Levy 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.68	22	0.01	41	0.05	51	0.05	20	0.29	46	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.80	20	0.01	11	0.17	8	0.59	14	0.50	15	0.54
Beliavsky 2004		28	0.73	18	0.01	30	0.09	29	0.21	2	0.55	26	0.34
BenOr 1989		16	0.76	28	0.00	18	0.09	14	0.48	22	0.41	18	0.44
Biret 1990		5	0.79	2	0.17	2	0.17	5	0.67	16	0.48	11	0.57
Blet 2003		43	0.67	21	0.01	52	0.06	42	0.06	27	0.19	48	0.11
Block 1995		19	0.76	24	0.00	27	0.09	30	0.21	13	0.42	30	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.66	43	0.00	51	0.05	56	0.05	28	0.23	47	0.11
Chiu 1999		27	0.73	33	0.00	29	0.08	28	0.22	27	0.38	31	0.29
Clidat 1994		47	0.66	56	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	28	0.16	49	0.10
Cohen 1997		58	0.60	54	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.04	64	0.04
Coop 1987		8	0.78	4	0.08	7	0.13	9	0.56	15	0.52	14	0.54
Cortot 1951		15	0.76	34	0.00	16	0.09	13	0.50	2	0.64	12	0.57
Czerny 1949		31	0.72	55	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.17	19	0.37	32	0.25
Czerny 1949b		20	0.75	12	0.01	10	0.13	20	0.46	2	0.72	9	0.58
Ezaki 2006		29	0.73	39	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.28	26	0.32	28	0.30
Falvay 1989		23	0.75	30	0.00	26	0.10	25	0.35	22	0.40	24	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.66	16	0.01	46	0.05	46	0.05	9	0.49	39	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.76	44	0.00	21	0.12	15	0.48	21	0.41	17	0.44
Fliere 1977		1	0.81	1	0.25	1	0.25	1	0.69	3	0.76	1	0.72
Fou 1978		7	0.78	3	0.12	3	0.17	2	0.68	2	0.67	2	0.67
Francois 1956		62	0.51	17	0.01	61	0.04	57	0.04	13	0.52	42	0.14
Hatto 1997		12	0.78	8	0.03	9	0.12	21	0.45	3	0.71	10	0.57
Horowitz 1971		53	0.63	48	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	34	0.08	57	0.06
Horowitz 1985		55	0.61	26	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	3	0.51	38	0.16
Indjic 2001		9	0.78	31	0.00	8	0.12	10	0.55	2	0.70	5	0.62
Kapell 1951		14	0.76	19	0.01	19	0.11	17	0.47	24	0.34	21	0.40
Kiepura 1999		56	0.61	59	0.00	60	0.05	53	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		26	0.74	29	0.00	23	0.10	24	0.38	25	0.46	20	0.42
Kissin 1993		22	0.75	45	0.00	20	0.11	18	0.46	21	0.34	22	0.40
Kitain 1937		61	0.52	51	0.00	62	0.06	44	0.06	42	0.06	56	0.06
Kushner 1990		60	0.59	62	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	41	0.06	61	0.05
Levy 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1990		32	0.72	50	0.00	33	0.09	35	0.09	25	0.35	35	0.18
Lushtak 2004		39	0.69	27	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.06	14	0.42	40	0.16
Lympany 1968		59	0.60	63	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.04	63	0.04
Magaloff 1977		10	0.78	11	0.02	12	0.24	6	0.66	7	0.60	4	0.63
Magaloff 1977b		13	0.77	14	0.01	13	0.20	7	0.63	7	0.59	6	0.61
Magin 1975		40	0.68	58	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.06	31	0.26	43	0.12
Milkina 1970		42	0.68	36	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.05
Mohovich 1999		35	0.70	61	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.07	34	0.06	55	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		37	0.69	46	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.08	22	0.26	41	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.72	32	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.16	4	0.58	29	0.30
Olejniczac 1990		21	0.75	52	0.00	22	0.14	19	0.46	29	0.31	23	0.38
Olejniczak 1991		36	0.69	47	0.00	35	0.16	33	0.16	29	0.30	33	0.22
Osinska 1989		18	0.76	25	0.00	24	0.14	22	0.43	25	0.29	25	0.35
Paderewski 1912		33	0.71	10	0.02	14	0.13	23	0.38	3	0.63	16	0.49
Perahia 1994		57	0.60	53	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	34	0.06	62	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		51	0.65	23	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	20	0.38	44	0.12
Poblocka 1999		6	0.79	9	0.02	4	0.17	4	0.67	16	0.51	8	0.58
Rangell 2001		34	0.70	57	0.00	34	0.11	34	0.11	28	0.29	36	0.18
Risler 1920		50	0.66	38	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	1	0.56	34	0.21
Rosen 1989		52	0.65	41	0.00	56	0.05	50	0.05	27	0.20	50	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		45	0.67	15	0.01	47	0.07	40	0.07	11	0.40	37	0.17
Rubinstein 1952		44	0.67	35	0.00	50	0.07	39	0.07	46	0.05	58	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.66	49	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	31	0.16	51	0.09
Rummel 1943		54	0.62	13	0.01	39	0.05	49	0.05	28	0.18	53	0.09
Shebanova 2002		38	0.69	40	0.00	40	0.05	54	0.05	18	0.30	45	0.12
Smith 1975		2	0.80	5	0.08	5	0.25	3	0.68	3	0.65	3	0.66
Szpilman 1948		24	0.75	42	0.00	15	0.14	12	0.51	5	0.59	13	0.55
Uninsky 1971		25	0.74	7	0.03	25	0.11	26	0.31	22	0.36	27	0.33
Wasowski 1980		4	0.79	6	0.04	6	0.25	11	0.55	6	0.64	7	0.59
Weissenberg 1971		11	0.78	37	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.47	22	0.38	19	0.42
Random 1		65	-0.03	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	36	0.05	65	0.03
Random 2		63	0.03	65	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	15	0.26	52	0.09
Random 3		64	0.01	60	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	13	0.43	54	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).