Wasowski 1980

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   54  0.7026  0.0039  0.0636  0.0652  0.0544  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   7  0.816  0.065  0.159  0.4833  0.093  0.21
Beliavsky 2004   30  0.7539  0.0050  0.0548  0.0544  0.0541  0.05
BenOr 1989   12  0.8047  0.0012  0.1611  0.4356  0.0517  0.15
Biret 1990   51  0.7134  0.0023  0.0722  0.2454  0.0426  0.10
Blet 2003   45  0.7355  0.0051  0.0455  0.0464  0.0362  0.03
Block 1995   59  0.6635  0.0060  0.0541  0.0560  0.0459  0.04
Brailowsky 1960   35  0.7561  0.0045  0.0450  0.0454  0.0550  0.04
Chiu 1999   53  0.7015  0.0226  0.0826  0.1854  0.0527  0.09
Clidat 1994   44  0.7324  0.0037  0.0540  0.0563  0.0458  0.04
Cohen 1997   62  0.5252  0.0062  0.0459  0.0433  0.0837  0.06
Coop 1987   47  0.7258  0.0047  0.0452  0.0453  0.0556  0.04
Cortot 1951   33  0.7549  0.0053  0.0633  0.0631  0.1234  0.08
Czerny 1949   29  0.7536  0.0029  0.0631  0.1250  0.0532  0.08
Czerny 1949b   13  0.7946  0.0017  0.1013  0.3661  0.0420  0.12
Ezaki 2006   19  0.775  0.0719  0.0918  0.3037  0.0912  0.16
Falvay 1989   49  0.7163  0.0056  0.0461  0.0460  0.0453  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   61  0.6260  0.0057  0.0362  0.0358  0.0463  0.03
Fiorentino 1962   23  0.7656  0.0038  0.0544  0.0553  0.0545  0.05
Fliere 1977   4  0.824  0.084  0.213  0.5655  0.058  0.17
Fou 1978   10  0.8021  0.0113  0.1112  0.4353  0.0515  0.15
Francois 1956   24  0.7631  0.0052  0.0547  0.0551  0.0548  0.05
Hatto 1997   41  0.7314  0.0214  0.0817  0.3048  0.0521  0.12
Horowitz 1971   34  0.7533  0.0021  0.0821  0.2749  0.0523  0.12
Horowitz 1985   55  0.6941  0.0054  0.0456  0.0420  0.3418  0.12
Indjic 2001   42  0.7316  0.0115  0.1019  0.2950  0.0522  0.12
Kapell 1951   39  0.7343  0.0046  0.0457  0.0451  0.0555  0.04
Kiepura 1999   16  0.7932  0.0040  0.0634  0.0652  0.0539  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   43  0.7348  0.0044  0.0545  0.0555  0.0542  0.05
Kissin 1993   32  0.7553  0.0025  0.0924  0.2060  0.0429  0.09
Kitain 1937   63  0.4338  0.0063  0.0638  0.0642  0.0638  0.06
Kushner 1990   27  0.7620  0.0122  0.0716  0.3561  0.0324  0.10
Levy 1951   56  0.6928  0.0049  0.0453  0.0439  0.0640  0.05
Luisada 1990   15  0.7922  0.0132  0.0632  0.1250  0.0533  0.08
Lushtak 2004   3  0.839  0.036  0.154  0.5556  0.0416  0.15
Lympany 1968   26  0.7664  0.0031  0.0830  0.1455  0.0435  0.07
Magaloff 1977   9  0.8119  0.0111  0.146  0.5043  0.077  0.19
Magaloff 1977b   8  0.8123  0.0010  0.118  0.5046  0.0611  0.17
Magin 1975   11  0.8012  0.0216  0.0914  0.3538  0.0810  0.17
Milkina 1970   5  0.818  0.047  0.127  0.5050  0.0513  0.16
Mohovich 1999   25  0.7659  0.0043  0.0542  0.0557  0.0461  0.04
Nadelmann 1956   31  0.7529  0.0028  0.0729  0.1557  0.0431  0.08
Ohlsson 1999   48  0.7142  0.0036  0.0546  0.0555  0.0457  0.04
Olejniczac 1990   22  0.7640  0.0033  0.0635  0.0650  0.0543  0.05
Olejniczak 1991   21  0.7744  0.0030  0.0727  0.1656  0.0528  0.09
Osinska 1989   2  0.847  0.043  0.142  0.6050  0.059  0.17
Paderewski 1912   38  0.7418  0.0148  0.0451  0.0463  0.0364  0.03
Perahia 1994   57  0.6810  0.0320  0.0828  0.1511  0.432  0.25
Perlemuter 1986   37  0.7411  0.0227  0.0725  0.1950  0.0525  0.10
Poblocka 1999   20  0.7730  0.0034  0.0539  0.0556  0.0451  0.04
Rangell 2001   28  0.7651  0.0035  0.0637  0.0652  0.0546  0.05
Risler 1920   60  0.6254  0.0061  0.0364  0.0354  0.0552  0.04
Rosen 1989   52  0.7125  0.0058  0.0363  0.0364  0.0465  0.03
Rubinstein 1939   50  0.713  0.099  0.1123  0.2119  0.311  0.26
Rubinstein 1952   36  0.7427  0.0042  0.0549  0.0540  0.0547  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   18  0.7717  0.0118  0.0915  0.3531  0.124  0.20
Rummel 1943   46  0.7357  0.0055  0.0543  0.0552  0.0460  0.04
Shebanova 2002   14  0.791  0.191  0.195  0.5449  0.0514  0.16
Smith 1975   17  0.7837  0.0024  0.0820  0.2938  0.0519  0.12
Szpilman 1948   40  0.7345  0.0041  0.0454  0.0462  0.0449  0.04
Uninsky 1971   6  0.8113  0.028  0.1310  0.4634  0.085  0.19
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Weissenberg 1971   58  0.6750  0.0059  0.0460  0.0451  0.0554  0.04
Average   1  0.842  0.152  0.211  0.7153  0.056  0.19
Random 1    65  -0.1165  0.0065  0.0265  0.0212  0.3430  0.08
Random 2   64  0.0266  0.0064  0.0458  0.0429  0.1336  0.07
Random 3   66  -0.2162  0.0066  0.0166  0.0128  0.1166  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).