Nadelmann 1956

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   20  0.7221  0.0025  0.0831  0.1611  0.3719  0.24
Ashkenazy 1981   15  0.723  0.106  0.159  0.4535  0.1022  0.21
Beliavsky 2004   28  0.6934  0.0012  0.0826  0.2031  0.1726  0.18
BenOr 1989   1  0.791  0.341  0.331  0.7717  0.511  0.63
Biret 1990   11  0.7416  0.0114  0.0713  0.4143  0.0629  0.16
Blet 2003   6  0.7411  0.0110  0.1411  0.429  0.498  0.45
Block 1995   42  0.6625  0.0035  0.0638  0.0648  0.0561  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   35  0.6743  0.0043  0.0645  0.0627  0.2336  0.12
Chiu 1999   25  0.7018  0.0123  0.0925  0.2340  0.0733  0.13
Clidat 1994   32  0.6830  0.0041  0.0737  0.0726  0.2139  0.12
Cohen 1997   23  0.7035  0.0046  0.0547  0.0531  0.1247  0.08
Coop 1987   52  0.6265  0.0057  0.0455  0.0457  0.0562  0.04
Cortot 1951   26  0.6951  0.0037  0.0736  0.0730  0.1443  0.10
Czerny 1949   36  0.6755  0.0042  0.0639  0.0633  0.1245  0.08
Czerny 1949b   45  0.6633  0.0029  0.0528  0.1926  0.3017  0.24
Ezaki 2006   17  0.7256  0.0026  0.1030  0.1736  0.0935  0.12
Falvay 1989   12  0.7313  0.0116  0.0616  0.3830  0.1516  0.24
Ferenczy 1958   56  0.5860  0.0060  0.0453  0.0443  0.0564  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   3  0.784  0.083  0.303  0.6618  0.492  0.57
Fliere 1977   7  0.7427  0.008  0.185  0.5913  0.523  0.55
Fou 1978   22  0.702  0.175  0.178  0.5125  0.299  0.38
Francois 1956   61  0.526  0.0362  0.0644  0.0618  0.4530  0.16
Hatto 1997   30  0.6820  0.0033  0.0643  0.0626  0.2338  0.12
Horowitz 1971   51  0.6228  0.0048  0.0451  0.0430  0.1548  0.08
Horowitz 1985   59  0.5539  0.0055  0.0452  0.0439  0.0753  0.05
Indjic 2001   18  0.7238  0.0027  0.0823  0.2524  0.2615  0.25
Kapell 1951   5  0.755  0.072  0.202  0.7117  0.394  0.53
Kiepura 1999   43  0.6615  0.0150  0.0457  0.0432  0.1349  0.07
Kilenyi 1937   39  0.6745  0.0034  0.0640  0.0639  0.0950  0.07
Kissin 1993   50  0.6263  0.0040  0.0735  0.0761  0.0457  0.05
Kitain 1937   60  0.5352  0.0056  0.0449  0.0413  0.4434  0.13
Kushner 1990   49  0.6346  0.0044  0.0641  0.0625  0.2537  0.12
Levy 1951   29  0.6936  0.0021  0.0822  0.2637  0.0832  0.14
Luisada 1990   8  0.747  0.0213  0.0719  0.3428  0.2911  0.31
Lushtak 2004   44  0.6647  0.0052  0.0362  0.0336  0.0760  0.05
Lympany 1968   27  0.6957  0.0038  0.0933  0.0911  0.5121  0.21
Magaloff 1977   31  0.6829  0.0024  0.1118  0.3633  0.1024  0.19
Magaloff 1977b   41  0.6637  0.0032  0.0732  0.1444  0.0644  0.09
Magin 1975   4  0.7614  0.0111  0.1210  0.4321  0.507  0.46
Milkina 1970   33  0.6817  0.0149  0.0454  0.0435  0.0756  0.05
Mohovich 1999   10  0.7426  0.007  0.147  0.5219  0.426  0.47
Nadelmann 1956   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ohlsson 1999   55  0.5953  0.0058  0.0458  0.0448  0.0563  0.04
Olejniczac 1990   2  0.7910  0.024  0.394  0.6623  0.365  0.49
Olejniczak 1991   14  0.7341  0.0017  0.0714  0.4031  0.2112  0.29
Osinska 1989   13  0.7344  0.0019  0.0815  0.3938  0.0825  0.18
Paderewski 1912   58  0.5524  0.0054  0.0456  0.0443  0.0659  0.05
Perahia 1994   54  0.6042  0.0059  0.0361  0.0356  0.0465  0.03
Perlemuter 1986   47  0.6312  0.0151  0.0360  0.0319  0.3840  0.11
Poblocka 1999   16  0.7240  0.0018  0.0812  0.4136  0.0923  0.19
Rangell 2001   19  0.729  0.0222  0.0820  0.3335  0.0828  0.16
Risler 1920   62  0.5059  0.0061  0.0450  0.0434  0.0951  0.06
Rosen 1989   46  0.6423  0.0053  0.0459  0.0421  0.3041  0.11
Rubinstein 1939   37  0.6731  0.0028  0.0624  0.245  0.5710  0.37
Rubinstein 1952   40  0.6722  0.0030  0.0727  0.2024  0.2720  0.23
Rubinstein 1966   38  0.678  0.0231  0.0829  0.1820  0.3218  0.24
Rummel 1943   53  0.6254  0.0039  0.0934  0.0915  0.3627  0.18
Shebanova 2002   48  0.6350  0.0045  0.0546  0.0547  0.0558  0.05
Smith 1975   34  0.6749  0.0036  0.0642  0.0649  0.0555  0.05
Szpilman 1948   57  0.5762  0.0047  0.0448  0.0441  0.0654  0.05
Uninsky 1971   21  0.7032  0.0015  0.0617  0.3728  0.2213  0.29
Wasowski 1980   24  0.7048  0.0020  0.0721  0.3140  0.0731  0.15
Weissenberg 1971   9  0.7419  0.009  0.146  0.5332  0.1414  0.27
Random 1    63  0.0364  0.0063  0.0263  0.0212  0.4842  0.10
Random 2   65  -0.0158  0.0064  0.0264  0.0222  0.1952  0.06
Random 3   64  0.0061  0.0065  0.0265  0.0215  0.3346  0.08

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).