Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		57	0.71	57	0.00	59	0.05	54	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		29	0.86	40	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.11	15	0.37	30	0.20
Beliavsky 2004		53	0.75	41	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04	58	0.04
BenOr 1989		12	0.91	11	0.01	14	0.20	12	0.65	8	0.59	11	0.62
Biret 1990		54	0.75	51	0.00	47	0.06	49	0.06	31	0.13	42	0.09
Blet 2003		34	0.84	52	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	49	0.05	48	0.06
Block 1995		19	0.89	24	0.00	18	0.19	18	0.45	3	0.59	17	0.52
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.78	38	0.00	49	0.08	40	0.08	24	0.23	38	0.14
Chiu 1999		11	0.92	25	0.00	10	0.23	11	0.65	5	0.60	10	0.62
Clidat 1994		27	0.87	35	0.00	25	0.10	27	0.22	16	0.32	24	0.27
Cohen 1997		62	0.53	61	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Coop 1987		2	0.95	1	0.31	1	0.30	3	0.77	2	0.72	3	0.74
Cortot 1951		45	0.79	42	0.00	52	0.07	42	0.07	17	0.33	37	0.15
Czerny 1949		30	0.86	8	0.01	12	0.25	17	0.50	11	0.49	19	0.49
Czerny 1949b		20	0.89	6	0.04	17	0.19	15	0.55	8	0.54	15	0.54
Ezaki 2006		1	0.96	2	0.29	2	0.42	1	0.83	2	0.76	1	0.79
Falvay 1989		8	0.93	5	0.05	6	0.18	7	0.70	4	0.67	7	0.68
Ferenczy 1958		42	0.80	31	0.00	38	0.10	36	0.10	10	0.49	28	0.22
Fiorentino 1962		23	0.88	53	0.00	24	0.11	25	0.30	20	0.31	23	0.30
Fliere 1977		18	0.89	65	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.34	25	0.20	25	0.26
Fou 1978		13	0.91	13	0.01	16	0.19	14	0.60	5	0.67	9	0.63
Francois 1956		52	0.75	62	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	49	0.05	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		50	0.76	30	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	59	0.04	51	0.05
Horowitz 1971		47	0.78	32	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.05
Horowitz 1985		60	0.56	64	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04	57	0.04
Indjic 2001		51	0.76	44	0.00	48	0.07	45	0.07	54	0.05	49	0.06
Kapell 1951		4	0.94	16	0.01	4	0.20	4	0.74	3	0.73	4	0.73
Kiepura 1999		38	0.83	56	0.00	36	0.06	51	0.06	15	0.45	34	0.16
Kilenyi 1937		7	0.93	15	0.01	7	0.15	8	0.70	6	0.60	8	0.65
Kissin 1993		9	0.92	14	0.01	11	0.21	10	0.65	7	0.45	16	0.54
Kitain 1937		63	0.41	45	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.04	62	0.04
Kushner 1990		39	0.82	33	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.16	28	0.14	36	0.15
Levy 1951		46	0.79	48	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.07	4	0.62	29	0.21
Luisada 1990		17	0.90	22	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.33	14	0.40	21	0.36
Lushtak 2004		16	0.90	46	0.00	19	0.10	22	0.33	13	0.43	20	0.38
Lympany 1968		28	0.86	26	0.00	35	0.07	44	0.07	12	0.44	32	0.18
Magaloff 1977		24	0.88	12	0.01	32	0.06	31	0.11	14	0.34	31	0.19
Magaloff 1977b		26	0.88	18	0.01	33	0.10	34	0.10	14	0.34	33	0.18
Magin 1975		3	0.94	3	0.07	3	0.34	5	0.73	1	0.76	2	0.74
Milkina 1970		44	0.80	27	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	36	0.06	46	0.06
Mohovich 1999		36	0.84	28	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.24	24	0.28	27	0.26
Nadelmann 1956		55	0.75	10	0.01	29	0.07	29	0.13	55	0.04	44	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		21	0.89	43	0.00	20	0.09	19	0.41	6	0.63	18	0.51
Olejniczac 1990		25	0.88	39	0.00	23	0.10	23	0.32	19	0.31	22	0.31
Olejniczak 1991		15	0.91	55	0.00	13	0.17	13	0.61	6	0.62	12	0.61
Osinska 1989		22	0.88	21	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.31	40	0.07	35	0.15
Paderewski 1912		41	0.80	36	0.00	45	0.08	38	0.08	41	0.06	45	0.07
Perahia 1994		61	0.54	23	0.00	55	0.03	64	0.03	60	0.04	64	0.03
Perlemuter 1986		40	0.82	54	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.08	45	0.05	47	0.06
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rangell 2001		6	0.93	7	0.02	5	0.21	6	0.72	1	0.71	5	0.71
Risler 1920		33	0.84	63	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.13	9	0.53	26	0.26
Rosen 1989		31	0.85	34	0.00	37	0.06	47	0.06	15	0.33	39	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.62	29	0.00	60	0.06	52	0.06	59	0.04	50	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		43	0.80	59	0.00	44	0.06	50	0.06	41	0.05	55	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		56	0.74	50	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	50	0.04	59	0.04
Rummel 1943		58	0.70	37	0.00	56	0.03	63	0.03	33	0.08	53	0.05
Shebanova 2002		14	0.91	9	0.01	15	0.18	16	0.54	6	0.58	14	0.56
Smith 1975		35	0.84	58	0.00	42	0.10	35	0.10	34	0.06	43	0.08
Szpilman 1948		37	0.84	49	0.00	40	0.11	33	0.11	32	0.14	40	0.12
Uninsky 1971		32	0.84	17	0.01	34	0.07	43	0.07	31	0.11	41	0.09
Wasowski 1980		49	0.77	20	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	39	0.05	56	0.04
Weissenberg 1971		10	0.92	19	0.00	9	0.29	9	0.67	2	0.72	6	0.69
Average		5	0.94	4	0.06	8	0.21	2	0.79	15	0.47	13	0.61
Random 1		65	-0.12	47	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.03	60	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	34	0.05	60	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.19	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	37	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).