Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   49  0.7847  0.0045  0.0559  0.0523  0.3446  0.13
Ashkenazy 1981   37  0.827  0.0223  0.0732  0.1227  0.1842  0.15
Beliavsky 2004   44  0.8018  0.0143  0.0640  0.0611  0.4636  0.17
BenOr 1989   1  0.8948  0.009  0.106  0.4622  0.359  0.40
Biret 1990   53  0.7656  0.0055  0.0550  0.0540  0.0663  0.05
Blet 2003   15  0.8611  0.0113  0.1113  0.3710  0.3511  0.36
Block 1995   40  0.8226  0.0044  0.0736  0.0716  0.4038  0.17
Brailowsky 1960   29  0.8438  0.0037  0.0641  0.063  0.6330  0.19
Chiu 1999   38  0.8221  0.0127  0.0631  0.1227  0.2335  0.17
Clidat 1994   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Cohen 1997   62  0.5261  0.0062  0.0646  0.0644  0.0562  0.05
Coop 1987   20  0.8525  0.0111  0.1310  0.4123  0.3012  0.35
Cortot 1951   47  0.7929  0.0049  0.0558  0.057  0.5041  0.16
Czerny 1949   21  0.8510  0.027  0.088  0.4320  0.378  0.40
Czerny 1949b   9  0.8719  0.018  0.102  0.5411  0.492  0.51
Ezaki 2006   7  0.8722  0.0116  0.1114  0.3630  0.1426  0.22
Falvay 1989   34  0.838  0.0220  0.0824  0.2223  0.2822  0.25
Ferenczy 1958   51  0.7714  0.0135  0.0737  0.0713  0.4137  0.17
Fiorentino 1962   26  0.8540  0.0025  0.1018  0.2922  0.2720  0.28
Fliere 1977   2  0.882  0.182  0.274  0.5213  0.404  0.46
Fou 1978   6  0.8720  0.0110  0.117  0.4515  0.446  0.44
Francois 1956   42  0.8152  0.0038  0.0644  0.069  0.4639  0.17
Hatto 1997   56  0.7360  0.0052  0.0548  0.0544  0.0559  0.05
Horowitz 1971   35  0.8333  0.0040  0.0554  0.0512  0.4343  0.15
Horowitz 1985   59  0.6627  0.0060  0.0557  0.0519  0.3545  0.13
Indjic 2001   57  0.7263  0.0053  0.0556  0.0544  0.0561  0.05
Kapell 1951   18  0.855  0.056  0.0812  0.3722  0.2715  0.32
Kiepura 1999   46  0.7946  0.0050  0.0553  0.0531  0.2250  0.10
Kilenyi 1937   25  0.8562  0.0022  0.0723  0.2231  0.1731  0.19
Kissin 1993   11  0.8724  0.013  0.125  0.5028  0.2016  0.32
Kitain 1937   61  0.5555  0.0059  0.0461  0.046  0.5044  0.14
Kushner 1990   14  0.866  0.0315  0.1021  0.279  0.4314  0.34
Levy 1951   45  0.7915  0.0148  0.0835  0.084  0.6127  0.22
Luisada 1990   17  0.8658  0.0029  0.0626  0.1627  0.2529  0.20
Lushtak 2004   3  0.881  0.351  0.341  0.587  0.581  0.58
Lympany 1968   28  0.8451  0.0033  0.0738  0.0713  0.4334  0.17
Magaloff 1977   10  0.8730  0.0030  0.0727  0.1616  0.3325  0.23
Magaloff 1977b   12  0.8644  0.0031  0.0529  0.1320  0.2433  0.18
Magin 1975   43  0.8049  0.0047  0.0643  0.0634  0.0852  0.07
Milkina 1970   30  0.843  0.065  0.0820  0.286  0.5510  0.39
Mohovich 1999   32  0.8357  0.0042  0.0642  0.0638  0.0755  0.06
Nadelmann 1956   50  0.7731  0.0056  0.0645  0.0648  0.0558  0.05
Ohlsson 1999   48  0.7923  0.0151  0.0547  0.0543  0.0557  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   24  0.8539  0.0024  0.0719  0.2822  0.2521  0.26
Olejniczak 1991   23  0.8550  0.0019  0.0717  0.3024  0.2719  0.28
Osinska 1989   16  0.8613  0.0114  0.1011  0.4125  0.1918  0.28
Paderewski 1912   31  0.8432  0.0034  0.0834  0.087  0.4432  0.19
Perahia 1994   60  0.6336  0.0061  0.0552  0.0542  0.0660  0.05
Perlemuter 1986   4  0.884  0.064  0.103  0.538  0.463  0.49
Poblocka 1999   8  0.879  0.0218  0.0715  0.3325  0.2717  0.30
Rangell 2001   27  0.8435  0.0032  0.0630  0.1221  0.3928  0.22
Risler 1920   19  0.8534  0.0026  0.0822  0.2316  0.5013  0.34
Rosen 1989   13  0.8637  0.0017  0.0616  0.322  0.567  0.42
Rubinstein 1939   58  0.7012  0.0158  0.0560  0.0522  0.2649  0.11
Rubinstein 1952   39  0.8259  0.0041  0.0551  0.0520  0.3447  0.13
Rubinstein 1966   54  0.7428  0.0054  0.0555  0.0521  0.2848  0.12
Rummel 1943   52  0.7716  0.0139  0.0549  0.055  0.5440  0.16
Shebanova 2002   41  0.8153  0.0046  0.0639  0.0633  0.0954  0.07
Smith 1975   5  0.8842  0.0012  0.109  0.4212  0.475  0.44
Szpilman 1948   22  0.8543  0.0028  0.0725  0.1821  0.2923  0.23
Uninsky 1971   33  0.8317  0.0121  0.0728  0.1610  0.3324  0.23
Wasowski 1980   55  0.7345  0.0057  0.0462  0.0439  0.0656  0.05
Weissenberg 1971   36  0.8341  0.0036  0.0833  0.0837  0.0951  0.08
Random 1    64  -0.1154  0.0064  0.0364  0.0322  0.1653  0.07
Random 2   63  0.0065  0.0063  0.0363  0.0355  0.0364  0.03
Random 3   65  -0.1964  0.0065  0.0265  0.0262  0.0265  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).