Rangell 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.64	25	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	58	0.03	61	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.78	47	0.00	21	0.19	18	0.51	23	0.43	23	0.47
Beliavsky 2004		28	0.74	35	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.09	16	0.33	33	0.17
BenOr 1989		14	0.79	30	0.00	18	0.14	10	0.58	18	0.49	14	0.53
Biret 1990		3	0.84	9	0.02	5	0.20	3	0.68	10	0.60	4	0.64
Blet 2003		40	0.69	5	0.08	24	0.11	30	0.22	20	0.26	30	0.24
Block 1995		22	0.76	29	0.00	27	0.11	27	0.34	16	0.40	26	0.37
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.58	50	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	61	0.03	59	0.04
Chiu 1999		11	0.80	28	0.00	14	0.12	19	0.50	14	0.50	19	0.50
Clidat 1994		37	0.69	60	0.00	44	0.07	40	0.07	30	0.14	43	0.10
Cohen 1997		42	0.68	37	0.00	48	0.09	34	0.09	28	0.17	40	0.12
Coop 1987		13	0.79	58	0.00	19	0.15	21	0.48	17	0.51	21	0.49
Cortot 1951		32	0.71	49	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	31	0.12	44	0.10
Czerny 1949		30	0.73	16	0.01	22	0.13	23	0.46	16	0.49	22	0.47
Czerny 1949b		46	0.65	65	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.16	29	0.24	31	0.20
Ezaki 2006		2	0.85	1	0.21	1	0.21	11	0.57	11	0.57	8	0.57
Falvay 1989		24	0.75	18	0.01	29	0.10	29	0.28	26	0.21	29	0.24
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.55	34	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	33	0.06	50	0.06
Fiorentino 1962		15	0.79	48	0.00	15	0.14	4	0.68	9	0.64	3	0.66
Fliere 1977		34	0.70	61	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	36	0.06	48	0.06
Fou 1978		18	0.78	15	0.01	20	0.19	17	0.51	10	0.48	20	0.49
Francois 1956		62	0.37	27	0.00	62	0.06	52	0.06	61	0.04	57	0.05
Hatto 1997		33	0.71	42	0.00	43	0.06	47	0.06	31	0.13	45	0.09
Horowitz 1971		53	0.60	24	0.01	53	0.05	58	0.05	36	0.07	51	0.06
Horowitz 1985		59	0.50	51	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.05	58	0.04
Indjic 2001		29	0.73	19	0.01	35	0.06	42	0.06	33	0.08	47	0.07
Kapell 1951		5	0.84	3	0.10	4	0.25	5	0.67	3	0.57	5	0.62
Kiepura 1999		41	0.69	36	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	25	0.27	38	0.13
Kilenyi 1937		17	0.78	44	0.00	12	0.13	15	0.54	14	0.57	11	0.55
Kissin 1993		9	0.80	8	0.02	8	0.11	7	0.63	13	0.54	7	0.58
Kitain 1937		61	0.47	33	0.00	59	0.04	60	0.04	46	0.06	56	0.05
Kushner 1990		50	0.63	54	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	31	0.16	42	0.10
Levy 1951		35	0.70	22	0.01	30	0.12	28	0.29	34	0.11	32	0.18
Luisada 1990		12	0.79	31	0.00	10	0.15	20	0.49	8	0.57	13	0.53
Lushtak 2004		51	0.63	45	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	56	0.05	54	0.05
Lympany 1968		36	0.70	17	0.01	31	0.09	31	0.16	10	0.52	28	0.29
Magaloff 1977		16	0.79	14	0.01	13	0.14	13	0.55	16	0.49	16	0.52
Magaloff 1977b		19	0.78	40	0.00	16	0.14	14	0.55	16	0.49	17	0.52
Magin 1975		10	0.80	10	0.02	9	0.11	16	0.53	22	0.50	18	0.51
Milkina 1970		44	0.66	43	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.04	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		21	0.77	4	0.09	17	0.12	12	0.56	6	0.58	9	0.57
Nadelmann 1956		31	0.72	11	0.02	33	0.08	35	0.08	20	0.33	34	0.16
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.66	38	0.00	46	0.06	43	0.06	34	0.08	46	0.07
Olejniczac 1990		8	0.82	6	0.07	7	0.20	1	0.73	7	0.66	1	0.69
Olejniczak 1991		6	0.84	2	0.16	2	0.17	2	0.70	3	0.67	2	0.68
Osinska 1989		7	0.82	13	0.01	11	0.15	9	0.58	13	0.54	10	0.56
Paderewski 1912		47	0.65	55	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.07	28	0.29	37	0.14
Perahia 1994		55	0.58	23	0.01	55	0.06	46	0.06	42	0.05	55	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		60	0.50	46	0.00	61	0.06	53	0.06	46	0.06	49	0.06
Poblocka 1999		4	0.84	52	0.00	6	0.22	8	0.58	17	0.51	12	0.54
Rangell 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Risler 1920		52	0.62	64	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.07	22	0.33	35	0.15
Rosen 1989		56	0.55	39	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.53	59	0.00	57	0.03	62	0.03	52	0.05	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		38	0.69	20	0.01	40	0.08	37	0.08	27	0.19	41	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.69	12	0.01	39	0.06	51	0.06	19	0.33	36	0.14
Rummel 1943		48	0.64	56	0.00	37	0.05	56	0.05	20	0.32	39	0.13
Shebanova 2002		43	0.67	26	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	43	0.05	53	0.05
Smith 1975		23	0.75	41	0.00	26	0.11	24	0.45	22	0.32	25	0.38
Szpilman 1948		27	0.74	32	0.00	23	0.12	22	0.47	8	0.57	15	0.52
Uninsky 1971		25	0.75	21	0.01	25	0.10	25	0.44	21	0.37	24	0.40
Wasowski 1980		26	0.74	53	0.00	28	0.13	26	0.37	25	0.30	27	0.33
Weissenberg 1971		1	0.85	7	0.04	3	0.23	6	0.65	9	0.55	6	0.60
Random 1		65	-0.04	63	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	49	0.04	63	0.03
Random 2		63	0.01	57	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	41	0.04	64	0.03
Random 3		64	-0.03	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	50	0.04	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).