Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		52	0.70	48	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	50	0.05	48	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.82	4	0.04	18	0.14	15	0.43	21	0.28	10	0.35
Beliavsky 2004		55	0.65	53	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	60	0.03	64	0.03
BenOr 1989		14	0.84	9	0.02	16	0.13	13	0.50	38	0.08	18	0.20
Biret 1990		40	0.74	57	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.16	17	0.31	14	0.22
Blet 2003		27	0.79	58	0.00	42	0.07	35	0.07	47	0.05	37	0.06
Block 1995		15	0.84	7	0.03	11	0.10	22	0.32	15	0.41	9	0.36
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.65	63	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.04
Chiu 1999		7	0.87	13	0.01	7	0.16	9	0.53	22	0.32	7	0.41
Clidat 1994		28	0.79	15	0.01	36	0.05	44	0.05	48	0.05	47	0.05
Cohen 1997		58	0.57	10	0.02	55	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.05	59	0.04
Coop 1987		1	0.90	2	0.27	2	0.28	4	0.64	18	0.37	5	0.49
Cortot 1951		45	0.73	65	0.00	54	0.04	52	0.04	52	0.04	61	0.04
Czerny 1949		51	0.70	31	0.00	19	0.08	20	0.33	37	0.07	21	0.15
Czerny 1949b		31	0.77	39	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.32	43	0.06	24	0.14
Ezaki 2006		12	0.85	11	0.01	15	0.10	14	0.49	38	0.09	15	0.21
Falvay 1989		10	0.86	38	0.00	10	0.10	17	0.38	27	0.20	11	0.28
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.75	60	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.06	35	0.08	35	0.07
Fiorentino 1962		22	0.83	22	0.01	23	0.08	16	0.39	46	0.06	23	0.15
Fliere 1977		26	0.80	16	0.01	31	0.05	31	0.11	50	0.06	31	0.08
Fou 1978		25	0.81	29	0.00	37	0.05	45	0.05	61	0.04	57	0.04
Francois 1956		57	0.64	66	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.04
Hatto 1997		42	0.74	43	0.00	40	0.08	34	0.08	35	0.06	34	0.07
Horowitz 1971		39	0.75	23	0.01	45	0.05	46	0.05	50	0.05	51	0.05
Horowitz 1985		61	0.55	17	0.01	62	0.05	42	0.05	48	0.06	42	0.05
Indjic 2001		43	0.73	27	0.00	41	0.08	33	0.08	42	0.05	39	0.06
Kapell 1951		2	0.89	3	0.06	4	0.18	3	0.64	15	0.45	2	0.54
Kiepura 1999		36	0.76	51	0.00	46	0.04	57	0.04	50	0.05	52	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		13	0.85	41	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.51	34	0.09	16	0.21
Kissin 1993		3	0.89	5	0.03	6	0.25	2	0.65	35	0.12	12	0.28
Kitain 1937		63	0.29	49	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04
Kushner 1990		30	0.77	46	0.00	28	0.06	30	0.14	54	0.04	33	0.07
Levy 1951		53	0.69	34	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	50	0.04	56	0.04
Luisada 1990		18	0.84	19	0.01	22	0.08	24	0.30	52	0.05	26	0.12
Lushtak 2004		20	0.83	44	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.15	49	0.05	30	0.09
Lympany 1968		29	0.78	54	0.00	38	0.05	47	0.05	41	0.05	41	0.05
Magaloff 1977		19	0.83	62	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.21	44	0.06	27	0.11
Magaloff 1977b		21	0.83	45	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.19	45	0.06	28	0.11
Magin 1975		4	0.89	1	0.29	1	0.29	1	0.69	11	0.58	1	0.63
Milkina 1970		35	0.76	25	0.00	50	0.06	40	0.06	54	0.04	44	0.05
Mohovich 1999		33	0.76	33	0.00	20	0.08	23	0.31	29	0.15	13	0.22
Nadelmann 1956		50	0.70	35	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.06	37	0.06	36	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Olejniczac 1990		23	0.82	14	0.01	24	0.13	18	0.38	44	0.06	22	0.15
Olejniczak 1991		9	0.87	6	0.03	3	0.22	5	0.63	21	0.32	6	0.45
Osinska 1989		16	0.84	21	0.01	9	0.15	10	0.52	38	0.08	17	0.20
Paderewski 1912		41	0.74	24	0.00	35	0.06	39	0.06	44	0.06	38	0.06
Perahia 1994		62	0.49	28	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.06	49	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		54	0.69	40	0.00	44	0.06	36	0.06	60	0.04	45	0.05
Poblocka 1999		5	0.89	8	0.03	5	0.18	6	0.63	19	0.41	3	0.51
Rangell 2001		8	0.87	30	0.00	14	0.18	8	0.57	17	0.43	4	0.50
Risler 1920		46	0.73	50	0.00	51	0.05	43	0.05	52	0.05	43	0.05
Rosen 1989		34	0.76	52	0.00	48	0.05	50	0.05	45	0.05	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		60	0.55	55	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.03	63	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.75	20	0.01	32	0.05	32	0.10	50	0.04	40	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.71	32	0.00	34	0.06	38	0.06	43	0.04	46	0.05
Rummel 1943		59	0.57	47	0.00	59	0.03	64	0.03	59	0.03	65	0.03
Shebanova 2002		17	0.84	18	0.01	17	0.11	19	0.36	35	0.07	19	0.16
Smith 1975		32	0.77	37	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.15	51	0.05	29	0.09
Szpilman 1948		47	0.72	36	0.00	43	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.04	54	0.04
Uninsky 1971		44	0.73	56	0.00	47	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.04
Wasowski 1980		48	0.71	42	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	46	0.05	53	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		11	0.86	26	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.50	18	0.31	8	0.39
Average		6	0.87	12	0.01	8	0.14	7	0.59	58	0.04	20	0.15
Random 1		65	-0.07	59	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	19	0.24	32	0.07
Random 2		64	0.10	64	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	5	0.38	25	0.12
Random 3		66	-0.15	61	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	41	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).