Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   57  0.5814  0.0147  0.0449  0.0462  0.0362  0.03
Ashkenazy 1981   25  0.7034  0.0037  0.0454  0.0462  0.0457  0.04
Beliavsky 2004   46  0.6560  0.0048  0.0456  0.0450  0.0447  0.04
BenOr 1989   20  0.7245  0.0028  0.0822  0.2357  0.0522  0.11
Biret 1990   51  0.6146  0.0044  0.0447  0.0458  0.0459  0.04
Blet 2003   32  0.695  0.057  0.1913  0.4041  0.0612  0.15
Block 1995   59  0.5622  0.0060  0.0360  0.0361  0.0463  0.03
Brailowsky 1960   3  0.791  0.341  0.331  0.645  0.551  0.59
Chiu 1999   60  0.5542  0.0061  0.0539  0.0552  0.0537  0.05
Clidat 1994   10  0.773  0.105  0.145  0.5449  0.059  0.16
Cohen 1997   62  0.3550  0.0062  0.0636  0.0656  0.0441  0.05
Coop 1987   49  0.6528  0.0032  0.0632  0.1158  0.0435  0.07
Cortot 1951   45  0.6551  0.0050  0.0637  0.0654  0.0442  0.05
Czerny 1949   1  0.816  0.053  0.193  0.5850  0.057  0.17
Czerny 1949b   2  0.7930  0.0012  0.097  0.4549  0.0511  0.15
Ezaki 2006   31  0.698  0.0216  0.0827  0.1744  0.0720  0.11
Falvay 1989   50  0.6226  0.0051  0.0359  0.0353  0.0545  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   61  0.5056  0.0049  0.0448  0.0463  0.0361  0.03
Fiorentino 1962   29  0.6962  0.0045  0.0540  0.0559  0.0458  0.04
Fliere 1977   15  0.7515  0.0114  0.1111  0.4159  0.0414  0.13
Fou 1978   14  0.762  0.126  0.154  0.5732  0.125  0.26
Francois 1956   7  0.7818  0.0115  0.0817  0.2739  0.0617  0.13
Hatto 1997   55  0.5858  0.0056  0.0455  0.0454  0.0548  0.04
Horowitz 1971   30  0.699  0.0218  0.0818  0.2542  0.0619  0.12
Horowitz 1985   35  0.6855  0.0041  0.0452  0.0421  0.3321  0.11
Indjic 2001   56  0.5861  0.0057  0.0541  0.0556  0.0455  0.04
Kapell 1951   37  0.6816  0.0126  0.0623  0.2154  0.0524  0.10
Kiepura 1999   48  0.6537  0.0052  0.0362  0.0343  0.0643  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   24  0.7029  0.0030  0.0726  0.1758  0.0432  0.08
Kissin 1993   47  0.6520  0.0127  0.0924  0.2056  0.0525  0.10
Kitain 1937   54  0.5910  0.0222  0.0825  0.174  0.574  0.31
Kushner 1990   5  0.797  0.044  0.216  0.5044  0.058  0.16
Levy 1951   33  0.6823  0.0011  0.1315  0.3122  0.333  0.32
Luisada 1990   16  0.7513  0.0134  0.0634  0.0663  0.0353  0.04
Lushtak 2004   19  0.7264  0.0024  0.0619  0.2539  0.0618  0.12
Lympany 1968   23  0.7041  0.0017  0.0716  0.2762  0.0327  0.09
Magaloff 1977   42  0.6657  0.0054  0.0446  0.0458  0.0450  0.04
Magaloff 1977b   43  0.6643  0.0055  0.0542  0.0558  0.0456  0.04
Magin 1975   44  0.6517  0.0153  0.0363  0.0353  0.0546  0.04
Milkina 1970   12  0.7611  0.018  0.1510  0.4225  0.156  0.25
Mohovich 1999   13  0.7653  0.0020  0.0820  0.2461  0.0333  0.08
Nadelmann 1956   4  0.794  0.082  0.142  0.5817  0.322  0.43
Ohlsson 1999   58  0.5712  0.0158  0.0358  0.0363  0.0360  0.03
Olejniczac 1990   27  0.7054  0.0043  0.0445  0.0458  0.0451  0.04
Olejniczak 1991   38  0.6749  0.0046  0.0443  0.0449  0.0638  0.05
Osinska 1989   8  0.7833  0.009  0.169  0.4356  0.0415  0.13
Paderewski 1912   22  0.7132  0.0038  0.0453  0.0456  0.0452  0.04
Perahia 1994   41  0.6735  0.0040  0.0450  0.0422  0.2626  0.10
Perlemuter 1986   6  0.7825  0.0013  0.1112  0.4061  0.0416  0.13
Poblocka 1999   26  0.7039  0.0033  0.0833  0.0862  0.0336  0.05
Rangell 2001   40  0.6763  0.0031  0.0531  0.1147  0.0634  0.08
Risler 1920   28  0.7021  0.0129  0.0729  0.1644  0.0528  0.09
Rosen 1989   34  0.6836  0.0036  0.0444  0.0448  0.0554  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   39  0.6747  0.0042  0.0635  0.0630  0.1329  0.09
Rubinstein 1952   9  0.7719  0.0110  0.218  0.4536  0.0513  0.15
Rubinstein 1966   36  0.6844  0.0025  0.0630  0.1546  0.0431  0.08
Rummel 1943   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Shebanova 2002   53  0.5965  0.0059  0.0357  0.0344  0.0549  0.04
Smith 1975   11  0.7740  0.0019  0.0914  0.3636  0.0610  0.15
Szpilman 1948   21  0.7224  0.0021  0.0721  0.2357  0.0423  0.10
Uninsky 1971   17  0.7327  0.0023  0.0828  0.1756  0.0530  0.09
Wasowski 1980   18  0.7352  0.0039  0.0451  0.0442  0.0544  0.04
Weissenberg 1971   52  0.6031  0.0035  0.0638  0.0658  0.0439  0.05
Random 1    64  -0.1638  0.0064  0.0264  0.0263  0.0264  0.02
Random 2   63  -0.0859  0.0063  0.0361  0.0360  0.0265  0.02
Random 3   65  -0.2248  0.0065  0.0265  0.0227  0.1440  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).