Kapell 1951

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   49  0.6540  0.0052  0.0550  0.0538  0.0657  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   10  0.7933  0.0017  0.0915  0.4019  0.4617  0.43
Beliavsky 2004   43  0.6949  0.0039  0.0554  0.0525  0.2548  0.11
BenOr 1989   6  0.817  0.055  0.171  0.617  0.593  0.60
Biret 1990   1  0.841  0.171  0.172  0.599  0.614  0.60
Blet 2003   40  0.7043  0.0048  0.0835  0.0821  0.2444  0.14
Block 1995   34  0.7265  0.0046  0.0642  0.0631  0.1352  0.09
Brailowsky 1960   51  0.6431  0.0054  0.0552  0.0543  0.0754  0.06
Chiu 1999   14  0.7826  0.0020  0.0823  0.3422  0.4527  0.39
Clidat 1994   32  0.7352  0.0040  0.0836  0.086  0.5034  0.20
Cohen 1997   54  0.6459  0.0055  0.0460  0.0453  0.0463  0.04
Coop 1987   9  0.8054  0.0015  0.0821  0.3818  0.5016  0.44
Cortot 1951   17  0.7822  0.0026  0.0828  0.273  0.6026  0.40
Czerny 1949   38  0.7024  0.0032  0.0931  0.1818  0.3931  0.26
Czerny 1949b   44  0.6941  0.0033  0.1133  0.1117  0.4532  0.22
Ezaki 2006   7  0.8115  0.027  0.168  0.4912  0.558  0.52
Falvay 1989   22  0.776  0.0531  0.1129  0.2518  0.4430  0.33
Ferenczy 1958   61  0.5455  0.0059  0.0461  0.0450  0.0461  0.04
Fiorentino 1962   23  0.7763  0.0014  0.0816  0.3920  0.4322  0.41
Fliere 1977   33  0.7356  0.0041  0.0838  0.0843  0.0653  0.07
Fou 1978   24  0.7758  0.0025  0.1519  0.3815  0.4420  0.41
Francois 1956   62  0.4221  0.0062  0.0646  0.0651  0.0560  0.05
Hatto 1997   29  0.7523  0.0035  0.0643  0.068  0.5638  0.18
Horowitz 1971   53  0.6428  0.0047  0.0644  0.0627  0.1949  0.11
Horowitz 1985   58  0.5630  0.0053  0.0558  0.0527  0.1950  0.10
Indjic 2001   21  0.7713  0.0230  0.1130  0.2410  0.5128  0.35
Kapell 1951   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Kiepura 1999   52  0.6457  0.0056  0.0459  0.0433  0.0755  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   27  0.7642  0.0023  0.0820  0.3824  0.4618  0.42
Kissin 1993   13  0.7938  0.0016  0.0822  0.3715  0.4325  0.40
Kitain 1937   60  0.5519  0.0157  0.0556  0.0517  0.4146  0.14
Kushner 1990   46  0.6745  0.0050  0.0837  0.0811  0.5133  0.20
Levy 1951   25  0.7617  0.0124  0.1024  0.3417  0.4724  0.40
Luisada 1990   4  0.834  0.094  0.179  0.493  0.695  0.58
Lushtak 2004   48  0.6650  0.0051  0.0553  0.0531  0.1551  0.09
Lympany 1968   39  0.7048  0.0043  0.0647  0.064  0.6235  0.19
Magaloff 1977   15  0.7836  0.0018  0.0811  0.4520  0.4613  0.45
Magaloff 1977b   19  0.7860  0.0021  0.0814  0.4120  0.4419  0.42
Magin 1975   20  0.7711  0.0312  0.1418  0.3923  0.5015  0.44
Milkina 1970   37  0.7116  0.0213  0.0932  0.1216  0.2837  0.18
Mohovich 1999   26  0.768  0.0329  0.1025  0.3011  0.5621  0.41
Nadelmann 1956   28  0.7525  0.0022  0.0817  0.392  0.717  0.53
Ohlsson 1999   36  0.7151  0.0038  0.0557  0.0517  0.3743  0.14
Olejniczac 1990   11  0.7944  0.0011  0.1910  0.4719  0.4612  0.46
Olejniczak 1991   18  0.785  0.0810  0.186  0.5017  0.529  0.51
Osinska 1989   12  0.7927  0.0019  0.0713  0.4218  0.4614  0.44
Paderewski 1912   45  0.6735  0.0042  0.0555  0.0521  0.3945  0.14
Perahia 1994   59  0.5637  0.0058  0.0362  0.0344  0.0562  0.04
Perlemuter 1986   57  0.5714  0.0261  0.0648  0.0651  0.0556  0.05
Poblocka 1999   5  0.8229  0.006  0.147  0.4920  0.4810  0.48
Rangell 2001   2  0.842  0.132  0.203  0.575  0.671  0.62
Risler 1920   47  0.6634  0.0034  0.0739  0.079  0.5036  0.19
Rosen 1989   56  0.5953  0.0060  0.0551  0.0539  0.0658  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   55  0.6318  0.0145  0.0645  0.0615  0.3741  0.15
Rubinstein 1952   35  0.7246  0.0037  0.0740  0.0718  0.3640  0.16
Rubinstein 1966   41  0.709  0.0336  0.0641  0.0614  0.4339  0.16
Rummel 1943   50  0.6520  0.0044  0.0549  0.0516  0.3547  0.13
Shebanova 2002   42  0.7047  0.0049  0.0934  0.0922  0.2442  0.15
Smith 1975   16  0.783  0.119  0.1812  0.449  0.5311  0.48
Szpilman 1948   30  0.7539  0.0027  0.0826  0.2910  0.5523  0.40
Uninsky 1971   31  0.7432  0.0028  0.0927  0.2817  0.4229  0.34
Wasowski 1980   8  0.8110  0.038  0.154  0.563  0.662  0.61
Weissenberg 1971   3  0.8312  0.033  0.185  0.5513  0.536  0.54
Random 1    65  -0.0464  0.0065  0.0265  0.0247  0.0464  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0261  0.0063  0.0263  0.0252  0.0365  0.02
Random 3   64  -0.0162  0.0064  0.0264  0.0231  0.1159  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).