Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.76	25	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.20	41	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		30	0.82	42	0.00	44	0.07	36	0.07	35	0.08	51	0.07
Beliavsky 2004		39	0.80	55	0.00	51	0.07	39	0.07	21	0.28	33	0.14
BenOr 1989		11	0.86	16	0.01	21	0.08	20	0.30	36	0.09	30	0.16
Biret 1990		34	0.81	8	0.02	20	0.08	18	0.35	3	0.59	7	0.45
Blet 2003		32	0.81	51	0.00	34	0.08	35	0.08	36	0.08	45	0.08
Block 1995		58	0.71	38	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	41	0.07	60	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		37	0.80	31	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	22	0.26	39	0.11
Chiu 1999		55	0.72	47	0.00	40	0.05	52	0.05	51	0.05	58	0.05
Clidat 1994		23	0.83	34	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.07	43	0.06	55	0.06
Cohen 1997		63	0.48	32	0.00	63	0.06	48	0.06	28	0.11	48	0.08
Coop 1987		28	0.82	5	0.04	7	0.22	8	0.48	20	0.33	13	0.40
Cortot 1951		56	0.71	48	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.03	64	0.03
Czerny 1949		8	0.87	56	0.00	11	0.12	9	0.47	22	0.35	11	0.41
Czerny 1949b		9	0.87	40	0.00	13	0.10	17	0.36	30	0.22	21	0.28
Ezaki 2006		27	0.82	24	0.00	35	0.07	42	0.07	35	0.09	44	0.08
Falvay 1989		53	0.74	22	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	48	0.06	52	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.69	20	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.16	21	0.30	26	0.22
Fiorentino 1962		15	0.85	41	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.27	48	0.06	36	0.13
Fliere 1977		10	0.86	27	0.00	12	0.09	11	0.47	36	0.07	27	0.18
Fou 1978		41	0.79	54	0.00	43	0.05	53	0.05	41	0.07	53	0.06
Francois 1956		26	0.82	19	0.00	50	0.07	40	0.07	18	0.35	31	0.16
Hatto 1997		60	0.71	36	0.00	47	0.07	41	0.07	32	0.12	42	0.09
Horowitz 1971		31	0.81	17	0.01	36	0.07	37	0.07	18	0.35	29	0.16
Horowitz 1985		52	0.75	29	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.52	32	0.14
Indjic 2001		59	0.71	46	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	32	0.12	47	0.08
Kapell 1951		20	0.84	7	0.03	8	0.22	15	0.40	20	0.35	14	0.37
Kiepura 1999		46	0.78	65	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	40	0.06	57	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		21	0.83	11	0.01	16	0.11	12	0.45	31	0.22	19	0.31
Kissin 1993		24	0.83	2	0.17	2	0.23	5	0.54	13	0.40	6	0.46
Kitain 1937		62	0.52	23	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	17	0.38	38	0.12
Kushner 1990		4	0.90	6	0.03	3	0.19	3	0.73	4	0.59	2	0.66
Levy 1951		57	0.71	52	0.00	58	0.03	64	0.03	33	0.06	62	0.04
Luisada 1990		5	0.88	50	0.00	14	0.11	13	0.44	16	0.38	12	0.41
Lushtak 2004		25	0.83	33	0.00	33	0.06	44	0.06	35	0.09	50	0.07
Lympany 1968		22	0.83	37	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	23	0.25	28	0.17
Magaloff 1977		40	0.79	57	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	50	0.05	59	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		42	0.79	66	0.00	53	0.06	43	0.06	42	0.06	56	0.06
Magin 1975		33	0.81	26	0.00	38	0.09	34	0.09	31	0.15	37	0.12
Milkina 1970		19	0.84	13	0.01	24	0.08	26	0.23	11	0.48	17	0.33
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Nadelmann 1956		18	0.84	30	0.00	17	0.07	19	0.32	10	0.40	15	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.76	44	0.00	28	0.06	29	0.15	23	0.31	25	0.22
Olejniczac 1990		14	0.85	35	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.29	45	0.06	35	0.13
Olejniczak 1991		13	0.85	43	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.44	24	0.28	16	0.35
Osinska 1989		1	0.92	1	0.32	1	0.32	1	0.80	4	0.60	1	0.69
Paderewski 1912		16	0.84	45	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	29	0.22	40	0.11
Perahia 1994		45	0.78	14	0.01	30	0.06	30	0.12	1	0.64	22	0.28
Perlemuter 1986		7	0.88	3	0.12	5	0.24	6	0.51	15	0.38	9	0.44
Poblocka 1999		17	0.84	28	0.00	18	0.07	24	0.28	26	0.24	23	0.26
Rangell 2001		43	0.79	53	0.00	27	0.07	28	0.15	45	0.06	43	0.09
Risler 1920		35	0.80	59	0.00	41	0.05	55	0.05	26	0.33	34	0.13
Rosen 1989		54	0.74	39	0.00	56	0.03	61	0.03	52	0.05	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		44	0.79	18	0.01	39	0.10	33	0.10	4	0.63	24	0.25
Rubinstein 1952		12	0.85	9	0.02	9	0.17	7	0.48	6	0.56	4	0.52
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.80	10	0.01	23	0.09	16	0.38	6	0.62	5	0.49
Rummel 1943		51	0.76	61	0.00	59	0.03	62	0.03	21	0.23	46	0.08
Shebanova 2002		29	0.82	15	0.01	22	0.08	21	0.30	22	0.28	20	0.29
Smith 1975		2	0.91	21	0.00	6	0.26	4	0.59	3	0.69	3	0.64
Szpilman 1948		6	0.88	12	0.01	10	0.12	10	0.47	14	0.41	8	0.44
Uninsky 1971		47	0.76	60	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.11	58	0.04	49	0.07
Wasowski 1980		49	0.76	49	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	42	0.05	61	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		38	0.80	58	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.29	15	0.36	18	0.32
Average		3	0.90	4	0.11	4	0.29	2	0.79	29	0.22	10	0.42
Random 1		65	-0.15	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	61	0.02	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.04	63	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	31	0.10	54	0.06
Random 3		66	-0.19	62	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	55	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).