BenOr 1989

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   25  0.7814  0.0134  0.0835  0.081  0.7633  0.25
Ashkenazy 1981   12  0.8113  0.0114  0.1213  0.5512  0.5316  0.54
Beliavsky 2004   47  0.7162  0.0048  0.0455  0.0421  0.2759  0.10
BenOr 1989   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Biret 1990   7  0.829  0.0210  0.1112  0.5615  0.5119  0.53
Blet 2003   32  0.7621  0.0032  0.0932  0.183  0.6829  0.35
Block 1995   11  0.8110  0.0215  0.1119  0.461  0.5920  0.52
Brailowsky 1960   40  0.7556  0.0038  0.0740  0.072  0.6637  0.21
Chiu 1999   38  0.7533  0.0025  0.1325  0.384  0.5822  0.47
Clidat 1994   44  0.7365  0.0049  0.0739  0.0711  0.4540  0.18
Cohen 1997   37  0.7553  0.0043  0.0649  0.061  0.6538  0.20
Coop 1987   34  0.7654  0.0031  0.0931  0.2028  0.3932  0.28
Cortot 1951   31  0.7643  0.0036  0.0933  0.099  0.5335  0.22
Czerny 1949   42  0.7464  0.0040  0.0550  0.0522  0.2954  0.12
Czerny 1949b   45  0.7257  0.0047  0.0643  0.0623  0.3450  0.14
Ezaki 2006   18  0.8025  0.0029  0.1028  0.2824  0.4230  0.34
Falvay 1989   16  0.8015  0.0121  0.1420  0.453  0.6317  0.53
Ferenczy 1958   49  0.7127  0.0057  0.0457  0.0413  0.4153  0.13
Fiorentino 1962   9  0.8138  0.003  0.172  0.723  0.752  0.73
Fliere 1977   13  0.818  0.0219  0.1615  0.544  0.729  0.62
Fou 1978   27  0.7732  0.0022  0.0923  0.398  0.5323  0.45
Francois 1956   62  0.5418  0.0162  0.0645  0.0619  0.4347  0.16
Hatto 1997   43  0.7345  0.0050  0.0737  0.0717  0.3543  0.16
Horowitz 1971   52  0.6934  0.0044  0.0553  0.058  0.4649  0.15
Horowitz 1985   59  0.6044  0.0058  0.0459  0.048  0.4352  0.13
Indjic 2001   30  0.7737  0.0041  0.0642  0.0617  0.4145  0.16
Kapell 1951   8  0.813  0.067  0.227  0.591  0.6111  0.60
Kiepura 1999   26  0.7822  0.0037  0.0738  0.074  0.6436  0.21
Kilenyi 1937   24  0.7930  0.0012  0.1210  0.575  0.6810  0.62
Kissin 1993   17  0.8011  0.0211  0.1514  0.559  0.6113  0.58
Kitain 1937   61  0.5449  0.0061  0.0648  0.0614  0.4346  0.16
Kushner 1990   56  0.6641  0.0055  0.0361  0.0316  0.4258  0.11
Levy 1951   33  0.7623  0.0020  0.1222  0.4114  0.4824  0.44
Luisada 1990   21  0.7935  0.0030  0.1427  0.2917  0.5028  0.38
Lushtak 2004   48  0.7120  0.0151  0.0647  0.0613  0.4544  0.16
Lympany 1968   39  0.7529  0.0033  0.0834  0.083  0.7134  0.24
Magaloff 1977   6  0.824  0.065  0.264  0.713  0.733  0.72
Magaloff 1977b   10  0.816  0.044  0.155  0.693  0.724  0.70
Magin 1975   14  0.8050  0.0027  0.1026  0.327  0.6025  0.44
Milkina 1970   29  0.7719  0.0142  0.0741  0.0715  0.3742  0.16
Mohovich 1999   1  0.845  0.059  0.158  0.581  0.777  0.67
Nadelmann 1956   20  0.7939  0.0018  0.1217  0.511  0.778  0.63
Ohlsson 1999   51  0.7152  0.0045  0.0554  0.0527  0.2557  0.11
Olejniczac 1990   4  0.831  0.331  0.321  0.743  0.741  0.74
Olejniczak 1991   15  0.8031  0.0017  0.1416  0.5211  0.5715  0.54
Osinska 1989   5  0.8326  0.0013  0.1411  0.5710  0.5912  0.58
Paderewski 1912   57  0.6636  0.0046  0.0552  0.0522  0.3751  0.14
Perahia 1994   55  0.6828  0.0054  0.0360  0.0313  0.3461  0.10
Perlemuter 1986   54  0.6848  0.0060  0.0551  0.0512  0.4748  0.15
Poblocka 1999   2  0.8412  0.028  0.159  0.5810  0.5514  0.56
Rangell 2001   23  0.7955  0.0016  0.1218  0.4910  0.5818  0.53
Risler 1920   60  0.6059  0.0053  0.0458  0.0424  0.3156  0.11
Rosen 1989   53  0.6840  0.0056  0.0362  0.0312  0.4655  0.12
Rubinstein 1939   58  0.6446  0.0059  0.0456  0.0430  0.1462  0.07
Rubinstein 1952   28  0.7717  0.0128  0.0930  0.215  0.5431  0.34
Rubinstein 1966   41  0.7524  0.0039  0.0644  0.0610  0.4641  0.17
Rummel 1943   36  0.7547  0.0024  0.1029  0.261  0.6327  0.40
Shebanova 2002   50  0.7142  0.0052  0.0646  0.0627  0.1660  0.10
Smith 1975   35  0.7616  0.0126  0.1324  0.3915  0.4126  0.40
Szpilman 1948   46  0.7160  0.0035  0.0836  0.0818  0.4539  0.19
Uninsky 1971   22  0.797  0.046  0.166  0.621  0.756  0.68
Wasowski 1980   19  0.8051  0.0023  0.1221  0.4510  0.5521  0.50
Weissenberg 1971   3  0.832  0.192  0.203  0.723  0.645  0.68
Random 1    64  -0.0263  0.0064  0.0264  0.0234  0.0663  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0058  0.0063  0.0363  0.0342  0.0464  0.03
Random 3   65  -0.0361  0.0065  0.0265  0.0244  0.0565  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).