Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   53  0.7027  0.0038  0.0635  0.0651  0.0547  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   6  0.816  0.064  0.158  0.4833  0.094  0.21
Beliavsky 2004   29  0.7539  0.0049  0.0547  0.0543  0.0543  0.05
BenOr 1989   11  0.8047  0.0011  0.1611  0.4355  0.0516  0.15
Biret 1990   50  0.7134  0.0022  0.0721  0.2453  0.0425  0.10
Blet 2003   44  0.7353  0.0050  0.0454  0.0463  0.0364  0.03
Block 1995   58  0.6635  0.0059  0.0640  0.0659  0.0448  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   34  0.7560  0.0044  0.0549  0.0553  0.0540  0.05
Chiu 1999   52  0.7012  0.0225  0.0825  0.1853  0.0526  0.09
Clidat 1994   43  0.7322  0.0036  0.0639  0.0662  0.0446  0.05
Cohen 1997   61  0.5252  0.0061  0.0458  0.0433  0.0837  0.06
Coop 1987   46  0.7255  0.0046  0.0551  0.0552  0.0544  0.05
Cortot 1951   32  0.7549  0.0052  0.0633  0.0631  0.1235  0.08
Czerny 1949   28  0.7536  0.0028  0.0630  0.1349  0.0532  0.08
Czerny 1949b   12  0.7946  0.0016  0.1012  0.3760  0.0419  0.12
Ezaki 2006   18  0.775  0.0718  0.0917  0.3038  0.0912  0.16
Falvay 1989   48  0.7163  0.0055  0.0460  0.0459  0.0456  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   60  0.6259  0.0056  0.0461  0.0457  0.0460  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   22  0.7656  0.0037  0.0543  0.0552  0.0550  0.05
Fliere 1977   3  0.822  0.113  0.212  0.5754  0.057  0.17
Fou 1978   9  0.8020  0.0112  0.1110  0.4352  0.0514  0.15
Francois 1956   23  0.7628  0.0051  0.0546  0.0550  0.0553  0.05
Hatto 1997   40  0.7314  0.0213  0.0816  0.3047  0.0520  0.12
Horowitz 1971   33  0.7533  0.0020  0.0820  0.2748  0.0522  0.12
Horowitz 1985   54  0.6942  0.0053  0.0455  0.0420  0.3518  0.12
Indjic 2001   41  0.7316  0.0114  0.1018  0.2949  0.0521  0.12
Kapell 1951   38  0.7343  0.0045  0.0456  0.0450  0.0558  0.04
Kiepura 1999   15  0.7932  0.0039  0.0634  0.0651  0.0539  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   42  0.7348  0.0043  0.0544  0.0554  0.0545  0.05
Kissin 1993   31  0.7525  0.0024  0.0923  0.2059  0.0428  0.09
Kitain 1937   62  0.4338  0.0062  0.0637  0.0642  0.0638  0.06
Kushner 1990   26  0.7619  0.0121  0.0715  0.3560  0.0323  0.10
Levy 1951   55  0.6929  0.0048  0.0452  0.0438  0.0642  0.05
Luisada 1990   14  0.7921  0.0131  0.0631  0.1249  0.0534  0.08
Lushtak 2004   2  0.837  0.045  0.153  0.5655  0.0415  0.15
Lympany 1968   25  0.7662  0.0030  0.0829  0.1554  0.0429  0.08
Magaloff 1977   8  0.8115  0.0110  0.145  0.5042  0.076  0.19
Magaloff 1977b   7  0.8123  0.009  0.117  0.5045  0.0611  0.17
Magin 1975   10  0.8011  0.0215  0.0913  0.3637  0.089  0.17
Milkina 1970   4  0.818  0.046  0.126  0.5049  0.0513  0.16
Mohovich 1999   24  0.7658  0.0042  0.0541  0.0556  0.0463  0.04
Nadelmann 1956   30  0.7531  0.0027  0.0728  0.1556  0.0431  0.08
Ohlsson 1999   47  0.7141  0.0035  0.0545  0.0554  0.0459  0.04
Olejniczac 1990   21  0.7640  0.0032  0.0632  0.1249  0.0533  0.08
Olejniczak 1991   20  0.7745  0.0029  0.0726  0.1655  0.0527  0.09
Osinska 1989   1  0.843  0.102  0.141  0.6149  0.058  0.17
Paderewski 1912   37  0.7418  0.0147  0.0550  0.0562  0.0361  0.04
Perahia 1994   56  0.689  0.0319  0.0827  0.1510  0.432  0.25
Perlemuter 1986   36  0.7410  0.0226  0.0724  0.1950  0.0524  0.10
Poblocka 1999   19  0.7730  0.0033  0.0638  0.0655  0.0441  0.05
Rangell 2001   27  0.7651  0.0034  0.0636  0.0651  0.0551  0.05
Risler 1920   59  0.6254  0.0060  0.0363  0.0353  0.0555  0.04
Rosen 1989   51  0.7126  0.0057  0.0362  0.0363  0.0465  0.03
Rubinstein 1939   49  0.714  0.098  0.1222  0.2119  0.331  0.26
Rubinstein 1952   35  0.7424  0.0041  0.0548  0.0539  0.0552  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   17  0.7717  0.0117  0.1014  0.3530  0.153  0.23
Rummel 1943   45  0.7357  0.0054  0.0542  0.0551  0.0462  0.04
Shebanova 2002   13  0.791  0.211  0.204  0.5548  0.0510  0.17
Smith 1975   16  0.7837  0.0023  0.0819  0.2938  0.0617  0.13
Szpilman 1948   39  0.7344  0.0040  0.0453  0.0461  0.0454  0.04
Uninsky 1971   5  0.8113  0.027  0.139  0.4634  0.085  0.19
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Weissenberg 1971   57  0.6750  0.0058  0.0459  0.0450  0.0557  0.04
Random 1    64  -0.1164  0.0064  0.0264  0.0212  0.3430  0.08
Random 2   63  0.0265  0.0063  0.0457  0.0429  0.1336  0.07
Random 3   65  -0.2161  0.0065  0.0265  0.0228  0.1149  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).