Luisada 1990

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   45  0.6737  0.0050  0.0556  0.0557  0.0363  0.04
Ashkenazy 1981   2  0.852  0.142  0.241  0.764  0.632  0.69
Beliavsky 2004   47  0.6645  0.0043  0.0737  0.0740  0.0643  0.06
BenOr 1989   13  0.7933  0.0021  0.1817  0.5027  0.2921  0.38
Biret 1990   4  0.8410  0.015  0.224  0.6814  0.524  0.59
Blet 2003   39  0.6932  0.0044  0.0644  0.0650  0.0553  0.05
Block 1995   30  0.7336  0.0037  0.0739  0.0739  0.0545  0.06
Brailowsky 1960   51  0.6343  0.0054  0.0655  0.0660  0.0450  0.05
Chiu 1999   18  0.777  0.0217  0.1311  0.5417  0.4810  0.51
Clidat 1994   38  0.6946  0.0047  0.0653  0.0653  0.0555  0.05
Cohen 1997   40  0.6941  0.0049  0.0741  0.0736  0.0741  0.07
Coop 1987   11  0.7959  0.0012  0.0916  0.5119  0.5012  0.50
Cortot 1951   20  0.7631  0.0027  0.1226  0.3219  0.3523  0.33
Czerny 1949   31  0.7360  0.0032  0.0732  0.1431  0.1434  0.14
Czerny 1949b   43  0.6857  0.0030  0.0729  0.1827  0.2627  0.22
Ezaki 2006   1  0.861  0.411  0.412  0.725  0.671  0.69
Falvay 1989   22  0.758  0.0233  0.0738  0.0734  0.0840  0.07
Ferenczy 1958   59  0.5565  0.0061  0.0649  0.0638  0.0554  0.05
Fiorentino 1962   23  0.7558  0.0020  0.1818  0.4928  0.3020  0.38
Fliere 1977   36  0.7151  0.0039  0.0836  0.0850  0.0542  0.06
Fou 1978   15  0.7722  0.0018  0.1519  0.4821  0.3917  0.43
Francois 1956   62  0.3534  0.0062  0.0558  0.0554  0.0561  0.05
Hatto 1997   28  0.7414  0.0131  0.0731  0.1419  0.3328  0.21
Horowitz 1971   56  0.5949  0.0055  0.0561  0.0557  0.0560  0.05
Horowitz 1985   60  0.5262  0.0059  0.0559  0.0549  0.0649  0.05
Indjic 2001   17  0.7711  0.0125  0.1124  0.3519  0.3822  0.36
Kapell 1951   5  0.835  0.064  0.183  0.699  0.495  0.58
Kiepura 1999   44  0.6839  0.0051  0.0650  0.0645  0.0547  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   25  0.7552  0.0015  0.1015  0.5123  0.4613  0.48
Kissin 1993   24  0.7556  0.0022  0.1621  0.4439  0.0731  0.18
Kitain 1937   61  0.4829  0.0058  0.0462  0.0444  0.0659  0.05
Kushner 1990   35  0.7119  0.0041  0.1033  0.106  0.6325  0.25
Levy 1951   34  0.7228  0.0024  0.1025  0.3535  0.0930  0.18
Luisada 1990   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Lushtak 2004   33  0.7213  0.0140  0.0934  0.0911  0.4629  0.20
Lympany 1968   49  0.6438  0.0052  0.0654  0.0643  0.0548  0.05
Magaloff 1977   16  0.7744  0.0013  0.0912  0.5421  0.4314  0.48
Magaloff 1977b   19  0.7730  0.0014  0.0913  0.5322  0.4216  0.47
Magin 1975   9  0.8027  0.0019  0.1520  0.4828  0.4615  0.47
Milkina 1970   41  0.6912  0.0145  0.0646  0.0648  0.0552  0.05
Mohovich 1999   21  0.7547  0.0026  0.1027  0.3131  0.2026  0.25
Nadelmann 1956   27  0.7425  0.0028  0.1628  0.2919  0.3424  0.31
Ohlsson 1999   46  0.6721  0.0036  0.0645  0.0635  0.0744  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   14  0.7854  0.0016  0.1414  0.5224  0.3518  0.43
Olejniczak 1991   10  0.799  0.018  0.309  0.5718  0.517  0.54
Osinska 1989   8  0.8118  0.0010  0.177  0.6017  0.478  0.53
Paderewski 1912   55  0.6055  0.0048  0.0643  0.0647  0.0556  0.05
Perahia 1994   52  0.6117  0.0046  0.0647  0.0639  0.0646  0.06
Perlemuter 1986   57  0.5840  0.0060  0.0560  0.0557  0.0462  0.04
Poblocka 1999   3  0.846  0.053  0.156  0.6319  0.496  0.56
Rangell 2001   12  0.7926  0.009  0.218  0.5720  0.499  0.53
Risler 1920   50  0.6361  0.0034  0.0648  0.0617  0.4433  0.16
Rosen 1989   53  0.6164  0.0056  0.0557  0.0549  0.0558  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   58  0.5748  0.0057  0.0652  0.0657  0.0451  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   26  0.753  0.1011  0.1622  0.4311  0.4319  0.43
Rubinstein 1966   37  0.7016  0.0042  0.0835  0.0830  0.1736  0.12
Rummel 1943   54  0.6150  0.0053  0.0742  0.0758  0.0457  0.05
Shebanova 2002   32  0.7220  0.0035  0.0651  0.0621  0.2537  0.12
Smith 1975   29  0.7323  0.0023  0.0823  0.3740  0.0832  0.17
Szpilman 1948   48  0.6663  0.0038  0.0740  0.0740  0.0739  0.07
Uninsky 1971   42  0.6942  0.0029  0.0730  0.1636  0.0738  0.11
Wasowski 1980   6  0.824  0.086  0.215  0.688  0.583  0.63
Weissenberg 1971   7  0.8115  0.017  0.2310  0.5520  0.4611  0.50
Random 1    65  -0.0335  0.0065  0.0265  0.0248  0.0464  0.03
Random 2   63  0.0424  0.0063  0.0463  0.041  0.5035  0.14
Random 3   64  0.0053  0.0064  0.0264  0.0235  0.0665  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).