.0546  0.0563  0.0347  0.04
Falvay 1989   59  0.4230  0.0060  0.0554  0.0561  0.0450  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   50  0.5149  0.0033  0.0637  0.0651  0.0542  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   44  0.5645  0.0045  0.0636  0.0663  0.0359  0.04
Fliere 1977   24  0.6453  0.0025  0.0818  0.3060  0.0420  0.11
Fou 1978   38  0.5754  0.0038  0.0735  0.0762  0.0440  0.05
Francois 1956   20  0.6533  0.0020  0.0921  0.2856  0.0423  0.11
Hatto 1997   17  0.6634  0.0011  0.1512  0.4160  0.0414  0.13
Horowitz 1971   11  0.6842  0.0014  0.1016  0.3136  0.0613  0.14
Horowitz 1985   7  0.7543  0.008  0.229  0.4412  0.502  0.47
Indjic 2001   18  0.667  0.0310  0.1211  0.4159  0.0415  0.13
Kapell 1951   47  0.5439  0.0039  0.0550  0.0561  0.0353  0.04
Kiepura 1999   40  0.5623  0.0047  0.0545  0.0558  0.0448  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   51  0.5113  0.0250  0.0552  0.0562  0.0355  0.04
Kissin 1993   45  0.5529  0.0032  0.0732  0.1452  0.0532  0.08
Kitain 1937   61  0.3937  0.0046  0.0643  0.0639  0.0638  0.06
Kushner 1990   4  0.769  0.025  0.253  0.6049  0.0412  0.15
Levy 1951   39  0.5731  0.0027  0.0730  0.1725  0.208  0.18
Luisada 1990   28  0.6314  0.0142  0.0833  0.0856  0.0535  0.06
Lushtak 2004   29  0.6115  0.0129  0.0928  0.2150  0.0526  0.10
Lympany 1968   16  0.6622  0.0128  0.0925  0.2456  0.0424  0.10
Magaloff 1977   43  0.5658  0.0053  0.0458  0.0460  0.0456  0.04
Magaloff 1977b   42  0.5661  0.0052  0.0457  0.0448  0.0646  0.05
Magin 1975   48  0.5362  0.0055  0.0456  0.0450  0.0552  0.04
Milkina 1970   5  0.755  0.066  0.177  0.5546  0.059  0.17
Mohovich 1999   2  0.782  0.154  0.211  0.6431  0.125  0.28
Nadelmann 1956   1  0.801  0.231  0.232  0.6013  0.343  0.45
Ohlsson 1999   55  0.4948  0.0037  0.0638  0.0660  0.0441  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   41  0.5641  0.0044  0.0547  0.0563  0.0357  0.04
Olejniczak 1991   36  0.5852  0.0040  0.0549  0.0558  0.0451  0.04
Osinska 1989   6  0.7517  0.017  0.175  0.5854  0.0411  0.15
Paderewski 1912   31  0.6155  0.0043  0.0548  0.0551  0.0544  0.05
Perahia 1994   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Perlemuter 1986   13  0.6816  0.0117  0.0813  0.3457  0.0417  0.12
Poblocka 1999   46  0.5440  0.0051  0.0459  0.0463  0.0361  0.03
Rangell 2001   49  0.5112  0.0248  0.0553  0.0559  0.0460  0.04
Risler 1920   53  0.4951  0.0058  0.0460  0.0458  0.0449  0.04
Rosen 1989   54  0.4924  0.0059  0.0640  0.0639  0.0636  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   3  0.763  0.113  0.364  0.595  0.591  0.59
Rubinstein 1952   23  0.6426  0.0012  0.1115  0.3263  0.0328  0.10
Rubinstein 1966   10  0.724  0.102  0.196  0.5715  0.354  0.45
Rummel 1943   14  0.6727  0.0018  0.1022  0.2650  0.0427  0.10
Shebanova 2002   32  0.606  0.0316  0.1219  0.3054  0.0518  0.12
Smith 1975   8  0.7411  0.029  0.248  0.5345  0.0510  0.16
Szpilman 1948   15  0.6638  0.0024  0.0826  0.2343  0.0521  0.11
Uninsky 1971   35  0.598  0.0326  0.0829  0.1962  0.0429  0.09
Wasowski 1980   12  0.6819  0.0113  0.1110  0.4327  0.156  0.25
Weissenberg 1971   57  0.4744  0.0056  0.0461  0.0463  0.0362  0.03
Random 1    64  -0.1164  0.0064  0.0264  0.0242  0.0463  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0059  0.0063  0.0363  0.0358  0.0265  0.02
Random 3   65  -0.1360  0.0065  0.0265  0.0229  0.1058  0.04

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).