Fliere 1977

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.82	28	0.00	42	0.09	33	0.09	8	0.54	32	0.22
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.86	35	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	16	0.36	44	0.16
Beliavsky 2004		42	0.83	54	0.00	47	0.08	34	0.08	11	0.45	35	0.19
BenOr 1989		4	0.91	11	0.01	3	0.22	7	0.52	7	0.60	5	0.56
Biret 1990		56	0.76	43	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	44	0.05	62	0.05
Blet 2003		30	0.87	12	0.01	23	0.11	19	0.33	4	0.48	20	0.40
Block 1995		55	0.79	50	0.00	56	0.06	49	0.06	35	0.11	60	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.81	65	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	8	0.47	46	0.15
Chiu 1999		37	0.85	20	0.01	24	0.08	24	0.22	15	0.43	25	0.31
Clidat 1994		22	0.88	38	0.00	17	0.09	14	0.40	5	0.51	14	0.45
Cohen 1997		62	0.57	62	0.00	63	0.06	48	0.06	47	0.05	61	0.05
Coop 1987		23	0.88	24	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.35	21	0.32	23	0.33
Cortot 1951		57	0.75	58	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	40	0.05	64	0.04
Czerny 1949		25	0.88	45	0.00	7	0.15	11	0.44	3	0.61	8	0.52
Czerny 1949b		12	0.90	16	0.01	4	0.18	5	0.55	4	0.61	4	0.58
Ezaki 2006		5	0.91	26	0.00	9	0.13	6	0.52	13	0.48	10	0.50
Falvay 1989		31	0.86	15	0.01	26	0.07	29	0.18	19	0.36	30	0.25
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.79	63	0.00	38	0.06	45	0.06	12	0.45	43	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		3	0.92	5	0.02	6	0.18	4	0.57	4	0.68	3	0.62
Fliere 1977		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fou 1978		9	0.91	10	0.01	15	0.10	10	0.45	8	0.61	7	0.52
Francois 1956		43	0.83	22	0.00	44	0.05	51	0.05	8	0.46	47	0.15
Hatto 1997		50	0.81	3	0.04	11	0.12	22	0.26	3	0.64	19	0.41
Horowitz 1971		41	0.83	36	0.00	45	0.06	42	0.06	11	0.44	45	0.16
Horowitz 1985		60	0.71	55	0.00	60	0.03	64	0.03	16	0.44	56	0.11
Indjic 2001		51	0.81	14	0.01	12	0.12	23	0.25	3	0.64	21	0.40
Kapell 1951		26	0.88	44	0.00	33	0.07	40	0.07	22	0.26	51	0.13
Kiepura 1999		33	0.86	25	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.06	6	0.53	36	0.18
Kilenyi 1937		8	0.91	29	0.00	8	0.12	9	0.48	7	0.54	9	0.51
Kissin 1993		6	0.91	2	0.06	2	0.21	3	0.57	8	0.44	11	0.50
Kitain 1937		63	0.51	52	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	15	0.38	49	0.14
Kushner 1990		28	0.87	39	0.00	27	0.06	28	0.18	6	0.49	27	0.30
Levy 1951		52	0.80	17	0.01	54	0.05	54	0.05	7	0.56	41	0.17
Luisada 1990		14	0.89	30	0.00	30	0.06	32	0.12	15	0.39	33	0.22
Lushtak 2004		10	0.90	51	0.00	20	0.10	17	0.36	9	0.53	16	0.44
Lympany 1968		29	0.87	33	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.16	8	0.49	28	0.28
Magaloff 1977		15	0.89	57	0.00	31	0.07	27	0.20	5	0.50	24	0.32
Magaloff 1977b		18	0.89	53	0.00	32	0.11	26	0.20	5	0.49	26	0.31
Magin 1975		21	0.88	7	0.01	37	0.08	35	0.08	26	0.42	38	0.18
Milkina 1970		27	0.87	42	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.07	4	0.58	34	0.20
Mohovich 1999		32	0.86	37	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.07	11	0.47	39	0.18
Nadelmann 1956		45	0.83	32	0.00	39	0.06	46	0.06	5	0.47	42	0.17
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.80	27	0.00	53	0.06	50	0.06	31	0.11	59	0.08
Olejniczac 1990		2	0.92	9	0.01	5	0.16	2	0.57	4	0.68	2	0.62
Olejniczak 1991		7	0.91	23	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.41	11	0.50	13	0.45
Osinska 1989		11	0.90	49	0.00	21	0.11	12	0.43	11	0.40	18	0.41
Paderewski 1912		36	0.85	6	0.02	25	0.07	31	0.12	4	0.53	31	0.25
Perahia 1994		61	0.64	59	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	20	0.29	57	0.11
Perlemuter 1986		24	0.88	18	0.01	10	0.16	15	0.39	3	0.57	12	0.47
Poblocka 1999		17	0.89	61	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.20	20	0.34	29	0.26
Rangell 2001		35	0.85	47	0.00	43	0.06	47	0.06	28	0.27	54	0.13
Risler 1920		44	0.83	19	0.01	46	0.07	37	0.07	20	0.46	37	0.18
Rosen 1989		39	0.84	60	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	20	0.27	55	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.74	40	0.00	59	0.06	44	0.06	16	0.33	48	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.84	46	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	26	0.18	58	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.81	48	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	15	0.35	52	0.13
Rummel 1943		58	0.75	21	0.00	57	0.04	60	0.04	12	0.41	53	0.13
Shebanova 2002		16	0.89	31	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.31	9	0.50	22	0.39
Smith 1975		13	0.90	8	0.01	14	0.12	8	0.50	4	0.61	6	0.55
Szpilman 1948		20	0.89	13	0.01	18	0.08	16	0.36	5	0.55	15	0.44
Uninsky 1971		19	0.89	4	0.03	13	0.10	21	0.28	2	0.63	17	0.42
Wasowski 1980		47	0.82	34	0.00	48	0.05	55	0.05	3	0.56	40	0.17
Weissenberg 1971		38	0.84	41	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	21	0.29	50	0.13
Average		1	0.96	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.79	4	0.65	1	0.72
Random 1		65	-0.10	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	43	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.06	56	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	48	0.04	63	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.18	64	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	43	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).