Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   55  0.7255  0.0053  0.0460  0.0453  0.0560  0.04
Ashkenazy 1981   21  0.8818  0.0119  0.1220  0.492  0.6112  0.55
Beliavsky 2004   54  0.7345  0.0056  0.0558  0.0561  0.0358  0.04
BenOr 1989   13  0.9026  0.0014  0.1619  0.5016  0.4520  0.47
Biret 1990   49  0.7622  0.0038  0.0554  0.0528  0.1439  0.08
Blet 2003   33  0.8149  0.0044  0.0836  0.0842  0.0641  0.07
Block 1995   20  0.885  0.0320  0.1322  0.453  0.5916  0.52
Brailowsky 1960   48  0.7630  0.0049  0.0741  0.0739  0.0740  0.07
Chiu 1999   14  0.8914  0.019  0.1615  0.547  0.5313  0.53
Clidat 1994   36  0.8050  0.0034  0.0834  0.0843  0.0642  0.07
Cohen 1997   60  0.5315  0.0161  0.0559  0.0562  0.0463  0.04
Coop 1987   4  0.9311  0.015  0.243  0.6910  0.555  0.62
Cortot 1951   46  0.7839  0.0051  0.0552  0.0543  0.0556  0.05
Czerny 1949   30  0.832  0.116  0.1813  0.5711  0.5015  0.53
Czerny 1949b   26  0.8633  0.0015  0.1516  0.5316  0.4319  0.48
Ezaki 2006   3  0.937  0.023  0.244  0.6310  0.539  0.58
Falvay 1989   6  0.9217  0.017  0.1512  0.589  0.5210  0.55
Ferenczy 1958   47  0.7742  0.0042  0.0835  0.0831  0.1137  0.09
Fiorentino 1962   8  0.9023  0.0018  0.229  0.596  0.597  0.59
Fliere 1977   17  0.888  0.0222  0.1121  0.4635  0.0828  0.19
Fou 1978   16  0.8932  0.0023  0.1824  0.4322  0.3123  0.37
Francois 1956   51  0.7444  0.0055  0.0363  0.0360  0.0364  0.03
Hatto 1997   40  0.7924  0.0039  0.0644  0.0626  0.1835  0.10
Horowitz 1971   50  0.7460  0.0052  0.0743  0.0763  0.0455  0.05
Horowitz 1985   59  0.5458  0.0060  0.0461  0.0445  0.0646  0.05
Indjic 2001   41  0.7947  0.0040  0.0647  0.0626  0.1736  0.10
Kapell 1951   7  0.9219  0.0110  0.225  0.637  0.634  0.63
Kiepura 1999   27  0.866  0.0227  0.1323  0.441  0.6017  0.51
Kilenyi 1937   9  0.9020  0.008  0.1614  0.5411  0.4918  0.51
Kissin 1993   10  0.9034  0.0016  0.156  0.6133  0.1425  0.29
Kitain 1937   62  0.2952  0.0062  0.0556  0.0546  0.0554  0.05
Kushner 1990   44  0.7835  0.0036  0.0649  0.0645  0.0552  0.05
Levy 1951   56  0.7146  0.0050  0.0551  0.0537  0.0647  0.05
Luisada 1990   25  0.879  0.0228  0.1327  0.3730  0.2026  0.27
Lushtak 2004   18  0.8840  0.0026  0.1528  0.3626  0.1727  0.25
Lympany 1968   29  0.8328  0.0031  0.0731  0.1628  0.1829  0.17
Magaloff 1977   23  0.8729  0.0024  0.1326  0.4212  0.3822  0.40
Magaloff 1977b   24  0.8753  0.0025  0.1925  0.4211  0.4021  0.41
Magin 1975   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Milkina 1970   39  0.7913  0.0148  0.0742  0.0756  0.0451  0.05
Mohovich 1999   32  0.8137  0.0030  0.0832  0.1534  0.0932  0.12
Nadelmann 1956   53  0.7325  0.0037  0.0648  0.0647  0.0553  0.05
Ohlsson 1999   15  0.894  0.0411  0.1611  0.591  0.703  0.64
Olejniczac 1990   11  0.9016  0.0117  0.147  0.616  0.576  0.59
Olejniczak 1991   2  0.943  0.082  0.302  0.753  0.732  0.74
Osinska 1989   19  0.8810  0.0221  0.128  0.6031  0.1424  0.29
Paderewski 1912   37  0.8021  0.0043  0.0739  0.0741  0.0645  0.06
Perahia 1994   61  0.5365  0.0059  0.0550  0.0556  0.0462  0.04
Perlemuter 1986   42  0.7861  0.0029  0.0829  0.1836  0.0733  0.11
Poblocka 1999   1  0.941  0.501  0.491  0.765  0.731  0.74
Rangell 2001   5  0.9331  0.004  0.1810  0.596  0.598  0.59
Risler 1920   43  0.7856  0.0033  0.0645  0.0624  0.3431  0.14
Rosen 1989   38  0.8054  0.0047  0.0933  0.0937  0.0643  0.07
Rubinstein 1939   58  0.6257  0.0058  0.0557  0.0553  0.0549  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   45  0.7838  0.0045  0.0738  0.0747  0.0457  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   52  0.7351  0.0054  0.0555  0.0557  0.0459  0.04
Rummel 1943   57  0.6543  0.0057  0.0553  0.0563  0.0361  0.04
Shebanova 2002   12  0.9012  0.0113  0.1417  0.535  0.5811  0.55
Smith 1975   31  0.8264  0.0041  0.0646  0.0643  0.0548  0.05
Szpilman 1948   35  0.8041  0.0035  0.0740  0.0751  0.0544  0.06
Uninsky 1971   28  0.8448  0.0032  0.0830  0.1641  0.0634  0.10
Wasowski 1980   34  0.8036  0.0046  0.0837  0.0813  0.3630  0.17
Weissenberg 1971   22  0.8827  0.0012  0.1418  0.5112  0.5514  0.53
Random 1    64  -0.0659  0.0064  0.0264  0.0226  0.1250  0.05
Random 2   63  0.0863  0.0063  0.0462  0.0425  0.1638  0.08
Random 3   65  -0.1862  0.0065  0.0265  0.0252  0.0365  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).