Horowitz 1985

Performance	0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001	24	0.57	18	0.00	23	0.09	20	0.28	25	0.22	8	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981	3	0.62	19	0.00	4	0.16	2	0.52	47	0.06	9	0.18
Beliavsky 2004	55	0.50	41	0.00	47	0.05	53	0.05	41	0.06	47	0.05
BenOr 1989	12	0.60	36	0.00	20	0.08	8	0.43	59	0.04	18	0.13
Biret 1990	15	0.59	60	0.00	19	0.08	17	0.34	61	0.04	22	0.12
Blet 2003	22	0.57	35	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.21	57	0.05	27	0.10
Block 1995	21	0.58	9	0.01	10	0.08	24	0.25	41	0.05	23	0.11
Brailowsky 1960	19	0.58	38	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.13	39	0.07	25	0.10
Chiu 1999	44	0.54	54	0.00	42	0.09	34	0.09	54	0.05	35	0.07
Clidat 1994	45	0.53	22	0.00	39	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.04	53	0.05
Cohen 1997	60	0.43	65	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	50	0.04	64	0.03
Coop 1987	49	0.51	61	0.00	48	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.05	48	0.05
Cortot 1951	16	0.58	52	0.00	25	0.06	25	0.22	53	0.04	33	0.09
Czerny 1949	46	0.52	62	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.06
Czerny 1949b	30	0.56	3	0.04	3	0.14	10	0.41	28	0.25	4	0.32
Ezaki 2006	50	0.51	45	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04
Falvay 1989	33	0.56	48	0.00	43	0.09	33	0.09	60	0.04	38	0.06
Ferenczy 1958	32	0.56	16	0.00	8	0.08	16	0.35	21	0.28	6	0.31
Fiorentino 1962	34	0.56	63	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.13	54	0.05	34	0.08
Fliere 1977	5	0.62	5	0.02	7	0.09	9	0.42	31	0.16	7	0.26
Fou 1978	40	0.55	50	0.00	36	0.07	43	0.07	46	0.06	39	0.06
Francois 1956	62	0.38	47	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.06
Hatto 1997	51	0.51	44	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Horowitz 1971	1	0.76	1	0.73	1	0.72	1	0.85	1	0.81	1	0.83
Horowitz 1985	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Indjic 2001	54	0.50	28	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	49	0.05	55	0.05
Kapell 1951	26	0.56	10	0.01	28	0.07	27	0.19	58	0.05	26	0.10
Kiepura 1999	2	0.63	2	0.04	2	0.27	6	0.43	17	0.39	2	0.41
Kilenyi 1937	4	0.62	57	0.00	5	0.11	11	0.39	49	0.06	13	0.15
Kissin 1993	9	0.61	15	0.00	17	0.11	7	0.43	53	0.05	12	0.15
Kitain 1937	27	0.56	20	0.00	13	0.08	18	0.31	11	0.48	3	0.39
Kushner 1990	57	0.49	49	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	62	0.03	60	0.04
Levy 1951	8	0.61	6	0.01	6	0.10	3	0.51	52	0.05	10	0.16
Luisada 1990	47	0.52	58	0.00	55	0.06	49	0.06	59	0.05	54	0.05
Lushtak 2004	28	0.56	12	0.01	29	0.07	29	0.14	42	0.06	31	0.09
Lympany 1968	58	0.47	13	0.01	56	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.04	58	0.04
Magaloff 1977	11	0.61	30	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.35	57	0.05	17	0.13
Magaloff 1977b	10	0.61	24	0.00	15	0.11	12	0.39	56	0.05	14	0.14
Magin 1975	7	0.62	25	0.00	11	0.09	19	0.31	49	0.05	20	0.12
Milkina 1970	48	0.52	59	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	47	0.05	46	0.05
Mohovich 1999	53	0.50	55	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	44	0.05	62	0.04
Nadelmann 1956	41	0.55	40	0.00	33	0.07	39	0.07	52	0.04	50	0.05
Ohlsson 1999	29	0.56	31	0.00	37	0.07	40	0.07	38	0.07	36	0.07
Olejniczac 1990	23	0.57	17	0.00	26	0.07	23	0.26	58	0.04	28	0.10
Olejniczak 1991	31	0.56	34	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.13	47	0.06	29	0.09
Osinska 1989	36	0.55	4	0.02	35	0.07	41	0.07	61	0.04	44	0.05
Paderewski 1912	37	0.55	26	0.00	38	0.08	35	0.08	56	0.04	41	0.06
Perahia 1994	25	0.57	14	0.01	24	0.09	28	0.17	50	0.05	32	0.09
Perlemuter 1986	56	0.50	51	0.00	58	0.06	46	0.06	58	0.04	49	0.05
Poblocka 1999	39	0.55	21	0.00	44	0.07	36	0.07	54	0.05	37	0.06
Rangell 2001	52	0.50	56	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	61	0.04	63	0.04
Risler 1920	61	0.41	46	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04
Rosen 1989	42	0.54	29	0.00	45	0.07	44	0.07	44	0.06	42	0.06
Rubinstein 1939	17	0.58	7	0.01	9	0.11	15	0.35	21	0.27	5	0.31
Rubinstein 1952	38	0.55	23	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.07	59	0.04	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1966	43	0.54	33	0.00	46	0.07	37	0.07	57	0.04	51	0.05
Rummel 1943	18	0.58	37	0.00	14	0.09	22	0.26	52	0.05	24	0.11
Shebanova 2002	59	0.44	43	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05
Smith 1975	14	0.60	11	0.01	18	0.10	4	0.45	52	0.04	16	0.13
Szpilman 1948	20	0.58	32	0.00	22	0.11	13	0.36	54	0.05	15	0.13
Uninsky 1971	6	0.62	8	0.01	12	0.09	5	0.45	42	0.06	11	0.16
Wasowski 1980	13	0.60	39	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.28	55	0.05	19	0.12
Weissenberg 1971	35	0.55	42	0.00	34	0.07	38	0.07	63	0.03	45	0.05
Random 1	65	-0.03	53	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	52	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2	63	0.04	64	0.00	63	0.03	62	0.03	13	0.28	30	0.09
Random 3	64	0.04	27	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	7	0.50	21	0.12

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

Performance:
0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

red = strongly similar performance to target
orange = moderately similar performance
yellow = weakly similar performance
green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
white = dissimilar to target
blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).