Szpilman 1948

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.83	6	0.03	20	0.11	18	0.32	3	0.63	7	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.81	20	0.01	37	0.07	37	0.07	42	0.06	50	0.06
Beliavsky 2004		24	0.84	14	0.01	17	0.10	21	0.27	2	0.56	13	0.39
BenOr 1989		10	0.87	13	0.01	14	0.15	12	0.43	25	0.31	16	0.37
Biret 1990		43	0.79	32	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	33	0.08	51	0.06
Blet 2003		19	0.84	46	0.00	18	0.10	17	0.35	12	0.29	18	0.32
Block 1995		51	0.74	47	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.05	62	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		42	0.79	51	0.00	44	0.05	51	0.05	18	0.33	35	0.13
Chiu 1999		49	0.76	61	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.06	37	0.09	47	0.07
Clidat 1994		17	0.85	54	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.25	26	0.16	27	0.20
Cohen 1997		63	0.52	58	0.00	63	0.06	41	0.06	49	0.05	55	0.05
Coop 1987		29	0.82	19	0.01	15	0.11	15	0.39	31	0.17	20	0.26
Cortot 1951		60	0.70	55	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	43	0.05	64	0.04
Czerny 1949		12	0.87	12	0.01	6	0.28	6	0.54	7	0.50	4	0.52
Czerny 1949b		6	0.88	2	0.14	2	0.28	3	0.63	5	0.58	2	0.60
Ezaki 2006		13	0.85	21	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.38	29	0.15	21	0.24
Falvay 1989		46	0.79	9	0.01	22	0.08	25	0.20	31	0.15	31	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.71	59	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	30	0.11	48	0.07
Fiorentino 1962		9	0.88	24	0.00	12	0.10	11	0.43	17	0.39	12	0.41
Fliere 1977		3	0.89	7	0.03	7	0.19	5	0.55	16	0.36	8	0.44
Fou 1978		31	0.82	34	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.20	38	0.07	39	0.12
Francois 1956		37	0.81	16	0.01	34	0.09	33	0.09	7	0.47	25	0.21
Hatto 1997		57	0.71	45	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	43	0.05	61	0.04
Horowitz 1971		38	0.80	33	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.06	56	0.05
Horowitz 1985		54	0.72	26	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	19	0.38	41	0.11
Indjic 2001		58	0.71	64	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	43	0.05	54	0.05
Kapell 1951		28	0.83	36	0.00	19	0.12	19	0.31	27	0.18	22	0.24
Kiepura 1999		35	0.81	56	0.00	39	0.06	40	0.06	25	0.35	33	0.14
Kilenyi 1937		15	0.85	28	0.00	13	0.13	13	0.42	25	0.33	15	0.37
Kissin 1993		21	0.84	10	0.01	4	0.25	7	0.50	27	0.22	17	0.33
Kitain 1937		62	0.57	8	0.02	61	0.04	59	0.04	7	0.47	34	0.14
Kushner 1990		23	0.84	41	0.00	32	0.09	30	0.17	31	0.13	32	0.15
Levy 1951		48	0.77	39	0.00	54	0.06	39	0.06	11	0.49	30	0.17
Luisada 1990		2	0.89	3	0.07	3	0.30	4	0.63	2	0.63	1	0.63
Lushtak 2004		26	0.84	65	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.28	26	0.17	23	0.22
Lympany 1968		36	0.81	49	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	54	0.04	58	0.04
Magaloff 1977		20	0.84	35	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.19	27	0.23	24	0.21
Magaloff 1977b		22	0.84	52	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.18	27	0.20	28	0.19
Magin 1975		40	0.80	37	0.00	42	0.05	52	0.05	41	0.07	49	0.06
Milkina 1970		45	0.79	53	0.00	43	0.04	53	0.04	34	0.06	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		7	0.88	22	0.00	10	0.13	14	0.41	10	0.47	10	0.44
Nadelmann 1956		44	0.79	18	0.01	33	0.08	36	0.08	12	0.39	29	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.72	44	0.00	55	0.04	54	0.04	49	0.05	60	0.04
Olejniczac 1990		8	0.88	30	0.00	11	0.10	10	0.45	17	0.40	11	0.42
Olejniczak 1991		16	0.85	38	0.00	25	0.07	31	0.16	35	0.10	36	0.13
Osinska 1989		4	0.88	4	0.05	5	0.23	2	0.66	10	0.42	3	0.53
Paderewski 1912		14	0.85	29	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.21	11	0.38	19	0.28
Perahia 1994		61	0.66	57	0.00	62	0.05	44	0.05	25	0.22	42	0.10
Perlemuter 1986		11	0.87	48	0.00	8	0.10	9	0.47	12	0.42	9	0.44
Poblocka 1999		25	0.84	50	0.00	31	0.07	32	0.14	33	0.11	38	0.12
Rangell 2001		47	0.78	62	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.05	51	0.05	57	0.05
Risler 1920		18	0.84	11	0.01	23	0.06	22	0.25	3	0.58	14	0.38
Rosen 1989		41	0.79	27	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	35	0.06	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.72	23	0.00	46	0.05	45	0.05	29	0.15	43	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.81	31	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.05	28	0.18	46	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.76	5	0.04	45	0.05	49	0.05	20	0.28	40	0.12
Rummel 1943		56	0.72	42	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	23	0.22	45	0.09
Shebanova 2002		34	0.81	15	0.01	35	0.09	34	0.09	31	0.20	37	0.13
Smith 1975		5	0.88	25	0.00	9	0.10	8	0.48	14	0.44	6	0.46
Szpilman 1948		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1971		30	0.82	63	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.20	21	0.21	26	0.20
Wasowski 1980		52	0.73	40	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.04	59	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		39	0.80	17	0.01	36	0.08	35	0.08	36	0.10	44	0.09
Average		1	0.91	1	0.46	1	0.45	1	0.75	23	0.33	5	0.50
Random 1		66	-0.14	60	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	47	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		64	0.04	66	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.03	65	0.03
Random 3		65	-0.11	43	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	23	0.16	63	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).