Paderewski 1912

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		54	0.54	38	0.00	57	0.03	60	0.03	50	0.04	61	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.67	28	0.00	25	0.14	24	0.34	38	0.09	22	0.17
Beliavsky 2004		39	0.61	26	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.06	33	0.09	39	0.07
BenOr 1989		23	0.66	33	0.00	19	0.11	22	0.37	52	0.05	27	0.14
Biret 1990		14	0.68	18	0.00	17	0.12	13	0.54	42	0.06	21	0.18
Blet 2003		50	0.55	35	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	62	0.04	57	0.04
Block 1995		35	0.63	43	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.06	57	0.04	53	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.59	46	0.00	48	0.06	39	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.06
Chiu 1999		42	0.59	56	0.00	50	0.06	37	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.06
Clidat 1994		47	0.58	37	0.00	49	0.05	46	0.05	57	0.04	58	0.04
Cohen 1997		60	0.49	63	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.04
Coop 1987		22	0.67	60	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.30	33	0.13	18	0.20
Cortot 1951		37	0.62	23	0.00	33	0.08	35	0.08	45	0.05	47	0.06
Czerny 1949		25	0.66	10	0.01	13	0.10	15	0.49	27	0.25	10	0.35
Czerny 1949b		33	0.63	34	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	40	0.08	37	0.08
Ezaki 2006		38	0.62	65	0.00	38	0.05	44	0.05	38	0.08	41	0.06
Falvay 1989		56	0.53	61	0.00	55	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		26	0.66	2	0.28	2	0.27	8	0.57	1	0.71	1	0.64
Fiorentino 1962		30	0.65	51	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.19	44	0.06	32	0.11
Fliere 1977		28	0.65	49	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.20	46	0.05	33	0.10
Fou 1978		5	0.71	4	0.08	4	0.15	2	0.64	26	0.26	8	0.41
Francois 1956		62	0.41	30	0.00	62	0.06	42	0.06	38	0.07	48	0.06
Hatto 1997		46	0.58	62	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	48	0.06	51	0.05
Horowitz 1971		32	0.63	14	0.01	22	0.10	29	0.24	24	0.21	12	0.22
Horowitz 1985		51	0.55	29	0.00	44	0.04	56	0.04	35	0.08	42	0.06
Indjic 2001		34	0.63	58	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.06	46	0.06	46	0.06
Kapell 1951		20	0.67	50	0.00	18	0.11	21	0.39	55	0.05	26	0.14
Kiepura 1999		57	0.52	44	0.00	59	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		10	0.69	13	0.01	20	0.12	18	0.43	40	0.09	19	0.20
Kissin 1993		4	0.71	21	0.00	8	0.11	7	0.57	38	0.08	16	0.21
Kitain 1937		59	0.50	36	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	25	0.28	30	0.12
Kushner 1990		61	0.49	40	0.00	61	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.05	49	0.05
Levy 1951		3	0.71	9	0.02	5	0.20	3	0.63	23	0.38	5	0.49
Luisada 1990		41	0.60	55	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	43	0.06	52	0.05
Lushtak 2004		55	0.53	22	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	55	0.05	59	0.04
Lympany 1968		52	0.55	42	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	51	0.04	55	0.04
Magaloff 1977		7	0.71	24	0.00	11	0.11	6	0.58	49	0.06	20	0.19
Magaloff 1977b		6	0.71	27	0.00	12	0.15	5	0.59	37	0.08	11	0.22
Magin 1975		43	0.59	48	0.00	51	0.08	36	0.08	62	0.04	45	0.06
Milkina 1970		12	0.69	7	0.02	16	0.13	11	0.54	10	0.44	6	0.49
Mohovich 1999		27	0.66	20	0.00	27	0.09	26	0.30	59	0.04	31	0.11
Nadelmann 1956		49	0.55	12	0.01	41	0.06	43	0.06	56	0.04	50	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		18	0.67	11	0.01	23	0.11	20	0.41	15	0.37	9	0.39
Olejniczac 1990		24	0.66	59	0.00	28	0.10	27	0.29	52	0.05	29	0.12
Olejniczak 1991		36	0.62	54	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.09	36	0.09	35	0.09
Osinska 1989		21	0.67	53	0.00	21	0.13	17	0.43	54	0.05	25	0.15
Paderewski 1912		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Perahia 1994		58	0.51	41	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	62	0.03	62	0.03
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.54	19	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	38	0.09	40	0.07
Poblocka 1999		8	0.70	47	0.00	9	0.13	9	0.56	41	0.08	14	0.21
Rangell 2001		29	0.65	52	0.00	29	0.10	28	0.29	39	0.07	28	0.14
Risler 1920		48	0.56	39	0.00	42	0.04	54	0.04	31	0.14	38	0.07
Rosen 1989		45	0.59	25	0.00	43	0.04	55	0.04	25	0.24	34	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		40	0.60	15	0.01	39	0.05	49	0.05	26	0.18	36	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.68	6	0.02	24	0.12	23	0.35	33	0.08	23	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.69	31	0.00	15	0.10	16	0.46	13	0.44	7	0.45
Rummel 1943		17	0.67	8	0.02	6	0.13	12	0.54	3	0.58	3	0.56
Shebanova 2002		31	0.64	16	0.01	30	0.08	32	0.17	20	0.26	17	0.21
Smith 1975		1	0.73	1	0.31	1	0.31	1	0.71	13	0.41	4	0.54
Szpilman 1948		2	0.72	3	0.08	3	0.27	4	0.63	9	0.56	2	0.59
Uninsky 1971		16	0.68	5	0.03	14	0.11	19	0.43	39	0.06	24	0.16
Wasowski 1980		9	0.70	17	0.01	7	0.12	14	0.50	33	0.09	13	0.21
Weissenberg 1971		11	0.69	32	0.00	10	0.10	10	0.54	37	0.08	15	0.21
Random 1		64	-0.02	57	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	54	0.03	63	0.02
Random 2		63	-0.01	64	0.00	63	0.02	63	0.02	64	0.02	64	0.02
Random 3		65	-0.04	45	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	55	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).