Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   43  0.7748  0.0040  0.0445  0.0438  0.0752  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   10  0.849  0.0218  0.1023  0.2725  0.2317  0.25
Beliavsky 2004   52  0.7449  0.0058  0.0361  0.0347  0.0559  0.04
BenOr 1989   16  0.8355  0.0020  0.0618  0.3536  0.0823  0.17
Biret 1990   21  0.8210  0.0212  0.108  0.446  0.554  0.49
Blet 2003   30  0.8021  0.0016  0.1217  0.3520  0.2116  0.27
Block 1995   55  0.7219  0.0059  0.0450  0.0450  0.0653  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   38  0.7911  0.0127  0.0628  0.1915  0.4114  0.28
Chiu 1999   56  0.7244  0.0056  0.0360  0.0347  0.0657  0.04
Clidat 1994   22  0.8231  0.0019  0.0720  0.3451  0.0531  0.13
Cohen 1997   61  0.6120  0.0037  0.0537  0.059  0.5324  0.16
Coop 1987   27  0.8114  0.0117  0.1314  0.3839  0.0821  0.17
Cortot 1951   53  0.7360  0.0049  0.0454  0.0418  0.3234  0.11
Czerny 1949   36  0.7952  0.0029  0.0729  0.1739  0.0640  0.10
Czerny 1949b   33  0.8054  0.0038  0.0542  0.0538  0.0744  0.06
Ezaki 2006   23  0.8115  0.0130  0.0825  0.2132  0.1027  0.14
Falvay 1989   44  0.7640  0.0048  0.0457  0.0456  0.0558  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   59  0.7041  0.0032  0.0632  0.1132  0.1038  0.10
Fiorentino 1962   13  0.8462  0.0023  0.0916  0.3637  0.0822  0.17
Fliere 1977   11  0.8435  0.0026  0.0626  0.2055  0.0535  0.10
Fou 1978   7  0.8512  0.017  0.136  0.4726  0.2310  0.33
Francois 1956   45  0.7638  0.0046  0.0451  0.0440  0.0654  0.05
Hatto 1997   58  0.7264  0.0051  0.0455  0.0450  0.0560  0.04
Horowitz 1971   17  0.835  0.0314  0.0919  0.349  0.477  0.40
Horowitz 1985   54  0.7350  0.0061  0.0535  0.0517  0.4028  0.14
Indjic 2001   57  0.7251  0.0050  0.0453  0.0452  0.0562  0.04
Kapell 1951   25  0.8145  0.0021  0.0924  0.2746  0.0629  0.13
Kiepura 1999   39  0.7846  0.0054  0.0458  0.0446  0.0555  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   29  0.8023  0.0031  0.0730  0.1649  0.0639  0.10
Kissin 1993   6  0.853  0.083  0.204  0.5730  0.1712  0.31
Kitain 1937   62  0.5826  0.0062  0.0534  0.0511  0.4426  0.15
Kushner 1990   3  0.8717  0.005  0.233  0.5813  0.336  0.44
Levy 1951   49  0.7561  0.0036  0.0541  0.0526  0.1937  0.10
Luisada 1990   18  0.8356  0.0024  0.0822  0.2744  0.0632  0.13
Lushtak 2004   8  0.8529  0.009  0.109  0.4438  0.0819  0.19
Lympany 1968   20  0.824  0.066  0.167  0.4710  0.455  0.46
Magaloff 1977   35  0.7942  0.0052  0.0456  0.0444  0.0651  0.05
Magaloff 1977b   37  0.7937  0.0053  0.0362  0.0351  0.0563  0.04
Magin 1975   40  0.7839  0.0047  0.0447  0.0438  0.0749  0.05
Milkina 1970   15  0.838  0.0215  0.1215  0.3715  0.398  0.38
Mohovich 1999   5  0.8513  0.014  0.245  0.567  0.492  0.52
Nadelmann 1956   31  0.8057  0.0033  0.0633  0.0623  0.2633  0.12
Ohlsson 1999   48  0.7522  0.0042  0.0449  0.0430  0.1243  0.07
Olejniczac 1990   12  0.8434  0.0022  0.0913  0.3935  0.0820  0.18
Olejniczak 1991   9  0.8418  0.0013  0.1210  0.4330  0.1913  0.29
Osinska 1989   1  0.881  0.371  0.372  0.6814  0.373  0.50
Paderewski 1912   34  0.8033  0.0035  0.0538  0.0531  0.1542  0.09
Perahia 1994   60  0.6424  0.0057  0.0363  0.0315  0.3241  0.10
Perlemuter 1986   19  0.8343  0.0011  0.1312  0.3930  0.1518  0.24
Poblocka 1999   28  0.8036  0.0034  0.0540  0.0549  0.0648  0.05
Rangell 2001   41  0.7859  0.0043  0.0452  0.0452  0.0564  0.04
Risler 1920   46  0.7647  0.0055  0.0459  0.0457  0.0556  0.04
Rosen 1989   14  0.846  0.0310  0.0921  0.3317  0.3211  0.32
Rubinstein 1939   26  0.817  0.0325  0.0631  0.147  0.5615  0.28
Rubinstein 1952   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Rubinstein 1966   2  0.872  0.212  0.271  0.711  0.751  0.73
Rummel 1943   42  0.7732  0.0039  0.0536  0.058  0.4525  0.15
Shebanova 2002   32  0.8016  0.0145  0.0543  0.0557  0.0461  0.04
Smith 1975   4  0.8628  0.008  0.1411  0.4020  0.299  0.34
Szpilman 1948   24  0.8127  0.0028  0.0727  0.2042  0.0536  0.10
Uninsky 1971   47  0.7525  0.0041  0.0544  0.0543  0.0650  0.05
Wasowski 1980   51  0.7430  0.0060  0.0539  0.0548  0.0547  0.05
Weissenberg 1971   50  0.7558  0.0044  0.0446  0.0438  0.0945  0.06
Random 1    65  -0.1353  0.0065  0.0265  0.0261  0.0265  0.02
Random 2   63  0.1463  0.0063  0.0448  0.042  0.4530  0.13
Random 3   64  -0.1165  0.0064  0.0264  0.0225  0.1646  0.06

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).