Fiorentino 1962

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.70	62	0.00	45	0.05	49	0.05	10	0.43	40	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.76	53	0.00	21	0.12	19	0.48	25	0.42	19	0.45
Beliavsky 2004		41	0.69	42	0.00	31	0.07	31	0.14	24	0.25	35	0.19
BenOr 1989		5	0.81	43	0.00	5	0.27	3	0.75	2	0.72	4	0.73
Biret 1990		2	0.83	15	0.00	3	0.27	5	0.73	8	0.65	5	0.69
Blet 2003		21	0.76	5	0.00	19	0.10	29	0.27	6	0.64	24	0.42
Block 1995		20	0.76	9	0.00	22	0.11	24	0.35	4	0.56	21	0.44
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.67	54	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	30	0.16	55	0.08
Chiu 1999		15	0.77	31	0.00	15	0.11	15	0.53	7	0.56	17	0.54
Clidat 1994		46	0.68	32	0.00	48	0.06	42	0.06	31	0.13	53	0.09
Cohen 1997		42	0.68	37	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	29	0.13	56	0.08
Coop 1987		30	0.74	17	0.00	25	0.08	27	0.31	24	0.42	28	0.36
Cortot 1951		27	0.75	26	0.00	35	0.13	33	0.13	13	0.47	32	0.25
Czerny 1949		32	0.73	63	0.00	33	0.10	36	0.10	17	0.48	34	0.22
Czerny 1949b		45	0.68	55	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	13	0.49	31	0.25
Ezaki 2006		22	0.76	64	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.35	21	0.45	26	0.40
Falvay 1989		14	0.77	27	0.00	30	0.10	30	0.24	11	0.52	29	0.35
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.59	28	0.00	60	0.06	41	0.06	56	0.04	61	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		3	0.83	6	0.00	4	0.32	2	0.80	1	0.81	2	0.80
Fou 1978		31	0.73	33	0.00	29	0.10	25	0.33	22	0.37	30	0.35
Francois 1956		62	0.48	18	0.00	62	0.06	43	0.06	25	0.32	43	0.14
Hatto 1997		43	0.68	56	0.00	49	0.03	61	0.03	43	0.06	63	0.04
Horowitz 1971		52	0.64	8	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.06	28	0.18	51	0.10
Horowitz 1985		60	0.56	34	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.13	54	0.08
Indjic 2001		34	0.73	35	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	26	0.21	45	0.13
Kapell 1951		17	0.77	65	0.00	13	0.12	20	0.43	16	0.39	25	0.41
Kiepura 1999		48	0.66	3	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.38	42	0.14
Kilenyi 1937		25	0.76	19	0.00	16	0.14	11	0.60	7	0.67	8	0.63
Kissin 1993		9	0.79	10	0.00	6	0.19	6	0.70	5	0.66	6	0.68
Kitain 1937		61	0.51	57	0.00	61	0.04	56	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Kushner 1990		58	0.61	58	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	39	0.06	60	0.05
Levy 1951		23	0.76	11	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.41	15	0.48	20	0.44
Luisada 1990		26	0.75	44	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.30	18	0.49	27	0.38
Lushtak 2004		44	0.68	38	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	17	0.35	46	0.12
Lympany 1968		39	0.69	45	0.00	43	0.06	47	0.06	9	0.53	36	0.18
Magaloff 1977		16	0.77	29	0.00	12	0.12	13	0.56	9	0.57	15	0.56
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.76	23	0.00	14	0.10	17	0.51	10	0.54	18	0.52
Magin 1975		11	0.78	51	0.00	17	0.16	16	0.51	8	0.60	16	0.55
Milkina 1970		35	0.71	7	0.00	44	0.06	45	0.06	30	0.13	52	0.09
Mohovich 1999		18	0.76	24	0.00	18	0.12	14	0.55	3	0.68	10	0.61
Nadelmann 1956		13	0.78	59	0.00	20	0.09	18	0.49	3	0.66	14	0.57
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.69	36	0.00	36	0.11	34	0.11	10	0.46	33	0.22
Olejniczac 1990		1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	0.99
Olejniczak 1991		4	0.83	4	0.00	2	0.23	4	0.74	2	0.72	3	0.73
Osinska 1989		8	0.80	46	0.00	9	0.21	10	0.63	11	0.58	11	0.60
Paderewski 1912		50	0.65	60	0.00	47	0.06	44	0.06	31	0.19	49	0.11
Perahia 1994		56	0.62	2	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	14	0.34	41	0.15
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.63	47	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	24	0.28	48	0.11
Poblocka 1999		7	0.80	48	0.00	7	0.24	8	0.64	13	0.53	13	0.58
Rangell 2001		10	0.79	49	0.00	11	0.19	9	0.64	4	0.68	7	0.66
Risler 1920		55	0.62	20	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	12	0.48	39	0.15
Rosen 1989		51	0.64	21	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	34	0.08	58	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		57	0.61	30	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.07	59	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		38	0.69	12	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.07	16	0.37	38	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.65	50	0.00	50	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.05	62	0.04
Rummel 1943		54	0.63	25	0.00	42	0.05	50	0.05	21	0.28	47	0.12
Shebanova 2002		37	0.70	52	0.00	40	0.06	46	0.06	12	0.41	37	0.16
Smith 1975		33	0.73	39	0.00	34	0.11	35	0.11	39	0.09	50	0.10
Szpilman 1948		29	0.74	14	0.00	28	0.09	26	0.32	13	0.54	23	0.42
Uninsky 1971		12	0.78	16	0.00	10	0.17	12	0.57	3	0.66	9	0.61
Wasowski 1980		28	0.74	13	0.00	27	0.10	22	0.39	17	0.46	22	0.42
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.80	22	0.00	8	0.23	7	0.67	12	0.53	12	0.60
Random 1		63	0.04	40	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	6	0.54	44	0.13
Random 2		64	0.04	61	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	18	0.22	57	0.07
Random 3		65	0.00	41	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	38	0.06	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).