Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   28  0.809  0.0222  0.0716  0.3316  0.484  0.40
Ashkenazy 1981   33  0.7914  0.0135  0.0736  0.0737  0.0742  0.07
Beliavsky 2004   14  0.8418  0.0119  0.0719  0.307  0.505  0.39
BenOr 1989   17  0.8359  0.0018  0.1015  0.3447  0.0528  0.13
Biret 1990   49  0.7321  0.0151  0.0454  0.0448  0.0561  0.04
Blet 2003   40  0.7662  0.0042  0.0452  0.0451  0.0558  0.04
Block 1995   45  0.7435  0.0049  0.0546  0.0546  0.0653  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   48  0.7361  0.0055  0.0360  0.0361  0.0363  0.03
Chiu 1999   41  0.7612  0.0217  0.0830  0.2039  0.0826  0.13
Clidat 1994   15  0.8433  0.009  0.097  0.4434  0.0818  0.19
Cohen 1997   61  0.4937  0.0062  0.0644  0.0627  0.1436  0.09
Coop 1987   29  0.8024  0.0011  0.1220  0.2943  0.0723  0.14
Cortot 1951   53  0.7013  0.0158  0.0549  0.0559  0.0462  0.04
Czerny 1949   1  0.872  0.143  0.221  0.6119  0.381  0.48
Czerny 1949b   2  0.864  0.122  0.152  0.6022  0.372  0.47
Ezaki 2006   20  0.8222  0.0129  0.0924  0.2741  0.0821  0.15
Falvay 1989   34  0.7910  0.0212  0.1021  0.2933  0.1217  0.19
Ferenczy 1958   58  0.6647  0.0045  0.0639  0.0629  0.1239  0.08
Fiorentino 1962   6  0.8563  0.0013  0.109  0.4031  0.1215  0.22
Fliere 1977   8  0.8511  0.027  0.143  0.5532  0.1311  0.27
Fou 1978   22  0.8125  0.0027  0.0825  0.2743  0.0627  0.13
Francois 1956   37  0.7849  0.0043  0.0642  0.0631  0.1634  0.10
Hatto 1997   55  0.6957  0.0046  0.0734  0.0730  0.1431  0.10
Horowitz 1971   27  0.806  0.0415  0.0913  0.3715  0.388  0.37
Horowitz 1985   59  0.6653  0.0060  0.0455  0.0428  0.1935  0.09
Indjic 2001   57  0.6965  0.0047  0.0833  0.0829  0.1332  0.10
Kapell 1951   35  0.7843  0.0036  0.0638  0.0640  0.0745  0.06
Kiepura 1999   7  0.857  0.046  0.1310  0.3910  0.483  0.43
Kilenyi 1937   24  0.8055  0.0016  0.0917  0.3338  0.0820  0.16
Kissin 1993   23  0.811  0.211  0.206  0.4532  0.1512  0.26
Kitain 1937   62  0.4828  0.0059  0.0363  0.0319  0.3533  0.10
Kushner 1990   36  0.7864  0.0023  0.0732  0.1446  0.0538  0.08
Levy 1951   54  0.7048  0.0056  0.0459  0.0463  0.0364  0.03
Luisada 1990   11  0.8450  0.0025  0.0922  0.2836  0.0724  0.14
Lushtak 2004   21  0.8138  0.0028  0.0923  0.2851  0.0529  0.12
Lympany 1968   32  0.7952  0.0033  0.0637  0.0650  0.0548  0.05
Magaloff 1977   18  0.8240  0.0030  0.1326  0.2731  0.1516  0.20
Magaloff 1977b   19  0.8230  0.0031  0.1029  0.2334  0.0925  0.14
Magin 1975   30  0.8029  0.0037  0.0641  0.0639  0.0743  0.06
Milkina 1970   39  0.7654  0.0040  0.0548  0.0558  0.0457  0.04
Mohovich 1999   12  0.8458  0.0021  0.0728  0.2445  0.0630  0.12
Nadelmann 1956   52  0.7116  0.0150  0.0453  0.0436  0.0650  0.05
Ohlsson 1999   44  0.7432  0.0039  0.0643  0.0638  0.0646  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   4  0.8641  0.008  0.118  0.4130  0.1414  0.24
Olejniczak 1991   9  0.8517  0.0124  0.0818  0.3133  0.1119  0.18
Osinska 1989   13  0.8427  0.0020  0.0712  0.3745  0.0522  0.14
Paderewski 1912   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Perahia 1994   60  0.6123  0.0161  0.0551  0.0548  0.0554  0.05
Perlemuter 1986   3  0.8615  0.014  0.164  0.5125  0.277  0.37
Poblocka 1999   25  0.8036  0.0034  0.0640  0.0637  0.0841  0.07
Rangell 2001   43  0.7551  0.0048  0.0547  0.0556  0.0460  0.04
Risler 1920   47  0.7344  0.0053  0.0361  0.0336  0.0656  0.04
Rosen 1989   26  0.805  0.1010  0.0914  0.3618  0.319  0.33
Rubinstein 1939   56  0.698  0.0352  0.0457  0.0447  0.0649  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   31  0.8020  0.0132  0.0831  0.1538  0.0537  0.09
Rubinstein 1966   50  0.7226  0.0041  0.0550  0.0539  0.0551  0.05
Rummel 1943   51  0.7134  0.0057  0.0456  0.0453  0.0459  0.04
Shebanova 2002   38  0.7739  0.0038  0.0645  0.0647  0.0552  0.05
Smith 1975   10  0.843  0.125  0.155  0.4619  0.316  0.38
Szpilman 1948   5  0.8546  0.0014  0.1111  0.3824  0.2410  0.30
Uninsky 1971   16  0.8331  0.0026  0.0927  0.2622  0.2213  0.24
Wasowski 1980   46  0.7419  0.0154  0.0362  0.0350  0.0555  0.04
Weissenberg 1971   42  0.7556  0.0044  0.0735  0.0747  0.0644  0.06
Random 1    65  -0.1645  0.0065  0.0265  0.0249  0.0365  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0660  0.0063  0.0458  0.0422  0.1840  0.08
Random 3   64  -0.1142  0.0064  0.0264  0.0221  0.1847  0.06

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).