Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   47  0.7711  0.0036  0.0640  0.066  0.5535  0.18
Ashkenazy 1981   24  0.855  0.0119  0.0915  0.433  0.5611  0.49
Beliavsky 2004   17  0.8736  0.0038  0.0641  0.064  0.5334  0.18
BenOr 1989   10  0.8853  0.008  0.188  0.5414  0.499  0.51
Biret 1990   56  0.6960  0.0054  0.0552  0.0538  0.0663  0.05
Blet 2003   37  0.8146  0.0027  0.1024  0.316  0.4124  0.36
Block 1995   50  0.7538  0.0049  0.0551  0.0529  0.2150  0.10
Brailowsky 1960   38  0.8056  0.0048  0.0545  0.0513  0.4439  0.15
Chiu 1999   40  0.8022  0.0026  0.0828  0.2524  0.3228  0.28
Clidat 1994   15  0.8730  0.0018  0.1011  0.492  0.548  0.51
Cohen 1997   62  0.4427  0.0062  0.0644  0.0649  0.0562  0.05
Coop 1987   32  0.8352  0.0021  0.1126  0.2929  0.2232  0.25
Cortot 1951   54  0.7423  0.0057  0.0548  0.0524  0.2251  0.10
Czerny 1949   1  0.971  0.911  0.891  0.961  0.961  0.96
Czerny 1949b   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ezaki 2006   11  0.8824  0.007  0.186  0.5817  0.4110  0.49
Falvay 1989   33  0.8249  0.0028  0.0825  0.3022  0.3126  0.30
Ferenczy 1958   58  0.6961  0.0043  0.0456  0.0445  0.0661  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   13  0.8717  0.0014  0.0814  0.448  0.5116  0.47
Fliere 1977   3  0.904  0.014  0.173  0.614  0.564  0.58
Fou 1978   23  0.8516  0.0031  0.1327  0.2717  0.4025  0.33
Francois 1956   27  0.8534  0.0047  0.0550  0.0513  0.4143  0.14
Hatto 1997   51  0.7557  0.0035  0.0739  0.0711  0.3837  0.16
Horowitz 1971   49  0.7625  0.0045  0.0554  0.0524  0.2349  0.11
Horowitz 1985   59  0.6535  0.0059  0.0363  0.0325  0.2252  0.08
Indjic 2001   52  0.7543  0.0037  0.0736  0.0712  0.3738  0.16
Kapell 1951   25  0.8550  0.0015  0.0823  0.3716  0.4422  0.40
Kiepura 1999   31  0.8339  0.0046  0.0459  0.0426  0.3348  0.11
Kilenyi 1937   8  0.8810  0.003  0.235  0.588  0.536  0.55
Kissin 1993   28  0.848  0.002  0.179  0.5416  0.3619  0.44
Kitain 1937   61  0.5221  0.0061  0.0555  0.0524  0.2847  0.12
Kushner 1990   35  0.8231  0.0033  0.1033  0.1026  0.1644  0.13
Levy 1951   53  0.7432  0.0052  0.0457  0.0412  0.5041  0.14
Luisada 1990   4  0.8933  0.0016  0.1010  0.523  0.567  0.54
Lushtak 2004   26  0.8540  0.0030  0.1030  0.2522  0.3031  0.27
Lympany 1968   36  0.8147  0.0042  0.0737  0.0727  0.2045  0.12
Magaloff 1977   19  0.8654  0.0024  0.1118  0.409  0.4720  0.43
Magaloff 1977b   21  0.8644  0.0025  0.1420  0.3910  0.4421  0.41
Magin 1975   18  0.8615  0.0013  0.0816  0.4316  0.5312  0.48
Milkina 1970   34  0.8214  0.0044  0.0553  0.0527  0.1354  0.08
Mohovich 1999   16  0.8726  0.0022  0.0829  0.2516  0.3727  0.30
Nadelmann 1956   45  0.7819  0.0034  0.1034  0.105  0.4533  0.21
Ohlsson 1999   48  0.7759  0.0040  0.0642  0.0620  0.3542  0.14
Olejniczac 1990   12  0.8762  0.0010  0.1112  0.478  0.5014  0.48
Olejniczak 1991   22  0.8645  0.0020  0.0921  0.3817  0.4023  0.39
Osinska 1989   5  0.892  0.016  0.202  0.734  0.632  0.68
Paderewski 1912   20  0.863  0.019  0.1022  0.372  0.6015  0.47
Perahia 1994   60  0.6365  0.0060  0.0362  0.0331  0.1555  0.07
Perlemuter 1986   2  0.9042  0.0011  0.0813  0.477  0.4617  0.46
Poblocka 1999   6  0.897  0.0112  0.087  0.5614  0.585  0.57
Rangell 2001   29  0.8429  0.0029  0.0831  0.2324  0.3430  0.28
Risler 1920   39  0.8012  0.0039  0.0643  0.0615  0.5036  0.17
Rosen 1989   44  0.7928  0.0053  0.0458  0.0433  0.0856  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   57  0.6913  0.0058  0.0546  0.0551  0.0558  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   41  0.8051  0.0050  0.0738  0.0742  0.0557  0.06
Rubinstein 1966   55  0.7437  0.0056  0.0547  0.0540  0.0560  0.05
Rummel 1943   42  0.7920  0.0055  0.0549  0.057  0.4540  0.15
Shebanova 2002   30  0.849  0.0032  0.1132  0.2116  0.3829  0.28
Smith 1975   14  0.8755  0.0023  0.1219  0.4011  0.4918  0.44
Szpilman 1948   9  0.8818  0.005  0.204  0.592  0.633  0.61
Uninsky 1971   7  0.896  0.0117  0.0917  0.422  0.5513  0.48
Wasowski 1980   43  0.7941  0.0051  0.0460  0.0412  0.3746  0.12
Weissenberg 1971   46  0.7764  0.0041  0.0735  0.0740  0.0953  0.08
Random 1    64  -0.1148  0.0064  0.0264  0.0230  0.1159  0.05
Random 2   63  -0.0263  0.0063  0.0461  0.0440  0.0464  0.04
Random 3   65  -0.1958  0.0065  0.0265  0.0245  0.0465  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).