Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ashkenazy 1981   12  0.8118  0.0119  0.1415  0.4921  0.2710  0.36
Beliavsky 2004   22  0.7833  0.0015  0.1317  0.476  0.514  0.49
BenOr 1989   18  0.7916  0.0124  0.1020  0.4059  0.0431  0.13
Biret 1990   20  0.7827  0.0042  0.0644  0.0639  0.0647  0.06
Blet 2003   11  0.8214  0.028  0.1313  0.5014  0.269  0.36
Block 1995   56  0.6754  0.0054  0.0363  0.0351  0.0562  0.04
Brailowsky 1960   40  0.7456  0.0056  0.0456  0.0452  0.0557  0.04
Chiu 1999   54  0.7041  0.0047  0.0548  0.0556  0.0551  0.05
Clidat 1994   23  0.7845  0.0022  0.1023  0.3459  0.0528  0.13
Cohen 1997   51  0.7157  0.0049  0.0550  0.052  0.6124  0.17
Coop 1987   50  0.7123  0.0146  0.0936  0.0950  0.0543  0.07
Cortot 1951   45  0.7242  0.0057  0.0361  0.0358  0.0465  0.03
Czerny 1949   47  0.7239  0.0027  0.0927  0.2157  0.0436  0.09
Czerny 1949b   25  0.7724  0.0013  0.126  0.5540  0.0623  0.18
Ezaki 2006   31  0.7613  0.0237  0.1133  0.1159  0.0440  0.07
Falvay 1989   48  0.7243  0.0050  0.0552  0.0558  0.0552  0.05
Ferenczy 1958   36  0.7644  0.0039  0.0642  0.0648  0.0555  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   30  0.7650  0.0033  0.1134  0.1150  0.0639  0.08
Fliere 1977   9  0.8221  0.019  0.107  0.5433  0.0918  0.22
Fou 1978   35  0.7619  0.0136  0.1135  0.1158  0.0542  0.07
Francois 1956   42  0.7435  0.0020  0.1224  0.3011  0.4311  0.36
Hatto 1997   4  0.8348  0.0014  0.1411  0.527  0.475  0.49
Horowitz 1971   2  0.844  0.073  0.145  0.575  0.561  0.56
Horowitz 1985   43  0.7417  0.0134  0.0739  0.077  0.5820  0.20
Indjic 2001   3  0.8331  0.0011  0.1210  0.537  0.483  0.50
Kapell 1951   39  0.7440  0.0038  0.0837  0.0855  0.0545  0.06
Kiepura 1999   38  0.7555  0.0045  0.0740  0.0734  0.0741  0.07
Kilenyi 1937   41  0.7426  0.0026  0.1025  0.3039  0.0826  0.15
Kissin 1993   10  0.8211  0.0210  0.113  0.6146  0.0621  0.19
Kitain 1937   62  0.3622  0.0161  0.0457  0.0413  0.4130  0.13
Kushner 1990   19  0.799  0.037  0.1118  0.4319  0.2215  0.31
Levy 1951   58  0.6636  0.0060  0.0359  0.0341  0.0559  0.04
Luisada 1990   32  0.7646  0.0028  0.0830  0.1850  0.0538  0.09
Lushtak 2004   17  0.7962  0.0021  0.1719  0.4158  0.0429  0.13
Lympany 1968   26  0.7749  0.0044  0.0641  0.0646  0.0548  0.05
Magaloff 1977   5  0.838  0.0416  0.119  0.5329  0.2112  0.33
Magaloff 1977b   6  0.8315  0.0117  0.1212  0.5225  0.2013  0.32
Magin 1975   46  0.7252  0.0051  0.0553  0.0560  0.0460  0.04
Milkina 1970   8  0.8320  0.0118  0.1214  0.5017  0.357  0.42
Mohovich 1999   34  0.7632  0.0029  0.1128  0.2053  0.0534  0.10
Nadelmann 1956   33  0.763  0.086  0.1026  0.2318  0.3216  0.27
Ohlsson 1999   53  0.7037  0.0048  0.0549  0.0547  0.0554  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   29  0.7758  0.0032  0.0832  0.1554  0.0537  0.09
Olejniczak 1991   28  0.7764  0.0043  0.0645  0.0661  0.0453  0.05
Osinska 1989   1  0.851  0.221  0.211  0.7332  0.1314  0.31
Paderewski 1912   14  0.805  0.065  0.1016  0.4816  0.338  0.40
Perahia 1994   60  0.6551  0.0055  0.0360  0.0314  0.3333  0.10
Perlemuter 1986   21  0.7812  0.0212  0.098  0.5456  0.0425  0.15
Poblocka 1999   49  0.7147  0.0052  0.0547  0.0553  0.0550  0.05
Rangell 2001   55  0.7061  0.0053  0.0358  0.0363  0.0364  0.03
Risler 1920   59  0.6553  0.0062  0.0546  0.0560  0.0458  0.04
Rosen 1989   37  0.7528  0.0040  0.0643  0.0635  0.0646  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   44  0.737  0.0530  0.0831  0.1615  0.3617  0.24
Rubinstein 1952   27  0.7729  0.0035  0.0738  0.0745  0.0456  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   16  0.8030  0.0031  0.1129  0.2024  0.2519  0.22
Rummel 1943   61  0.5838  0.0059  0.0362  0.0349  0.0463  0.03
Shebanova 2002   15  0.8010  0.0223  0.1021  0.3839  0.0627  0.15
Smith 1975   13  0.816  0.054  0.104  0.6016  0.386  0.48
Szpilman 1948   7  0.832  0.182  0.192  0.6317  0.392  0.50
Uninsky 1971   24  0.7765  0.0025  0.0922  0.3633  0.1022  0.19
Wasowski 1980   52  0.7025  0.0041  0.0551  0.0535  0.0649  0.05
Weissenberg 1971   57  0.6734  0.0058  0.0455  0.0459  0.0461  0.04
Random 1    64  -0.0359  0.0064  0.0264  0.025  0.4235  0.09
Random 2   63  0.1663  0.0063  0.0454  0.0417  0.2332  0.10
Random 3   65  -0.0560  0.0065  0.0265  0.0213  0.2344  0.07

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).